FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2212549795> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2212549795 startingPage "290" @default.
• W2212549795 abstract "(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1. IntroductionConsumers encounter difficulties in making online purchase decisions because information is limited in online market [Dimoka et al. 2012]. Online reviews, defined as product information created by users based on personal usage [Chen & Xie 2008], are important sources of information that can help consumers make purchase decisions [Basuroy et al. 2003; Chen et al. 2008; Chevalier & Mayzlin 2006; Dellarocas et al. 2007; Duan et al. 2008]. Therefore, consumers consult online reviews, written by other consumers who have bought product, to reduce uncertainty of their purchase decision.However, online reviews are not always valuable. Online markets that use online reviews to increase their sales volume must identify helpful reviews among a huge number of online reviews. Many online markets, such as Amazon.com, have attempted to measure helpfulness of online reviews to provide their consumers with most informative ones, thereby reducing information overload caused by rapid increase of reviews.Previous studies on factors that determine helpfulness of online reviews have considered several factors; such as review rating [Cao et al. 2011; Ghose & Ipeirotis 2007; Mudambi & Schuff 2010], reviewer credibility [Baek et al. 2012; Forman et al. 2008], word count [Baek et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2006; Mudambi & Schuff 2010], subjectivity [Ghose & Ipeirotis 2011], and readability [Ghose & Ipeirotis 2011; Zhu et al. 2014]. Many studies have been conducted to determine effect of review ratings (i.e., review extremity) on review helpfulness [Cao et al. 2011; Ghose & Ipeirotis 2007]. However, these studies have provided inconclusive findings regarding relationship between helpfulness of online reviews and rating extremity. Several studies have proposed that reviews that offer extreme ratings are more helpful compared with reviews that provide moderate ratings [Cao et al. 2011; Ghose & Ipeirotis 2007]. Mudambi and Schuff [2010] determined that review ratings influence review helpfulness, but relationship between review helpfulness and review rating is not consistent. To explain this result, they suggested that type of (either an experience good or a search good) has a moderating effect on relationship between rating extremity and review helpfulness.Owing to their limited opportunities to experience e-commerce products, people tend to form their viewpoints on these products based on opinions of others. Online reviews usually provide a large number of opinions, thereby establishing attitudes toward a of majority easily. The present research suggests that these attitude-creating mechanisms can be explained through normative social influence, which is the influence to conform to positive expectations of another [Deutsch & Gerard 1955]. This study uses normative social influence concept and posits that online reviews that provide a rating similar to average rating, which is an intensive form of customer opinion, are helpful. Average rating, one of important variants of group decision making (such as voting, consensus, averaging, and prediction market) and a type of collective intelligence [Malone et al. 2010] , is defined as the capacity of human collectives to engage in intellectual cooperation in order to create, innovate, and invent [Levy 2010]. This study demonstrates through perspective of normative social influence that previous studies have provided inconsistent findings because these have failed to consider that consumer attitudes to quality can be affected by average rating.To this end, this study collects 15,059 online review data on various goods sold on Amazon.com, examines relationship between review rating and review helpfulness, and investigates how this relationship changes depending on average rating. …" @default.
• W2212549795 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2212549795 creator A5001459508 @default.
• W2212549795 creator A5002785562 @default.
• W2212549795 creator A5032664094 @default.
• W2212549795 creator A5091201493 @default.
• W2212549795 date "2015-11-01" @default.
• W2212549795 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2212549795 title "Normative Social Influence and Online Review Helpfulness: Polynomial Modeling and Response Surface Analysis" @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1491664188 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1506738637 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1548408014 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1598251544 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1604147311 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1832238961 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W193524605 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1965449946 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1966503997 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1967380540 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1969202669 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1976927254 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1983976677 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1987198869 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1987425720 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1989698229 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1992258230 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W1992929674 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2012662675 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2017016179 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2022204871 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2022467844 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2028514255 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2032956261 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2041963608 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2043091333 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2047533722 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2050623584 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2057275223 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2058837212 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2082398729 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2084046180 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2085279657 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2087294982 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2088687286 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2098940738 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2099934438 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2100772444 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2105754449 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2107002115 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2110636172 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2111616986 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2116401198 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2121392694 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2126581536 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2126977778 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2130801612 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2134353060 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2136360414 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2139427924 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2142341229 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2143455647 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2157186607 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2160338921 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2164552585 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2166706824 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2277115990 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2281748623 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2319556062 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2331483834 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2443255999 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2968867397 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3121659628 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3122657203 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3122724846 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3123091093 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3123513055 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3124686198 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3124946654 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3125189097 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3125621338 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W3125672425 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W841295348 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W90604094 @default.
• W2212549795 cites W2166048859 @default.
• W2212549795 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2212549795 type Work @default.
• W2212549795 sameAs 2212549795 @default.
• W2212549795 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2212549795 countsByYear W22125497952016 @default.
• W2212549795 countsByYear W22125497952017 @default.
• W2212549795 countsByYear W22125497952019 @default.
• W2212549795 countsByYear W22125497952020 @default.
• W2212549795 countsByYear W22125497952021 @default.
• W2212549795 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2212549795 hasAuthorship W2212549795A5001459508 @default.
• W2212549795 hasAuthorship W2212549795A5002785562 @default.
• W2212549795 hasAuthorship W2212549795A5032664094 @default.
• W2212549795 hasAuthorship W2212549795A5091201493 @default.
• W2212549795 hasConcept C112698675 @default.

• next