FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2198320210> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2198320210 endingPage "150" @default.
• W2198320210 startingPage "141" @default.
• W2198320210 abstract "Breast screening with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) fails to detect 15–30% of cancers. This figure is higher for women with dense breasts. A new tomographic technique in mammography has been developed — digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) — which allows images to be viewed in sections through the breast and has the potential to improve cancer detection rates. Results from retrospective reading studies comparing DBT with FFDM have been largely favourable with improvement in sensitivity and specificity. Increases in diagnostic accuracy have been reported as being independent of breast density; however there are mixed reports regarding the detection of microcalcification. Prospective screening studies using DBT with FFDM have demonstrated increased rates in cancer detection compared with FFDM alone. A reduction in false-positive recall rates has also been shown. Screening with the addition of DBT would approximately double radiation dose; however a simulated FFDM image can be generated from a DBT scan. The combination of simulated FFDM images and DBT is being evaluated within several studies and some positive results have been published. Interval cancer rates for the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) demonstrate the limited sensitivity of FFDM in cancer detection. DBT has the potential to increase sensitivity and decrease false-positive recall rates. It has approval for screening and diagnostics in several countries; however, there are issues with DBT as a screening tool including additional reading time, IT storage and connectivity, over-diagnosis, and cost effectiveness. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness trials are needed before the implementation of DBT in NHSBSP can be considered. Breast screening with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) fails to detect 15–30% of cancers. This figure is higher for women with dense breasts. A new tomographic technique in mammography has been developed — digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) — which allows images to be viewed in sections through the breast and has the potential to improve cancer detection rates. Results from retrospective reading studies comparing DBT with FFDM have been largely favourable with improvement in sensitivity and specificity. Increases in diagnostic accuracy have been reported as being independent of breast density; however there are mixed reports regarding the detection of microcalcification. Prospective screening studies using DBT with FFDM have demonstrated increased rates in cancer detection compared with FFDM alone. A reduction in false-positive recall rates has also been shown. Screening with the addition of DBT would approximately double radiation dose; however a simulated FFDM image can be generated from a DBT scan. The combination of simulated FFDM images and DBT is being evaluated within several studies and some positive results have been published. Interval cancer rates for the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) demonstrate the limited sensitivity of FFDM in cancer detection. DBT has the potential to increase sensitivity and decrease false-positive recall rates. It has approval for screening and diagnostics in several countries; however, there are issues with DBT as a screening tool including additional reading time, IT storage and connectivity, over-diagnosis, and cost effectiveness. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness trials are needed before the implementation of DBT in NHSBSP can be considered." @default.
• W2198320210 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2198320210 creator A5007524048 @default.
• W2198320210 creator A5050323956 @default.
• W2198320210 creator A5061280047 @default.
• W2198320210 date "2016-02-01" @default.
• W2198320210 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2198320210 title "Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool" @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1497665910 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1525309593 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1546175822 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1561533017 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1869186963 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1966635488 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1967694661 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1968983912 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1970215988 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1970477251 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1974131602 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1975347873 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1976534251 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1980527762 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1984634678 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1987036565 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1987490068 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1988223972 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W1994693701 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2001974374 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2002930621 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2009232173 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2021374625 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2023616320 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2031632107 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2038207774 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2039606691 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2045305435 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W205369505 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2057024463 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2059729247 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2061594521 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2064422127 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2073064253 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2079726425 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2083199492 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2086485261 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2090639641 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2092688199 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2100159406 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2103895023 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2110262969 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2111066681 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2111221575 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2120805174 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2122815913 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2123869011 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2126159379 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2126584120 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2127109751 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2130017212 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2137082888 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2138262374 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2138906723 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2139442654 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2146448637 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2148793338 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2149291062 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2151047842 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2152758555 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2154477792 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2158732932 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2169331774 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2315996897 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W2419348919 @default.
• W2198320210 cites W250128136 @default.
• W2198320210 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.11.008" @default.
• W2198320210 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26707815" @default.
• W2198320210 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2198320210 type Work @default.
• W2198320210 sameAs 2198320210 @default.
• W2198320210 citedByCount "115" @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102016 @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102017 @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102018 @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102019 @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102020 @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102021 @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102022 @default.
• W2198320210 countsByYear W21983202102023 @default.
• W2198320210 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2198320210 hasAuthorship W2198320210A5007524048 @default.
• W2198320210 hasAuthorship W2198320210A5050323956 @default.
• W2198320210 hasAuthorship W2198320210A5061280047 @default.
• W2198320210 hasBestOaLocation W21983202102 @default.
• W2198320210 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2198320210 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2198320210 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2198320210 hasConcept C147454874 @default.
• W2198320210 hasConcept C19527891 @default.

• next