FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2215707783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2215707783 endingPage "68" @default.
• W2215707783 startingPage "60" @default.
• W2215707783 abstract "The southeastern, central and southern areas of Brazil have shared a common regional history ever since the period when they formed part of the Portuguese Empire. From the end of the seventeenth to the twenty-first century, it is possible to identify many contexts and situations of tension, conflict, negotiation and agreement between the various parts of this territory, such as the movement of independence, in 1822, the installation of a republican governor in 1889 or the various crises of the first republic, in 1910, 1922 or 1930, as well as at other crucial times in Brazilian history (see the best two syntheses and overviews of the period of the republic: Penna, 1999; Ferreira & Delgado, 2003) Over the last decade or so, there have been great theoretical and methodological advances made in the historical research being conducted into modern oceanic empires (see Boxer, 1965 and 2002; Furtado, 2001; Monteiro, 2005; Elliot, J. H., 2006), or into more contemporary periods (see Hobsbawn, 1992, 1999, 1977, 1995), so that is no longer possible to make locally based reflections about the subject or to undertake monographic research of a purely local character. One way of coping with the difficulties involved in research with such a broad territorial scope is to decrease the time span of the research, and with this strategy we can create favorable conditions for the empirical investigation of documents and literature from different regions. Research carried out into a region such as the southeast-center-south region of Brazil during certain periods of the Portuguese Empire cannot be broken down into separate fractions. For instance, it is not possible to interpret the society of Rio de Janeiro or that of southern Brazil without also including that of Sao Paulo, at least when the research relates to the late seventeenth or eighteenth century. Classical synthesis and current historiography have also followed this form of interpretation (Prado Jr; 1942; Gouvea, 2001; Fragoso, 1998), in the case of research conducted into both political and economic history. From the moment when mining areas were effectively established within the territory of Brazil, or from the moment when the Portuguese Crown became aware that the innermost reaches of this territory should be protected against Spanish invasion, this part of the country clearly began to think together as a whole under a form of realpolitik. Furthermore, one of the greatest challenges faced by historiography in recent years is to understand how modern empires tended to spread into the interior of the continents that they occupied or where they simply had business interests. The extensive hinterland of American territory was late in its colonization. Many human and physical barriers impeded access to its remotest regions, such as the Allegheny Mountains in the (then still British) colony of North America. Only in 1747 was the region beyond those mountains settled with the support of the Ohio Company of Virginia. In order to secure its control of this region of North America, the British Empire had to establish alliances and different schemes for cooperation with the local rivals of the groups of Indians. The price paid for this initiative was a longstanding dispute for control over the fur trade" @default.
• W2215707783 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2215707783 creator A5086762649 @default.
• W2215707783 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2215707783 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2215707783 title "Imaginary wars in the wilds of Portuguese America" @default.
• W2215707783 cites W1053535539 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W1502520624 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W1532399134 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W1589200216 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W1655928122 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W1719548305 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W18985414 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W1981958533 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W2096185837 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W2161427900 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W2788203688 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W3189676858 @default.
• W2215707783 cites W624200534 @default.
• W2215707783 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2215707783 type Work @default.
• W2215707783 sameAs 2215707783 @default.
• W2215707783 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2215707783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2215707783 hasAuthorship W2215707783A5086762649 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C152212766 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C2778495208 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C2781291010 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C35219183 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C35651441 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C53553401 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C105795698 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C107038049 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C111472728 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C138885662 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C142362112 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C152212766 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C17744445 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C195244886 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C199539241 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C199776023 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C205649164 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C2778495208 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C2781291010 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C33923547 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C35219183 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C35651441 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C41895202 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C53553401 @default.
• W2215707783 hasConceptScore W2215707783C95457728 @default.
• W2215707783 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2215707783 hasLocation W22157077831 @default.
• W2215707783 hasOpenAccess W2215707783 @default.
• W2215707783 hasPrimaryLocation W22157077831 @default.
• W2215707783 hasRelatedWork W2043828485 @default.
• W2215707783 hasRelatedWork W2058698954 @default.
• W2215707783 hasRelatedWork W2088915738 @default.
• W2215707783 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2215707783 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2215707783 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2215707783 magId "2215707783" @default.
• W2215707783 workType "article" @default.