FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2214652223> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2214652223 endingPage "66" @default.
• W2214652223 startingPage "64" @default.
• W2214652223 abstract "A recent survey of ACR Dose Index Registry® participants demonstrated that nearly half were not aware of or familiar with the CT Dose Check standard, which includes CT Dose Alert and CT Dose Notification [ 1 Miller D.L. Bhargavan-Chatfield M. Armstrong M.R. Butler P.F. Clinical implementation of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association CT Dose Check standard at ACR Dose Index Registry sites. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11: 989-994 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar ]. This highlights the need for education and outreach to effectively implement the standard. Especially given that a provision in US federal legislation signed into law in 2014 mandates that CMS, starting in 2016, reimburse at a lower rate for certain diagnostic CT scans performed on CT scanners in physicians’ offices or in the hospital outpatient setting that do not meet all four attributes of the Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance (MITA) Smart Dose CT standard, including CT Dose Check [ 2 National Electrical Manufacturers Association XR 29-2013. Standard attributes on CT equipment related to dose optimization and management. Available at: https://www.nema.org/Standards/Pages/Standard-Attributes-on-CT-Equipment-Related-to-Dose-Optimization-and-Management.aspx#download. Accessed September 29, 2015. Google Scholar ]. In fact, the proposed regulations include a 5% penalty per examination performed on noncompliant CT scanners beginning in January 2016, which increases to 15% in January 2017. There were requests from various organizations, including ACR, to delay implementation of the penalty by twelve months in order to ensure all CT scanners are in compliance, however, such requests were declined [ 3 The American College of Radiology NEMA XR-29 (MITA Smart Dose) Standard: Frequently Asked Questions. Available at: http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Radiation%20Safety/XR29%20FAQs_91015.pdf. Accessed November 16, 2015. Google Scholar ]. The purpose of this article is to describe CT Dose Check, explain why it was implemented, and show how, when it is implemented, it will effectively provide an opportunity to avoid potential acute tissue reactions or excess radiation dose to patients undergoing CT scans. ErratumJournal of the American College of RadiologyVol. 13Issue 6PreviewIn the article titled “What Is the CT Dose Check Standard, and Why Do CT Scanners Need to Be in Compliance?” that published in the January issue of JACR (2016;13:64-66) there was an error in the following sentence: CT Dose Check later became part of MITA’s CT Smart Dose standard (NEMA XR-20) [2]. The correct name is NEMA XR-29. The author regrets this error. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2214652223 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2214652223 creator A5031477702 @default.
• W2214652223 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2214652223 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2214652223 title "What Is the CT Dose Check Standard, and Why Do CT Scanners Need to Be in Compliance?" @default.
• W2214652223 cites W2069744488 @default.
• W2214652223 cites W2090388684 @default.
• W2214652223 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.10.002" @default.
• W2214652223 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26653798" @default.
• W2214652223 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2214652223 type Work @default.
• W2214652223 sameAs 2214652223 @default.
• W2214652223 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2214652223 countsByYear W22146522232017 @default.
• W2214652223 countsByYear W22146522232018 @default.
• W2214652223 countsByYear W22146522232020 @default.
• W2214652223 countsByYear W22146522232021 @default.
• W2214652223 countsByYear W22146522232022 @default.
• W2214652223 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2214652223 hasAuthorship W2214652223A5031477702 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C2777382242 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C2781400479 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C136764020 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C17744445 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C19527891 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C199539241 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C2777382242 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C2781400479 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C2989005 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C41008148 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C545542383 @default.
• W2214652223 hasConceptScore W2214652223C71924100 @default.
• W2214652223 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2214652223 hasLocation W22146522231 @default.
• W2214652223 hasLocation W22146522232 @default.
• W2214652223 hasOpenAccess W2214652223 @default.
• W2214652223 hasPrimaryLocation W22146522231 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W2005936725 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W2059357327 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W2061675792 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W2217997381 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W2220618077 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W2529331727 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W2914623048 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W3039939871 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W3184755128 @default.
• W2214652223 hasRelatedWork W1992276883 @default.
• W2214652223 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2214652223 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2214652223 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2214652223 magId "2214652223" @default.
• W2214652223 workType "article" @default.