FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2199747314> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2199747314 abstract "It is well-known that the Supreme Court’s Chevron decision has generated substantial commentary. In light of this voluminous Chevron commentary, it is surprising that one important aspect of Chevron has generated relatively little discussion in that commentary. That aspect is the conflict between Chevron’s mandate that a court must defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of a statute that the agency administers and the rule in the Administrative Procedure Act that “the reviewing court shall … interpret … statutory provisions.” The Chevron decision did not even refer to the APA’s judicial review provisions, much less provide any explanation of how the concept of Chevron deference might be reconciled with the APA’s clear assignment of interpretative authority to courts rather than agencies. A number of commentators have acknowledged the existence of an apparent conflict between Chevron and this provision of the APA, but very few have given serious consideration to the conflict. Those that have given serious attention to the conflict have not resolved it, while generally claiming to do so in favor of the correctness of Chevron. The reality of this conflict is confirmed by the fact that the APA exempts from the notice and comment requirements that ordinarily apply to agency rulemaking those rules that are “interpretative.” Since the APA directs that it is courts, rather than agencies, that are the authoritative interpreters of statutory provisions, it is appropriate that agency rules that interpret statutory provisions are not required to comply with the notice and comment requirements because such rules cannot in any event have the force of law. However, as an additional negative collateral consequence of Chevron’s failure to give effect to the APA’s judicial review provisions, this sensible understanding of the meaning of the exemption of “interpretative rules” from the notice and comment requirements has not been adopted by the courts, leading instead to confusion and a substantial lack of predictability regarding the meaning of this exemption and the content of the category of “interpretative rules.” However, despite the clear conflict between Chevron and the APA, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule Chevron to resolve this conflict, in light of the substantial number of cases where Chevron has been applied and the uncertainty that would be created by such an overruling for the issues that have been decided in these cases. Nevertheless, drawing the Supreme Court’s attention to this conflict might prompt a clarification of Chevron that would bring the operation of Chevron closer to what the APA requires in terms of the assignment of responsibilities between courts and agencies by requiring a more vigorous attempt by the courts to discern the meaning of the statutory provision at issue, thereby making it more likely that issues of statutory interpretation would be resolved with a judicial interpretation of a statutory provision at step one of the two-part Chevron test rather than with an agency interpretation at Chevron step two." @default.
• W2199747314 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2199747314 creator A5055611035 @default.
• W2199747314 date "2013-06-25" @default.
• W2199747314 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2199747314 title "Chevron's Conflict with the Administrative Procedure Act" @default.
• W2199747314 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2199747314 type Work @default.
• W2199747314 sameAs 2199747314 @default.
• W2199747314 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2199747314 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2199747314 hasAuthorship W2199747314A5055611035 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C2779204856 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C2779913896 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C2780216701 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C2780597233 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C2781019588 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C2781442640 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C58583792 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C108170787 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C144024400 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C151730666 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C158129432 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C17319257 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C17744445 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C190253527 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C199539241 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C2778272461 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C2779204856 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C2779913896 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C2780216701 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C2780597233 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C2781019588 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C2781442640 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C36289849 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C48764862 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C58583792 @default.
• W2199747314 hasConceptScore W2199747314C86803240 @default.
• W2199747314 hasLocation W21997473141 @default.
• W2199747314 hasOpenAccess W2199747314 @default.
• W2199747314 hasPrimaryLocation W21997473141 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W115489224 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W1516067229 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W1523927515 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W1542833451 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W201399070 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W222620774 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W2464688962 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W2545101944 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W2766439213 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W2899582696 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W2916421547 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3095872242 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3121617672 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3123652328 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3125748008 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3137646960 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3186601938 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3188112394 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3190544859 @default.
• W2199747314 hasRelatedWork W3198686796 @default.
• W2199747314 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2199747314 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2199747314 magId "2199747314" @default.
• W2199747314 workType "article" @default.