Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2225931427> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2225931427 abstract "Background. Red Lists have been traditionally used as the instruments to guide conservation strategies to avoid extinctions. There is little objection to the idea that categorizing species according to their risk of extinction is a good way to prioritize and implement conservation actions; however, there is little consensus in the best way to do this categorization, and different countries have developed different methods according to their specific needs. The scope of this paper is to contrast the Mexican Risk of Extinction Assessment Method (MER) and the one used by the IUCN Red List, and test how simple, objective and transparent are them. Methods. In order to compare the we performed a search within IUCN´s data base to find species ranked as critically endangered which have not been assessed by the MER. We picked 5 species from the rodent genus Habromys and performed a literature review to assess them through the MER guidelines; we then compared the outcomes with UICN Red List. Results. The five assessed species of cloud forest rodents yield equivalent results through both the MER and IUCN assessments; however, the information asked for by the MER was scant for all the species, and we argue that the results of the assessments are thus not entirely objectives. Moreover, we found that the MER is not a simple method to use due to ambiguities of the criteria. Discussion. The aim of risk assessments is to clearly define the conservation status of a given species, displayed in a simple, transparent, objective, way, which can be relevant in terms of scope and impact on conservation actions. Unfortunately the MER does not fulfil all these requirements, potentially compromising conservation actions. As a result, we propose that it is time reevaluate the current version of the Mexican Risk of Extinction Assessment Method." @default.
- W2225931427 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2225931427 creator A5021617194 @default.
- W2225931427 creator A5087514673 @default.
- W2225931427 date "2015-11-19" @default.
- W2225931427 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2225931427 title "A comparison between risk assessments methods: assessing five species of cloud forest rodents in Mexico" @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1545604506 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1584008048 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1598520032 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1833497713 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1849251138 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1915870823 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1963652276 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1966591937 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1967573034 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1981641854 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1982813313 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W1984633148 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2002972605 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2006221257 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2009770008 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2017950295 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2026916448 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2031668037 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2034094240 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2039734191 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2043752240 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2047622159 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2053533743 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2053754804 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2056109939 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2062574124 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2089988804 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2091348826 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2095605992 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2102017831 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2106854615 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2109593356 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2143454005 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2144610869 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2150633936 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2167967290 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2168740217 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2168961780 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2497293969 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2528484528 @default.
- W2225931427 cites W2981278767 @default.
- W2225931427 doi "https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1437v2" @default.
- W2225931427 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2225931427 type Work @default.
- W2225931427 sameAs 2225931427 @default.
- W2225931427 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2225931427 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2225931427 hasAuthorship W2225931427A5021617194 @default.
- W2225931427 hasAuthorship W2225931427A5087514673 @default.
- W2225931427 hasBestOaLocation W22259314271 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C101991246 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C155461473 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C179345059 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C23519681 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C2780737616 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C43827410 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C61782394 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConcept C94124525 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C101991246 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C107826830 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C151730666 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C154945302 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C155461473 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C179345059 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C185933670 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C18903297 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C199360897 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C205649164 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C23519681 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C2778012447 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C2780737616 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C39432304 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C41008148 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C43827410 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C61782394 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C86803240 @default.
- W2225931427 hasConceptScore W2225931427C94124525 @default.
- W2225931427 hasLocation W22259314271 @default.
- W2225931427 hasOpenAccess W2225931427 @default.
- W2225931427 hasPrimaryLocation W22259314271 @default.
- W2225931427 hasRelatedWork W2041344751 @default.
- W2225931427 hasRelatedWork W2081755484 @default.