FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2218435475> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2218435475 endingPage "046002" @default.
• W2218435475 startingPage "046002" @default.
• W2218435475 abstract "Currently, many different methods are being used for pre-processing, statistical analysis and validation of data obtained by electronic nose technology from exhaled air. These various methods, however, have never been thoroughly compared. We aimed to empirically evaluate and compare the influence of different dimension reduction, classification and validation methods found in published studies on the diagnostic performance in several datasets. Our objective was to facilitate the selection of appropriate statistical methods and to support reviewers in this research area. We reviewed the literature by searching Pubmed up to the end of 2014 for all human studies using an electronic nose and methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool tailored to our review. Forty-six studies were evaluated regarding the range of different approaches to dimension reduction, classification and validation. From forty-six reviewed articles only seven applied external validation in an independent dataset, mostly with a case-control design. We asked their authors to share the original datasets with us. Four of the seven datasets were available for re-analysis. Published statistical methods for eNose signal analysis found in the literature review were applied to the training set of each dataset. The performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC)) was calculated for the training cohort (in-set) and after internal validation (leave-one-out cross validation). The methods were also applied to the external validation set to assess the external validity of the performance. Risk of bias was high in most studies due to non-random selection of patients. Internal validation resulted in a decrease in ROC-AUCs compared to in-set performance: -0.15,-0.14,-0.1,-0.11 in dataset 1 through 4, respectively. External validation resulted in lower ROC-AUC compared to internal validation in dataset 1 (-0.23) and 3 (-0.09). ROC-AUCs did not decrease in dataset 2 (+0.07) and 4 (+0.04). No single combination of dimension reduction and classification methods gave consistent results between internal and external validation sets in this sample of four datasets. This empirical evaluation showed that it is not meaningful to estimate the diagnostic performance on a training set alone, even after internal validation. Therefore, we recommend the inclusion of an external validation set in all future eNose projects in medicine." @default.
• W2218435475 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5013315693 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5018207361 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5021762566 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5031564190 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5050564103 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5056170822 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5062267690 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5075388940 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5081302632 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5085347081 @default.
• W2218435475 creator A5088877952 @default.
• W2218435475 date "2015-12-15" @default.
• W2218435475 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2218435475 title "Comparison of classification methods in breath analysis by electronic nose" @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1547176350 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1556607358 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1567045864 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1838047381 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1964514280 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1970651029 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1974299154 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1980843561 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1983802901 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1985297983 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1989438688 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1992747532 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1994905463 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1997192661 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W1997650144 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2000196944 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2003176591 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2006170372 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2007698831 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2012558417 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2020991391 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2024773014 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2034662626 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2036953109 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2045917834 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2046021885 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2046499926 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2051411536 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2057526091 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2058997735 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2059941831 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2060315146 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2063872198 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2070262574 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2074325744 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2078271269 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2084164487 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2084194943 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2084912879 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2089343126 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2089463633 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2105021850 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2107610392 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2107638293 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2108110937 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2108186931 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2114311291 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2116349217 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2118045199 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2124242256 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2124721964 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2127646612 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2128381763 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2129152887 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2129427326 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2132852271 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2136310313 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2138581372 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2142635246 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2143283561 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2144379247 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2151166219 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2153118690 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2156892464 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2163117853 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2167549681 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2170590937 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2172048551 @default.
• W2218435475 cites W2333035147 @default.
• W2218435475 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/9/4/046002" @default.
• W2218435475 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26669708" @default.
• W2218435475 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2218435475 type Work @default.
• W2218435475 sameAs 2218435475 @default.
• W2218435475 citedByCount "63" @default.
• W2218435475 countsByYear W22184354752016 @default.
• W2218435475 countsByYear W22184354752017 @default.
• W2218435475 countsByYear W22184354752018 @default.
• W2218435475 countsByYear W22184354752019 @default.
• W2218435475 countsByYear W22184354752020 @default.
• W2218435475 countsByYear W22184354752021 @default.
• W2218435475 countsByYear W22184354752022 @default.

• next