FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2214478299> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2214478299 endingPage "1642" @default.
• W2214478299 startingPage "1641" @default.
• W2214478299 abstract "I very much enjoyed reading the summary by Chan and Peterson1Chan AT et al. Gastroenterology;148:1265–1267.Google Scholar about fellowship training, suggesting that residents seeking gastroenterology fellowship positions will be successful if they approach fellowship from the perspective of a Fellowship Program Director. I couldn’t agree more with their recommendations, and I especially endorse their concept that “past behavior predicts future behavior”. While some would argue about the inherent truth of this statement, it is more often true than not. Along these lines, prospective fellows should also carefully assess the fellowship programs to which they are applying.There is a pervasive, and I believe somewhat misguided, concept that to be competitive in a “good” fellowship, research is critical – even for programs that are clearly not research oriented. Thus, I have two suggestions – the first is that not only should applicants be honest with themselves and everyone else about their career track, but fellowship programs should also be true to themselves. Research oriented programs should focus on research oriented fellows (clinical, bench, translational or a combination, depending on the expertise of the program and institution) and clinically oriented programs should focus on excellent clinicians. Of course, some overlap is healthy, but everyone should be clear about their primary focus and goals.For the prospective fellow truly interested in research, carefully evaluate the program - is the program director accomplished in research or does s/he have a strong commitment to support research? Is the faculty enthusiastic about research, and are they available? What is the faculty track record of publication with fellows? What jobs do the fellows have after completion of their fellowship? Does the program support additional degrees such as an MS degree (eg, in outcomes research, biomedical engineering, statistics) or an MPH? And, how will the fellowship program specifically support your career in research? Getting these questions answered early should help everyone. I very much enjoyed reading the summary by Chan and Peterson1Chan AT et al. Gastroenterology;148:1265–1267.Google Scholar about fellowship training, suggesting that residents seeking gastroenterology fellowship positions will be successful if they approach fellowship from the perspective of a Fellowship Program Director. I couldn’t agree more with their recommendations, and I especially endorse their concept that “past behavior predicts future behavior”. While some would argue about the inherent truth of this statement, it is more often true than not. Along these lines, prospective fellows should also carefully assess the fellowship programs to which they are applying. There is a pervasive, and I believe somewhat misguided, concept that to be competitive in a “good” fellowship, research is critical – even for programs that are clearly not research oriented. Thus, I have two suggestions – the first is that not only should applicants be honest with themselves and everyone else about their career track, but fellowship programs should also be true to themselves. Research oriented programs should focus on research oriented fellows (clinical, bench, translational or a combination, depending on the expertise of the program and institution) and clinically oriented programs should focus on excellent clinicians. Of course, some overlap is healthy, but everyone should be clear about their primary focus and goals. For the prospective fellow truly interested in research, carefully evaluate the program - is the program director accomplished in research or does s/he have a strong commitment to support research? Is the faculty enthusiastic about research, and are they available? What is the faculty track record of publication with fellows? What jobs do the fellows have after completion of their fellowship? Does the program support additional degrees such as an MS degree (eg, in outcomes research, biomedical engineering, statistics) or an MPH? And, how will the fellowship program specifically support your career in research? Getting these questions answered early should help everyone. How to Position for the Gastroenterology Fellowship of Your Choice: The Program Director PerspectiveGastroenterologyVol. 148Issue 7PreviewWith fellowship match deadlines rapidly approaching, trainees around the country ask the question “What do program directors look for in applicants for GI fellowship?” There is not a simple “one-size-fits-all” answer. However, after reflecting on several years of overseeing GI fellowship selection as both a current (ATC) and a former (KAP) program director, we have identified a few common themes that seem to distinguish our most successful applicants. This is not intended to be an exhaustive checklist nor a “how to” primer to guarantee admission to a program. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2214478299 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2214478299 creator A5043752774 @default.
• W2214478299 date "2015-11-01" @default.
• W2214478299 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2214478299 title "Research in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training" @default.
• W2214478299 cites W2148416376 @default.
• W2214478299 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.036" @default.
• W2214478299 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26433104" @default.
• W2214478299 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2214478299 type Work @default.
• W2214478299 sameAs 2214478299 @default.
• W2214478299 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2214478299 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2214478299 hasAuthorship W2214478299A5043752774 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C2777026412 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C2994303106 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C15744967 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C17744445 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C199539241 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C2777026412 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C2994303106 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C509550671 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C554936623 @default.
• W2214478299 hasConceptScore W2214478299C71924100 @default.
• W2214478299 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2214478299 hasLocation W22144782991 @default.
• W2214478299 hasLocation W22144782992 @default.
• W2214478299 hasOpenAccess W2214478299 @default.
• W2214478299 hasPrimaryLocation W22144782991 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W1151199228 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W1627665661 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W1754573961 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W1971288970 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W2059158904 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W2059163449 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W2388916557 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2214478299 hasRelatedWork W645739684 @default.
• W2214478299 hasVolume "149" @default.
• W2214478299 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2214478299 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2214478299 magId "2214478299" @default.
• W2214478299 workType "article" @default.