FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2217187352> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2217187352 abstract "Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract Shaping the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students: What is the Role We Play? Mica A. Hutchison, Deborah K. Follman, and George M. Bodner Purdue University Abstract Numerous studies have linked undergraduate students’ interests, performance, and retention in science and engineering fields to self-efficacy. The research also suggests that female science and engineering students have poorer self-efficacy beliefs, those beliefs about their capabilities to perform the tasks necessary to achieve a desired outcome, than do their male counterparts. This study is aimed at identifying factors related to students’ self-efficacy beliefs during their first engineering course. Results are presented from a mid-semester survey administered to freshman engineering students (n = 1387) enrolled in ENGR 106, Engineering Problem-Solving and Computer Tools, at Purdue University. The survey incorporated qualitative measures of student self-efficacy beliefs. Open-ended survey questions prompted students to list those factors affecting their confidence in their ability to succeed in the course. Gender trends emerged in student responses to factors that affect confidence in success. These trends are discussed in light of the four categories Bandura1 has identified as sources of self- efficacy beliefs: mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasions, and physiological states. The results presented here provide a useful look into how the classroom and curricular practices being employed during students’ first year in engineering affect confidence, and ultimately, retention and success. Introduction Currently, the fields of science and engineering are faced with two major challenges in producing the necessary workforce for the future: recruiting students to the fields and then retaining those who do enroll through the completion of their degrees. Significant steps are now being taken to increase interest in these fields and boost enrollments of students into related programs. Science and engineering programs must also modify the learning environment to retain more students than they currently do if the demands for the workforce of the future are to be met. National trends show that the retention rate of women in these fields varies from 30 to 46 percent, depending on the size and type of institution studied, while, for their male counterparts, rates vary from 39 to 61 percent.2 These data indicate that retention is poor on the whole, but also that the problem is more significant among women. The occurrence of poor retention in science and engineering fields has already become the focus of numerous studies. Results of these studies have linked the efficacy beliefs of undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005. American Society for Engineering Education”" @default.
• W2217187352 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2217187352 creator A5034815385 @default.
• W2217187352 creator A5047731201 @default.
• W2217187352 creator A5064384167 @default.
• W2217187352 date "2020-09-03" @default.
• W2217187352 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2217187352 title "Shaping The Self Efficacy Beliefs Of First Year Engineering Students: What Is The Role We Play?" @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1496710155 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1553412851 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1562208008 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1967041140 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1967931107 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1977230736 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1987554188 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1990362633 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W1998788270 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2005687602 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2009880757 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2021027762 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2030318182 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2030768171 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2031445243 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2050223782 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2057873451 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2057960049 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2065967195 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2077485109 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2087263326 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2088288972 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2103080710 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2111638337 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2119927950 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2126015997 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2162221567 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2179683524 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2519943106 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2614061138 @default.
• W2217187352 cites W2888190061 @default.
• W2217187352 doi "https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--14718" @default.
• W2217187352 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2217187352 type Work @default.
• W2217187352 sameAs 2217187352 @default.
• W2217187352 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2217187352 countsByYear W22171873522020 @default.
• W2217187352 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2217187352 hasAuthorship W2217187352A5034815385 @default.
• W2217187352 hasAuthorship W2217187352A5047731201 @default.
• W2217187352 hasAuthorship W2217187352A5064384167 @default.
• W2217187352 hasBestOaLocation W22171873522 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C110131835 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C5041995 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C110131835 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C127413603 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C145420912 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C15744967 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C2776035688 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C46312422 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C5041995 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C509550671 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C71924100 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C77805123 @default.
• W2217187352 hasConceptScore W2217187352C78519656 @default.
• W2217187352 hasLocation W22171873521 @default.
• W2217187352 hasLocation W22171873522 @default.
• W2217187352 hasLocation W22171873523 @default.
• W2217187352 hasOpenAccess W2217187352 @default.
• W2217187352 hasPrimaryLocation W22171873521 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W1999865470 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W2039344858 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W2043914659 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W2049133647 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W2132333037 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W2763187446 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W4235708563 @default.
• W2217187352 hasRelatedWork W4321352703 @default.
• W2217187352 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2217187352 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2217187352 magId "2217187352" @default.
• W2217187352 workType "article" @default.