Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2207612239> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W2207612239 endingPage "132" @default.
- W2207612239 startingPage "109" @default.
- W2207612239 abstract "Two major legacies that Newton left his eighteenth-century followers were his writings on the nature of light and those on scientific method. Yet little more than a century after Newton's death the generally accepted Newto nian position on both these subjects was overthrown. Although in the eighteenth century almost every British natural philosopher accepted with out question the corpuscular interpretation of Newton's writings on op tics, by the 1830's most British natural philosophers had rejected Newton's corpuscular theory in favor of the wave theory of light. Intimately bound up with this scientific revolution in optical theory was a change in scien tific methodology: the replacement of the method of induction by the method of hypothesis. This paper sets out to examine the optical debates of the early nineteenth century with particular reference to the role played by methodological arguments." @default.
- W2207612239 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2207612239 creator A5073586314 @default.
- W2207612239 date "1975-01-01" @default.
- W2207612239 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2207612239 title "The Reception of the Wave Theory of Light in Britain: A Case Study Illustrating the Role of Methodology in Scientific Debate" @default.
- W2207612239 cites W1493083214 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W1535903168 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W1906625239 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2010228972 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2022722533 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2045717960 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2046688620 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2083887177 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2118881563 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2125007449 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2293783128 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2310636776 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W2328604451 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W32627274 @default.
- W2207612239 cites W639146331 @default.
- W2207612239 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/27757341" @default.
- W2207612239 hasPublicationYear "1975" @default.
- W2207612239 type Work @default.
- W2207612239 sameAs 2207612239 @default.
- W2207612239 citedByCount "40" @default.
- W2207612239 countsByYear W22076122392012 @default.
- W2207612239 countsByYear W22076122392017 @default.
- W2207612239 countsByYear W22076122392020 @default.
- W2207612239 countsByYear W22076122392023 @default.
- W2207612239 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2207612239 hasAuthorship W2207612239A5073586314 @default.
- W2207612239 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2207612239 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2207612239 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2207612239 hasConceptScore W2207612239C111472728 @default.
- W2207612239 hasConceptScore W2207612239C138885662 @default.
- W2207612239 hasConceptScore W2207612239C95457728 @default.
- W2207612239 hasLocation W22076122391 @default.
- W2207612239 hasOpenAccess W2207612239 @default.
- W2207612239 hasPrimaryLocation W22076122391 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W2085477348 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W2098269760 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W2126984280 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W2477989044 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W2731985227 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W3012208873 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W3013226710 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W4254774684 @default.
- W2207612239 hasRelatedWork W598689402 @default.
- W2207612239 hasVolume "6" @default.
- W2207612239 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2207612239 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2207612239 magId "2207612239" @default.
- W2207612239 workType "article" @default.