Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2194172065> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W2194172065 abstract "Since 1934, the United States Supreme Court has had the power to make Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and it has exercised this power through a committee structure comprised of judges, lawyers and legal academics. Until the 1970s, ? as this process is commonly called ? was considered by many to be the optimal method of making procedural rules. In recent decades, however, the traditional court rulemaking model has come under attack. Critics complain about the legitimacy of a politically unaccountable process and the efficacy of the rules such a process creates. Much of this criticism reflects a profound shift in thinking about procedural law. Critics reject the idea that civil process is normatively independent of substance. They argue instead that procedure has substantive effects and involves controversial value choices, and they conclude that rulemaking is necessarily and thus requires greater public and political accountability than the traditional court rulemaking model provides. This article critically examines these claims and develops a theory of procedural rulemaking that justifies a major role for courts largely free of legislative interference. The article argues that the main features of court rulemaking ? a court-based, committee-centered, and centralized process ? are well suited to making general constitutive rules that define the basic framework of the procedural system and some of the more detailed rules that control costly forms of strategic behavior. More generally, the proper function of court rulemaking is to develop and maintain an integrated system of rules that reflects the best principled account of procedural practice. On this view, the legitimacy of court rulemaking does not depend on public participation or political accountability, but instead on a model of principled deliberation akin to common law reasoning. After briefly surveying the history of court rulemaking and the decline of the traditional model, the article examines the relationship between procedure and substance at the heart of the modern critique, and evaluates current attempts to justify court rulemaking in the face of that critique. The article then develops a new justification for court rulemaking by analyzing the core features of the traditional model under efficiency, rights-based, and process-based theories of procedural law. The article concludes with some thoughts about the relationship between the Court and Congress under the current Rules Enabling Act." @default.
- W2194172065 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2194172065 creator A5056148418 @default.
- W2194172065 date "1999-02-26" @default.
- W2194172065 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2194172065 title "The Process of Making Process: Court Rulemaking, Democratic Legitimacy, and Procedural Efficacy" @default.
- W2194172065 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W2194172065 type Work @default.
- W2194172065 sameAs 2194172065 @default.
- W2194172065 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W2194172065 countsByYear W21941720652013 @default.
- W2194172065 countsByYear W21941720652014 @default.
- W2194172065 countsByYear W21941720652016 @default.
- W2194172065 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2194172065 hasAuthorship W2194172065A5056148418 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C2778415160 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C2779149496 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C2781019588 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C538833194 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C144024400 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C15744967 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C169760540 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C17744445 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C190253527 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C199539241 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C26760741 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C2778272461 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C2778415160 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C2779149496 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C2781019588 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C46295352 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C538833194 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C83009810 @default.
- W2194172065 hasConceptScore W2194172065C94625758 @default.
- W2194172065 hasOpenAccess W2194172065 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W10119073 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W1481919363 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W1556953214 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W1579764179 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W196203343 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2244015927 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2255821683 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2287621448 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2301249481 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2473745365 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2519616576 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2795678096 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W2974797700 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W3121415346 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W3122062559 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W3124961031 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W3125470846 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W3135574691 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W3142388176 @default.
- W2194172065 hasRelatedWork W424027461 @default.
- W2194172065 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2194172065 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2194172065 magId "2194172065" @default.
- W2194172065 workType "article" @default.