FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2210244787> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2210244787 abstract "In the United States there are a large number of religious communities that do not have the resources to obtain a meeting place of their own. Frequently, these groups meet in public schools, taking advantage of liberal rental policies that provide inexpensive space to community groups. Not surprisingly, this kind religious use of public space has generated much First Amendment litigation.It is now settled law under the Public Forum Doctrine that such religious groups must have access to public facilities on an equal footing with non-religious groups. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has expressed concern that First Amendment problems could arise if a religious group dominated the available rental space in such a forum.Although the forum domination problem is one that the Supreme Court has discussed in several opinions, it has never faced the question directly. In spite of the Court’s speculation on the matter, and although the specter of forum domination is often raised, cases of courts actually finding forum domination have been quite rare. More recently, however, the Second Circuit has shown a willingness to find domination in a wider range of scenarios. This note will argue that the Second Circuit has taken an overly broad view of forum domination that does not comport with the Supreme Court’s cases. Properly understood, forum domination occurs only when one group uses a forum’s resources to the exclusion of others who actually seek access to them.Although forum domination is a problem of narrower scope than the Second Circuit has held, it still is a genuine problem. Forum domination may result in impermissible government aid to, or endorsement of, religion. This note will argue, however, that the most plausible reading of the Supreme Court’s cases is that the forum domination problem presents a limit, not on private speech, but on the government’s administration of public fora. This note will also evaluate several of the policy options available to local governments to avoid the forum domination problem.Finally, this note will conclude that although courts have discussed the forum domination problem primarily in the context of the use of a forum by religious speakers, it may arise regardless of the religiosity of a forum’s participants. Consequently, enacting policies to ensure the equitable treatment of all speakers is critical in any forum with limited space." @default.
• W2210244787 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2210244787 creator A5014871609 @default.
• W2210244787 date "2012-09-03" @default.
• W2210244787 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2210244787 title "Forum Domination: Religious Speech in Extremely Limited Public Fora" @default.
• W2210244787 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2210244787 type Work @default.
• W2210244787 sameAs 2210244787 @default.
• W2210244787 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2210244787 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2210244787 hasAuthorship W2210244787A5014871609 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C170154142 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C2778572836 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C2984866010 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConcept C85502023 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C127413603 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C138885662 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C170154142 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C17744445 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C199539241 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C2776211767 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C2778272461 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C2778572836 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C2984866010 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C41895202 @default.
• W2210244787 hasConceptScore W2210244787C85502023 @default.
• W2210244787 hasLocation W22102447871 @default.
• W2210244787 hasOpenAccess W2210244787 @default.
• W2210244787 hasPrimaryLocation W22102447871 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W123393620 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W1546713912 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W1565457578 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W187493066 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W1945792058 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2287623330 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2338911606 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W23860702 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2527619472 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2603885488 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2611620800 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2767730425 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W291925514 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W3008135437 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W3121742755 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W3122662768 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W3124500281 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W327146077 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2099865795 @default.
• W2210244787 hasRelatedWork W2102679281 @default.
• W2210244787 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2210244787 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2210244787 magId "2210244787" @default.
• W2210244787 workType "article" @default.