FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2210068211> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2210068211 endingPage "S62" @default.
• W2210068211 startingPage "S62" @default.
• W2210068211 abstract "Study ObjectivesTo determine the effect of teaching proper hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HOCPR) technique on a layperson’s willingness to use it.MethodsStudy participants were selected from the University of Toledo Medical Center Emergency Department in addition to the Toledo area community. All subjects 18 years of age and older willing to learn proper HOCPR technique and follow up with one- and six-month surveys were enrolled in the study. Participants were shown a teaching video from the American Heart Association (AHA), followed by a mannequin demonstration. Participants then filled out a survey immediately after practicing HOCPR on the mannequin and at one month.ResultsSeventy-five subjects received HOCPR training and completed an initial survey and 44 (59%) of the subjects completed a one-month follow-up survey. The results of the initial survey revealed that 100% (n=75) were able to correctly recall the HOCPR process and 79% (n=59) were very likely to provide HOCPR to a person suffering from a cardiac episode. 76% (n=57) were more willing to assist a person in need as a result of not having to provide breaths to the person in need. At the one-month follow-up, 100% (n=59) of the respondents remembered the order of steps and 73% (n=32) were willing to provide HOCPR since no rescue breathing was required. After learning the material, 15% (n=11) of the participants tried to teach their family and friends about HOCPR.ConclusionHOCPR is a simple method that the average person is able to recall after a brief training in proper technique. Subjects were more willing to provide HOCPR because providing breaths was not required. In addition, HOCPR was simple enough for participants to teach their family and friends. Study ObjectivesTo determine the effect of teaching proper hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HOCPR) technique on a layperson’s willingness to use it. To determine the effect of teaching proper hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HOCPR) technique on a layperson’s willingness to use it. MethodsStudy participants were selected from the University of Toledo Medical Center Emergency Department in addition to the Toledo area community. All subjects 18 years of age and older willing to learn proper HOCPR technique and follow up with one- and six-month surveys were enrolled in the study. Participants were shown a teaching video from the American Heart Association (AHA), followed by a mannequin demonstration. Participants then filled out a survey immediately after practicing HOCPR on the mannequin and at one month. Study participants were selected from the University of Toledo Medical Center Emergency Department in addition to the Toledo area community. All subjects 18 years of age and older willing to learn proper HOCPR technique and follow up with one- and six-month surveys were enrolled in the study. Participants were shown a teaching video from the American Heart Association (AHA), followed by a mannequin demonstration. Participants then filled out a survey immediately after practicing HOCPR on the mannequin and at one month. ResultsSeventy-five subjects received HOCPR training and completed an initial survey and 44 (59%) of the subjects completed a one-month follow-up survey. The results of the initial survey revealed that 100% (n=75) were able to correctly recall the HOCPR process and 79% (n=59) were very likely to provide HOCPR to a person suffering from a cardiac episode. 76% (n=57) were more willing to assist a person in need as a result of not having to provide breaths to the person in need. At the one-month follow-up, 100% (n=59) of the respondents remembered the order of steps and 73% (n=32) were willing to provide HOCPR since no rescue breathing was required. After learning the material, 15% (n=11) of the participants tried to teach their family and friends about HOCPR. Seventy-five subjects received HOCPR training and completed an initial survey and 44 (59%) of the subjects completed a one-month follow-up survey. The results of the initial survey revealed that 100% (n=75) were able to correctly recall the HOCPR process and 79% (n=59) were very likely to provide HOCPR to a person suffering from a cardiac episode. 76% (n=57) were more willing to assist a person in need as a result of not having to provide breaths to the person in need. At the one-month follow-up, 100% (n=59) of the respondents remembered the order of steps and 73% (n=32) were willing to provide HOCPR since no rescue breathing was required. After learning the material, 15% (n=11) of the participants tried to teach their family and friends about HOCPR. ConclusionHOCPR is a simple method that the average person is able to recall after a brief training in proper technique. Subjects were more willing to provide HOCPR because providing breaths was not required. In addition, HOCPR was simple enough for participants to teach their family and friends. HOCPR is a simple method that the average person is able to recall after a brief training in proper technique. Subjects were more willing to provide HOCPR because providing breaths was not required. In addition, HOCPR was simple enough for participants to teach their family and friends." @default.
• W2210068211 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2210068211 creator A5011746725 @default.
• W2210068211 creator A5018450058 @default.
• W2210068211 creator A5042831241 @default.
• W2210068211 creator A5052640012 @default.
• W2210068211 date "2015-10-01" @default.
• W2210068211 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2210068211 title "175 Does Knowing Hands-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improve Willingness to Use It?" @default.
• W2210068211 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.07.207" @default.
• W2210068211 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2210068211 type Work @default.
• W2210068211 sameAs 2210068211 @default.
• W2210068211 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2210068211 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2210068211 hasAuthorship W2210068211A5011746725 @default.
• W2210068211 hasAuthorship W2210068211A5018450058 @default.
• W2210068211 hasAuthorship W2210068211A5042831241 @default.
• W2210068211 hasAuthorship W2210068211A5052640012 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C100660578 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C2777055891 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C67597806 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C100660578 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C15744967 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C17744445 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C180747234 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C1862650 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C194828623 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C199539241 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C2777055891 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C2778165595 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C512399662 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C545542383 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C67597806 @default.
• W2210068211 hasConceptScore W2210068211C71924100 @default.
• W2210068211 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2210068211 hasLocation W22100682111 @default.
• W2210068211 hasOpenAccess W2210068211 @default.
• W2210068211 hasPrimaryLocation W22100682111 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W1603808899 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W1981877114 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W2054439275 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W2158584734 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W2299056191 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W2416831074 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W2418798573 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W2585551932 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W4236094856 @default.
• W2210068211 hasRelatedWork W4237318096 @default.
• W2210068211 hasVolume "66" @default.
• W2210068211 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2210068211 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2210068211 magId "2210068211" @default.
• W2210068211 workType "article" @default.