FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2211301176> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2211301176 endingPage "130" @default.
• W2211301176 startingPage "123" @default.
• W2211301176 abstract "Abstract The Ojo Alamo was named by Brown in 1910 for exposures south of the store at Ojo Alamo Arroyo. Brown said that the Ojo Alamo was a dinosaur-bearing shale unit overlain by a conglomerate bed. Brown put no lower boundary on the Ojo Alamo. In 1914 Sinclair and Granger raised the upper contact of the Ojo Alamo to include the overlying conglomerate because they found “the centrum of a dinosaurian caudal vertebra . . . loose on the surface ... ”of the “conglomeratic sandstone with much fossil wood.” They also described a lower conglomerate, 6 to 8 feet thick, 58 feet below the upper conglomerate. Sinclair and Granger, also, did not place a lower boundary on the Ojo Alamo. In 1916 Bauer redefined the Ojo Alamo as “a sandstone including lenses of shale and conglomerate.” He agreed with Sinclair and Granger that the top of the Ojo Alamo was the top of the conglomeratic sandstone, but he placed the base of the Ojo Alamo at the base of the lower conglomerate of Sinclair and Granger. Reeside accepted Bauer’s redefinition in 1924 and mapped the Ojo Alamo as a conglomeratic sandstone throughout the western San Juan Basin. Reeside, however, designated the Ojo Alamo as Tertiary (?). Dane discussed the Ojo Alamo in 1936, and also agreed with Bauer’s definition of it, but suggested that it “should be classified as Cretaceous.” Dane mapped the Ojo Alamo throughout the southeastern San Juan Basin as a coarse-grained, in places conglomeratic, sandstone. In 1966 Baltz, Ash, and Anderson suggested that “the name Ojo Alamo Sandstone be restricted to apply only to the upper conglomerate of Bauer’s type Ojo Alamo Sandstone on Ojo Alamo Arroyo.” This redefinition of the Ojo Alamo ironically eliminated the last remnant of Brown’s original Ojo Alamo on Ojo Alamo Arroyo from the restricted Ojo Alamo of Baltz, Ash, and Anderson. In 1973 Powell recommended that the revision of the Ojo Alamo by Baltz, Ash, and Anderson be dropped and that the original rock-stratigraphic definition of the Ojo Alamo be revived. Powell further divided the Ojo Alamo into a lower member, the Naashoibito Member which was defined by Baltz, ash, and Anderson (1966) as a member of the Kirtland Shale and an upper member, the Kimbeto Member. During the time that the definition of the Ojo Alamo was evolving, as briefly outlined above, the fossil vertebrate remains collected by Barnum Brown, C.W. Gilmore, and others in the Ojo Alamo Arroyo area were being referred to in paleontological papers in publications throughout the world. Nearly all these publications referred to the Ojo Alamo as a dinosaur-bearing shale unit in much the same sense as the original definition of Brown. Thus, today the name Ojo Alamo has two distinct meanings: to rock-stratigraphers, it is a conglomeratic sandstone and shale sequence; to biostratigraphers, it is a shale unit containing a distinctive vertebrate fauna." @default.
• W2211301176 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2211301176 creator A5018868868 @default.
• W2211301176 date "1973-01-01" @default.
• W2211301176 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2211301176 title "The Saga of the Ojo Alamo Sandstone; or The Rock-Stratigrapher and the Paleontologist Should be Friends" @default.
• W2211301176 hasPublicationYear "1973" @default.
• W2211301176 type Work @default.
• W2211301176 sameAs 2211301176 @default.
• W2211301176 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2211301176 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2211301176 hasAuthorship W2211301176A5018868868 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConcept C106804226 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConcept C109007969 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConcept C12294951 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConceptScore W2211301176C106804226 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConceptScore W2211301176C109007969 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConceptScore W2211301176C12294951 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConceptScore W2211301176C127313418 @default.
• W2211301176 hasConceptScore W2211301176C151730666 @default.
• W2211301176 hasLocation W22113011761 @default.
• W2211301176 hasOpenAccess W2211301176 @default.
• W2211301176 hasPrimaryLocation W22113011761 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W1484687600 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W1505557739 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W1598711625 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W1988345179 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2004600214 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2007708289 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2013557044 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2031185142 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2076798307 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2094156140 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2107193670 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2132354116 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2149082546 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2183713884 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2315116976 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2327319932 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2327911866 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W2513163294 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W90589 @default.
• W2211301176 hasRelatedWork W3140374508 @default.
• W2211301176 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2211301176 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2211301176 magId "2211301176" @default.
• W2211301176 workType "article" @default.