FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2217064294> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2217064294 endingPage "479" @default.
• W2217064294 startingPage "468" @default.
• W2217064294 abstract "International interest in feed efficiency, and in particular energy intake and residual energy intake (REI), is intensifying due to a greater global demand for animal-derived protein and energy sources. Feed efficiency is a trait of economic importance, and yet is overlooked in national dairy cow breeding goals. This is due primarily to a lack of accurate data on commercial animals, but also a lack of clarity on the most appropriate definition of the feed intake and utilization complex. The objective of the present study was to derive alternative definitions of energetic efficiency in grazing lactating dairy cows and to quantify the inter-relationships among these alternative definitions. Net energy intake (NEI) from pasture and concentrate intake was estimated up to 8 times per lactation for 2,693 lactations from 1,412 Holstein-Friesian cows. Energy values of feed were based on the French Net Energy system where 1 UFL is the net energy requirements for lactation equivalent of 1kg of air-dry barley. A total of 8,183 individual feed intake measurements were available. Energy balance was defined as the difference between NEI and energy expenditure. Efficiency traits were either ratio-based or residual-based; the latter were derived from least squares regression models. Residual energy intake was defined as NEI minus predicted energy to fulfill the requirements for the various energy sinks. The energy sinks (e.g., NEL, metabolic live weight) and additional contributors to energy kinetics (e.g., live weight loss) combined, explained 59% of the variation in NEI, implying that REI represented 41% of the variance in total NEI. The most efficient 10% of test-day records, as defined by REI (n=709), on average were associated with a 7.59 UFL/d less NEI (average NEI of the entire population was 16.23 UFL/d) than the least efficient 10% of test-day records based on REI (n=709). Additionally, the most efficient 10% of test-day records, as defined by REI, were associated with superior energy conversion efficiency (ECE, i.e., NEL divided by NEI; ECE=0.55) compared with the least efficient 10% of test-day records (ECE=0.33). Moreover, REI was positively correlated with energy balance, implying that more negative REI animals (i.e., deemed more efficient) are expected to be, on average, in greater negative energy balance. Many of the correlations among the 14 defined efficiency traits differed from unity, implying that each trait is measuring a different aspect of efficiency." @default.
• W2217064294 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5001310200 @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5018307964 @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5031038339 @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5042156705 @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5047726326 @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5049795579 @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5056090949 @default.
• W2217064294 creator A5058011152 @default.
• W2217064294 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2217064294 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2217064294 title "Inter-relationships among alternative definitions of feed efficiency in grazing lactating dairy cows" @default.
• W2217064294 cites W1964464800 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W1977404830 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W1989263638 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W1989387846 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W1993900566 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2016303420 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2024055184 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2042425138 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2051568762 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2059555414 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2080540816 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2095280062 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2108439743 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2112264748 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2119523986 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2130136626 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2131315622 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2135061061 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2136619438 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W2170512568 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W295031363 @default.
• W2217064294 cites W71047797 @default.
• W2217064294 doi "https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9928" @default.
• W2217064294 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26585474" @default.
• W2217064294 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2217064294 type Work @default.
• W2217064294 sameAs 2217064294 @default.
• W2217064294 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942015 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942016 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942017 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942018 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942019 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942020 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942021 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942022 @default.
• W2217064294 countsByYear W22170642942023 @default.
• W2217064294 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5001310200 @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5018307964 @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5031038339 @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5042156705 @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5047726326 @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5049795579 @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5056090949 @default.
• W2217064294 hasAuthorship W2217064294A5058011152 @default.
• W2217064294 hasBestOaLocation W22170642941 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C147583825 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C155512373 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C22830521 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2776659692 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2776977481 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2777423268 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2777904157 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2778053677 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2780527838 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C2991880210 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C11413529 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C134018914 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C140793950 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C147583825 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C155512373 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C18903297 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C22830521 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2776659692 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2776977481 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2777423268 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2777904157 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2778053677 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2779234561 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2780527838 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C2991880210 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C33923547 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C39432304 @default.
• W2217064294 hasConceptScore W2217064294C54355233 @default.

• next