FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2213171049> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2213171049 endingPage "94" @default.
• W2213171049 startingPage "83" @default.
• W2213171049 abstract "The transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) cultured in vitro is a great advance in the treatment of patients suffering from LESC deficiency. However, the optimal technique for LESC isolation from a healthy limbal niche has not yet been established. Our aim was to determine which isolation method renders the highest recovery of functional LESCs from the human limbus. To achieve this purpose, we compared limbal primary cultures (LPCs) obtained from explants and cell suspensions on plastic culture plates. Cell morphology was observed by phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy. LESC, corneal epithelial cell, fibroblast, endothelial cell, melanocyte, and dendritic cell markers were analyzed by real time by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and/or immunofluorescence. In addition, colony forming efficiency (CFE) and the presence of holoclones, meroclones, and paraclones were studied. We observed that LPC cells obtained from both methods had cuboidal morphology, desmosomes, and prominent intermediate filaments. The expression of LESC markers (K14, K15, ABCG2, p63α) was similar or higher in LPCs established through cell suspensions, except the expression of p63α mRNA, and there were no significant differences in the expression of corneal epithelial markers (K3, K12). Endothelial cell (PECAM), melanocyte (MART-1), and dendritic cell (CD11c) proteins were not detected, while fibroblast-protein (S100A4) was detected in all LPCs. The CFE was significantly higher in LPCs from cell suspensions. Cells from confluent LPCs produced by explants generated only paraclones (100%), while the percentage of paraclones from LPCs established through cell suspensions was 90% and the remaining 10% were meroclones. In conclusion, LPCs established from cell suspensions have a cell population richer in functional LESCs than LPCs obtained from explants. These results suggest that in a clinical situation in which it is possible to choose between either of the isolation techniques from the donor limbal tissue, then the cell suspension is probably the best option as long as the cells are expanded following our culture conditions." @default.
• W2213171049 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5005341747 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5032866046 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5053579701 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5068967180 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5069206681 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5069765688 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5077122875 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5083468591 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5087265635 @default.
• W2213171049 creator A5088235634 @default.
• W2213171049 date "2016-05-01" @default.
• W2213171049 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2213171049 title "Comparison of functional limbal epithelial stem cell isolation methods" @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1483167997 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1782792012 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1968261842 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1969100829 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1974159545 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1986272071 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1992953931 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1995177850 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W1995865777 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2004838024 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2005356516 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2009203019 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2013176877 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2014001667 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2019525898 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2036162319 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2036697390 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2040007316 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2040061404 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2044038863 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2049221236 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2054351923 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2068563203 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2072332014 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2077416527 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2085012541 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2087415100 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2088904701 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2091785476 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2094954544 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2097304851 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2100465544 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2111821088 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2114001800 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2119226652 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2121062346 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2126917358 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2128078747 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2132984034 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2147096365 @default.
• W2213171049 cites W2169020624 @default.
• W2213171049 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.12.002" @default.
• W2213171049 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26704459" @default.
• W2213171049 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2213171049 type Work @default.
• W2213171049 sameAs 2213171049 @default.
• W2213171049 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2213171049 countsByYear W22131710492016 @default.
• W2213171049 countsByYear W22131710492017 @default.
• W2213171049 countsByYear W22131710492018 @default.
• W2213171049 countsByYear W22131710492019 @default.
• W2213171049 countsByYear W22131710492020 @default.
• W2213171049 countsByYear W22131710492021 @default.
• W2213171049 countsByYear W22131710492022 @default.
• W2213171049 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5005341747 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5032866046 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5053579701 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5068967180 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5069206681 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5069765688 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5077122875 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5083468591 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5087265635 @default.
• W2213171049 hasAuthorship W2213171049A5088235634 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C136302470 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C1491633281 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C153911025 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C159654299 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C2778236600 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C28328180 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C81885089 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConceptScore W2213171049C136302470 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConceptScore W2213171049C1491633281 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConceptScore W2213171049C153911025 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConceptScore W2213171049C159654299 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConceptScore W2213171049C203014093 @default.
• W2213171049 hasConceptScore W2213171049C2778236600 @default.

• next