FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W219948358> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W219948358 startingPage "247" @default.
• W219948358 abstract "In almost every jurisdiction, this little-known remedy should be available to be used to preserve relevant, potential, tangible or physical evidence IN THE WAR of words of contemporary litigation, physical evidence usually determines the balance of power and the outcome. Juries commonly are instructed to disregard testimony that conflicts with established physical fact. Physical evidence, mute but tangible, ordinarily exercises greater persuasive force than all the words uttered by scores of witnesses. Physical evidence persuades because it simultaneously and immediately engages the senses of sight and touch and captures both the history of and the true reasons for a wide variety of conditions and events. In vehicle litigation, scrape marks, gouges, dents and tears are useful determining the point of and direction of application of forces and the types of forces applied to materials. In products litigation, the physical evidence--the thing itself--is essential to determining many factors, including (1) the point of origin of a failure; (2) whether an alleged defective product was manufactured substantial compliance with manufacturing specifications; (3) the physical, chemical, electrical, thermal and mechanical properties of materials; and (4) the actual geometries and section thicknesses of the article or device. Physical objects can be subjected to a wide range of destructive and non-destructive testing, such as x-ray examination, to determine properties, character and changes properties and character. Testing can foreclose genuine debate over the reasons for the behavior of tangible objects. In construction litigation, the story told just by the condition of the box beam involved the Kansas City Hyatt disaster is legendary for its simplicity, clarity and immediacy. Preserving an accident scene and all the physical evidence is critical to preserving the truth. Preserving intact a scene of a catastrophic loss is essential to determining the cause and origin of most failures and to conducting an inquiry into the reasons for failures. Indeed, the subject of collection and preservation of physical items, information and evidence is so important that it is the subject of ASTM Designation E 1188 published by the American Society of Testing and Materials. But what happens when defense counsel is notified of a catastrophic event--for instance, a fire loss--and of pre-suit activities that could lead to the loss or alteration of physical evidence? Counsel must be aware of a judicial remedy that can be invoked to preserve potentially relevant evidence. That remedy is a court's over both the prospective litigant's interest a future lawsuit and the physical evidence to issue a temporary restraining order to prevent unsupervised loss or alteration of the physical evidence. What is the concept and what are some of the limitations of for the purpose of preserving potentially relevant evidence? What are the procedures for invoking a court's jurisdiction, the requirements for obtaining temporary restraining orders, and the use of the contempt remedy to address violations of those orders? As a general procedural backdrop, this article uses Wisconsin law, Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and court decisions. It is intended to alert counsel to a general remedy based on in-rem or jurisdiction, and statutory procedures specifically authorizing pre-suit remedies to preserve evidence are beyond its scope. QUASI-IN-REM JURISDICTION: THE CONCEPT Judicial power over property, tangible or intangible, things or status, is known as in rem jurisdiction or quasi-in-rem A right to judgment a lawsuit is a right: a chose action.(1) An interest a lawsuit is a form of property.(2) The prospective litigant's interest a potential lawsuit and the preservation of evidence that might be relevant that lawsuit are the interests property that suffice to support standing and the invocation of a court's rem or jurisdiction. …" @default.
• W219948358 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W219948358 creator A5077727479 @default.
• W219948358 date "1998-04-01" @default.
• W219948358 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W219948358 title "Using Quasi-in-Rem Jurisdiction to Prevent Pre-Suit Loss or Alteration of Evidence" @default.
• W219948358 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W219948358 type Work @default.
• W219948358 sameAs 219948358 @default.
• W219948358 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W219948358 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W219948358 hasAuthorship W219948358A5077727479 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W219948358 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C107038049 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C121332964 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C136197465 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C142362112 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C154945302 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C15744967 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C163258240 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C17744445 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C199539241 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C2776949292 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C41008148 @default.
• W219948358 hasConceptScore W219948358C62520636 @default.
• W219948358 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W219948358 hasLocation W2199483581 @default.
• W219948358 hasOpenAccess W219948358 @default.
• W219948358 hasPrimaryLocation W2199483581 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W107953798 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W126189510 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W1482349421 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W1580305755 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2252722379 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2252750243 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2259765029 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2373253146 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2382951600 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2435881781 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2598651836 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2738039111 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2984163486 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2997205278 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W3121538483 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W3122881895 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W3164765015 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W340296232 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W342280556 @default.
• W219948358 hasRelatedWork W2598984262 @default.
• W219948358 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W219948358 isParatext "false" @default.
• W219948358 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W219948358 magId "219948358" @default.
• W219948358 workType "article" @default.