Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2231335907> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 60 of
60
with 100 items per page.
- W2231335907 startingPage "1549" @default.
- W2231335907 abstract "Table of ContentsI. Introduction 1550II. Development of Personal Jurisdiction Law: Goodyear to Daimler 1554A. Pre-Goodyear Personal Jurisdiction 1554B. General Personal Jurisdiction After Goodyear.......1558C. General Personal Jurisdiction After Daimler.........1560III. Retroactivity and Exceptions to Retroactivity 1564A. Adjudicative Retroactivity Versus Legislative Retroactivity 1564B. General Rule for Adjudicative Retroactivity 1567C. Retroactivity in the Personal Jurisdiction Context 1574IV. Permitting Defendants to Raise the Daimler Test in Long-Pending Cases 1577A. Two Categories of Cases Affected by the Daimler Decision 15771. First Category: When the Defendant Raised a Rule 12(b)(2) Defense Before Daimler 15772. Second Category: When the Defendant Did Not Raise a Rule 12(b)(2) Defense Before Daimler 1578B. Consequences of Applying the Daimler Decision in Long-Pending Cases 1586V. Conclusion 1591I. IntroductionIf it's a new test, why can't they use it?1This comment by Judge George B. Daniels of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York fits a wealth of controversy into just a few words.2 3 With the Supreme Court's apparent limiting of general personal jurisdiction in Daimler AG v. Bauman3 in January of 2014, defendants across the country began attempts to have the cases against them dismissed on the grounds that the particular courts could no longer exercise general personal jurisdiction over them.4 5 These defendants believe that the Daimler interpretation of general personal jurisdiction fundamentally changed the previously controlling Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown5 test, and several judges in federal district courts agree.6 Spurring the controversy, however, are judges operating under the assumption that Daimler did not change the already existing Goodyear test and thus, denying dismissals to other defendants in the same situation.7 Judge Daniels's position depends on the assumption-one that he thinks is obvious-that Daimler did create a new test.8 The problem, however, is that others persuasively argue that the Daimler and Goodyear tests are the same.9 Apart from the issue of whether Daimler created a new test, Judge Daniels's comment also encapsulates the separate issue of whether-even if Daimler created a new test-defendants are entitled to relief under the new case, especially if they have already waived the personal jurisdiction defense of Rule 12(b)(2).10 This Note proceeds by reconciling these two issues in an attempt to propose the correct outcome for litigants regarding the treatment of Daimler in longpending cases.* 11The Supreme Court's ruling in Daimler was a further development of Goodyear and personal jurisdiction law.12 In delivering the Court's ruling, Justice Ginsburg declared, [T]he inquiry under Goodyear is not whether a foreign corporation's inforum contacts can be said to be in some sense ?continuous and systematic,' it is whether that corporation's ?affiliations with the State are so continuous and systematic as to render [it] essentially at home in the forum State.'13 Despite the apparent intention to clarify the existing law on general jurisdiction, the Daimler ruling incited disagreement as to the extent the Goodyear rule changed as a result of Daimler and even as to whether Daimler changed the Goodyear rule at all. …" @default.
- W2231335907 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2231335907 creator A5071966024 @default.
- W2231335907 date "2015-07-01" @default.
- W2231335907 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2231335907 title "New Limits on General Personal Jurisdiction: Examining the Retroactive Application of Daimler in Long-Pending Cases" @default.
- W2231335907 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2231335907 type Work @default.
- W2231335907 sameAs 2231335907 @default.
- W2231335907 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2231335907 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2231335907 hasAuthorship W2231335907A5071966024 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C2778495862 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C144024400 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C166957645 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C17744445 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C199539241 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C2776949292 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C2778272461 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C2778495862 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C2779343474 @default.
- W2231335907 hasConceptScore W2231335907C95457728 @default.
- W2231335907 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2231335907 hasLocation W22313359071 @default.
- W2231335907 hasOpenAccess W2231335907 @default.
- W2231335907 hasPrimaryLocation W22313359071 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W1444627403 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W1510378020 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W1555620157 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W2095239650 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W225719872 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W2262617141 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W2269699112 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W2289418722 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W266784705 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W2752285957 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W3033421596 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W3122937922 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W3125030736 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W3205772011 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W3205832611 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W332996050 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W339657975 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W853391707 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W2611864736 @default.
- W2231335907 hasRelatedWork W312593811 @default.
- W2231335907 hasVolume "72" @default.
- W2231335907 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2231335907 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2231335907 magId "2231335907" @default.
- W2231335907 workType "article" @default.