Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2225962883> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2225962883 endingPage "1871" @default.
- W2225962883 startingPage "1859" @default.
- W2225962883 abstract "Purpose: This systematic literature review aimed at examining the validity and applicability in everyday clinical rehabilitation practise of methods for the assessment of back muscle fatiguability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP).Methods: Extensive research was performed in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from their inception to September 2014. Potentially relevant articles were also manually looked for in the reference lists of the identified publications. Studies examining lumbar muscle fatigue in people with CNSLBP were selected. Two reviewers independently selected the articles, carried out the study quality assessment and extracted the results. A modified Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) scale was used to evaluate the scientific rigour of the selected works.Results: Twenty-four studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review. We found conflicting data regarding the validity of methods used to examine back muscle fatigue. The Biering-Sorensen test, performed in conjunction with surface electromyography spectral analysis, turned out to be the most widely used and comparatively, the most optimal modality currently available to assess objective back muscle fatigue in daily clinical practise, even though critical limitations are discussed.Conclusions: Future research should address the identification of an advanced method for lower back fatigue assessment in patients with CNSLBP which, eventually, might provide physical therapists with an objective and reliable test usable in everyday clinical practise.Implications for RehabilitationDespite its limitations, the Biering-Sorensen test is currently the most used, convenient and easily available fatiguing test for lumbar muscles.To increase validity and reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test, concomitant activation of synergistic muscles should be taken into account.Pooled mean frequency and half-width of the spectrum are currently the most valid electromyographic parameters to assess fatigue in chronic non-specific low back pain.Body mass index, grading of pain and level of disability of the study population should be reported to enhance research quality." @default.
- W2225962883 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2225962883 creator A5001147103 @default.
- W2225962883 creator A5004013985 @default.
- W2225962883 creator A5014533119 @default.
- W2225962883 creator A5015811606 @default.
- W2225962883 creator A5029523168 @default.
- W2225962883 creator A5042293053 @default.
- W2225962883 creator A5067842289 @default.
- W2225962883 date "2016-01-05" @default.
- W2225962883 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W2225962883 title "Validity and everyday clinical applicability of lumbar muscle fatigue assessment methods in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review" @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1141900827 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1496110241 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1583832438 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1602603155 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1932829252 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1964143756 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1966128258 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1970577413 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1977849332 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1982354050 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1986309799 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1994252051 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W1995211373 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2004153291 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2030430403 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2039754206 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2041157378 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2041418763 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2043072601 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2044123693 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2051865529 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2053226905 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2056426841 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2058926536 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2071368126 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2074448128 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2076555084 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2079433682 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2081149738 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2084880898 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2086059224 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2088895091 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2105101383 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2118516436 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2118848757 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2120080272 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2123945981 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2137247767 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2143891522 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2165576589 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2296491914 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2407580748 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W2885373553 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W3022903699 @default.
- W2225962883 cites W4317639928 @default.
- W2225962883 doi "https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1107777" @default.
- W2225962883 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26732899" @default.
- W2225962883 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2225962883 type Work @default.
- W2225962883 sameAs 2225962883 @default.
- W2225962883 citedByCount "33" @default.
- W2225962883 countsByYear W22259628832017 @default.
- W2225962883 countsByYear W22259628832018 @default.
- W2225962883 countsByYear W22259628832019 @default.
- W2225962883 countsByYear W22259628832020 @default.
- W2225962883 countsByYear W22259628832021 @default.
- W2225962883 countsByYear W22259628832022 @default.
- W2225962883 countsByYear W22259628832023 @default.
- W2225962883 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2225962883 hasAuthorship W2225962883A5001147103 @default.
- W2225962883 hasAuthorship W2225962883A5004013985 @default.
- W2225962883 hasAuthorship W2225962883A5014533119 @default.
- W2225962883 hasAuthorship W2225962883A5015811606 @default.
- W2225962883 hasAuthorship W2225962883A5029523168 @default.
- W2225962883 hasAuthorship W2225962883A5042293053 @default.
- W2225962883 hasAuthorship W2225962883A5067842289 @default.
- W2225962883 hasBestOaLocation W22259628832 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
- W2225962883 hasConceptScore W2225962883C141071460 @default.