Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2201996743> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W2201996743 endingPage "73" @default.
- W2201996743 startingPage "167" @default.
- W2201996743 abstract "To assess the prevalence of patients fulfilling clinical review criteria (CRC), to determine activation rates for CRC assessments, to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients who fulfilled CRC with patients who did not, and to identify the documented nursing actions in response to CRC values.A cross-sectional study using a retrospective medical record audit, in a universityaffiliated, tertiary referral hospital with a two-tier rapid response system in Melbourne, Australia. We used a convenience sample of hospital inpatients on general medical, surgical and specialist service wards admitted during a 24-hour period in 2013.Medical emergency team (MET) or code blue activation, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, hospital length of stay and inhospital mortality. For patients who fulfilled CRC or MET criteria during the 24- hour period, the specific criteria fulfilled, escalation treatments and outcomes were collected.Of the sample (N = 422), 81 patients (19%) fulfilled CRC on 109 occasions. From 109 CRC events, 66 patients (81%) had at least one observation fulfilling CRC, and 15 patients (18%) met CRC on multiple occasions. The documented escalation rate was 58 of 109 events (53%). The number of patients who fulfilled CRC and subsequent MET call activation criteria within 24 hours was significantly greater than the number who did not meet CRC (P < 0.001).About one in five patients reached CRC during the study period; these patients were about four times more likely to also fulfil MET call criteria. Contrary to hospital policy, escalation was not documented for about half the patients meeting CRC values. Despite the clarity of escalation procedures on the graphic observation chart, escalation remains an ongoing problem. Further research is needed on the impact on patient outcomes over time and to understand factors influencing staff response." @default.
- W2201996743 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2201996743 creator A5011600298 @default.
- W2201996743 creator A5048718542 @default.
- W2201996743 creator A5076136083 @default.
- W2201996743 creator A5078798306 @default.
- W2201996743 date "2015-09-01" @default.
- W2201996743 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
- W2201996743 title "Clinical review criteria and medical emergency teams: evaluating a two-tier rapid response system." @default.
- W2201996743 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26282254" @default.
- W2201996743 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2201996743 type Work @default.
- W2201996743 sameAs 2201996743 @default.
- W2201996743 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W2201996743 countsByYear W22019967432017 @default.
- W2201996743 countsByYear W22019967432019 @default.
- W2201996743 countsByYear W22019967432021 @default.
- W2201996743 countsByYear W22019967432022 @default.
- W2201996743 countsByYear W22019967432023 @default.
- W2201996743 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2201996743 hasAuthorship W2201996743A5011600298 @default.
- W2201996743 hasAuthorship W2201996743A5048718542 @default.
- W2201996743 hasAuthorship W2201996743A5076136083 @default.
- W2201996743 hasAuthorship W2201996743A5078798306 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C2910912111 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C126322002 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C162324750 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C187736073 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C194828623 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C195910791 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C199521495 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C2776135927 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C2776376669 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C2910912111 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C512399662 @default.
- W2201996743 hasConceptScore W2201996743C71924100 @default.
- W2201996743 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2201996743 hasLocation W22019967431 @default.
- W2201996743 hasOpenAccess W2201996743 @default.
- W2201996743 hasPrimaryLocation W22019967431 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W1946531130 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W19996178 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W2026208670 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W2169732003 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W2569894216 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W2894977212 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W2921162207 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W3194200472 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W4210434819 @default.
- W2201996743 hasRelatedWork W2271349930 @default.
- W2201996743 hasVolume "17" @default.
- W2201996743 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2201996743 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2201996743 magId "2201996743" @default.
- W2201996743 workType "article" @default.