FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W223555890> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W223555890 startingPage "44" @default.
• W223555890 abstract "[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] you, as a manager, think about the possibility of getting sued, the content in your company s e-mail system might not come flooding--flight or fright style--to mind first or even second in a mounting list of concerns. Then again, perhaps it should, because you might need to turn over specific e-mails in court. First, a bit of back-story for the unfamiliar: The year 2006 has e-mail-related significance to compliance officers and legal experts. This is because, generally speaking, it was when changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) codified how those electronic missives flurrying among our Outlook, Entourage, and similar in-boxes should be managed in what experts refer to as both pre- and post-discovery condition. (Meaning, how, as a matter of general daily practice a bank should be storing and managing e-mails pre suit, and, how they should retrieve e-mails and documents should a suit occur.) Since the new eDiscovery rules, activity has jumped up. Indeed, among small businesses with less than 5,000 employees, the percentage of respondents who said that their company had been involved in a legal proceeding necessitating e-record search and retrieval rose to 64% from 56% from 2005 to 2007, according to Milford, Mass.-based Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG), which looks at storage and information management topics. Among enterprise enterprises with 20,000 or more employees, the effect was more pronounced, up 20 percentage points to 67% from 47%. It could be that employees are simply more aware of the steady state of litigation. However, Brian Babineau, a senior analyst at ESG, believes survey results point to an increase in discovery, that is, searching for e-mails, attachments, and related transaction detail in response to a request by attorneys representing private parties or governmental entities taking part in a legal proceeding. Since 2006, then, many in banking who have legal, IT, and compliance responsibilities have been thinking about how to make the communication tool less one of expedience and more of an archive. After all, e-mail has come to undergird business, become a kind of fingerprint of its activity. Blame it on Martha In some sense, e-mail's presence in the court is merely a sign of changing business habits and practices. Today, e-mail is a leading source of documentation about transactions and work flow, and it stands as a key source of transaction commentary and validation, says eDiscovery expert and attorney Craig Ball. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] In another sense, the radical rise in the importance of e-mail can be explained directly by Marthagate, Enron, and other cases that established precedent in recent years, says ESG's Babineau. When e-mail proved to be so useful in court, more attorneys began using it. Now, use has become a norm, he adds. The ESG analyst says in the months ahead, subprime-related legal matters will force most institutions that lend--regardless of size--to begin rethinking how they handle e-mail. Basically, the it's just too hard to manage excuse won't hold (as it hasn't for Wall Street for some time). Stephen Ludlow, senior program manager, eDiscovery solutions at enterprise content management vendor, OpenText, based in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, agrees that subprime litigation will be a driver both for more suits and for more types of organizations to adopt e-mail-specific management systems as well as improving their overall records-management strategies. Not that banks, particularly large ones, haven't been, in some sense, ready to rumble, prepared for e-mail's new legal exposures. As part of the general cost of e-mail management and preparedness for eDiscovery, companies generally have to figure out such details as whether to outsource the eDiscovery process, in effect, paying outsiders to search the electronic files in the event of a suit, which is costly. …" @default.
• W223555890 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W223555890 creator A5087348624 @default.
• W223555890 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W223555890 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W223555890 title "Risky Business, eDiscovery, and IT: How E-Mail Went from an Expedient Tool to an Archive of Record and a Wild West of Records Management. What Steps to Take Now" @default.
• W223555890 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W223555890 type Work @default.
• W223555890 sameAs 223555890 @default.
• W223555890 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W223555890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W223555890 hasAuthorship W223555890A5087348624 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W223555890 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C108827166 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C136764020 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C144133560 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C15744967 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C162853370 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C17744445 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C199539241 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C2780876879 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C39549134 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C41008148 @default.
• W223555890 hasConceptScore W223555890C542102704 @default.
• W223555890 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W223555890 hasLocation W2235558901 @default.
• W223555890 hasOpenAccess W223555890 @default.
• W223555890 hasPrimaryLocation W2235558901 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W1497249439 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W1532602276 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W1803459248 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W2037653777 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W2133897903 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W2294213922 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W2313543728 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W250409221 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W270928705 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W280051687 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W285787345 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W300562956 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W325496082 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W341687895 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W349373469 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W809442100 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W98708067 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W16399049 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W217801441 @default.
• W223555890 hasRelatedWork W2606284180 @default.
• W223555890 hasVolume "100" @default.
• W223555890 isParatext "false" @default.
• W223555890 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W223555890 magId "223555890" @default.
• W223555890 workType "article" @default.