FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2242709623> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2242709623 abstract "Recent immigration scholarship has identified two features of current immigration enforcement: the “federalization” of immigration law – meaning the growing participation of state and local police in immigration enforcement – and “crimmigration – the increasing use of immigration law as a strategy for crime control. Scholars argue that these trends are new and that they have had a negative effect on immigration regulation. By contrast, supporters of state and local immigration enforcement point out that police officers can serve as a powerful “force multiplier” by funneling the highest priority illegal aliens – criminal aliens – into the federal immigration system. They argue that this won’t change the shape of ordinary law enforcement. Neither side is correct. On the one hand, neither of these features is particularly new. For decades, federal immigration officials have been partnering with state and local officials and for nearly 100 years federal law has provided for deportation based on conviction of certain crimes. What is new is that enhanced funding and expanded programing has enlarged the scope of state and local participation and thrust it into public view. On the other hand, proponents of state and local police as “force multipliers” underestimate the extent to which this increased participation distorts both federal immigration enforcement policy and state and local law enforcement policy. These distortions result primarily from one salient feature of the merged system: the fact that state and local police involved in immigration enforcement make front-end law enforcement decisions in light of the promise of back-end immigration enforcement. This has led to the use of pre-textual stops and arrests ostensibly for traffic violations or minor crimes but actually for the purpose of feeding suspected illegal aliens into the immigration enforcement system. This article demonstrates how pre-textual enforcement actions distort federal and state/local enforcement priorities and undermine political accountability. They also lead, almost inevitably, to racial profiling that is largely impervious to legal and constitutional challenge. Assuming, as I do, that immigration policing and crimmigration are here to stay, the challenge is to harness the “force multiplier” of state and local enforcement without creating the dysfunction that can accompany it. The key is to find ways to decouple state and local law enforcement decisions from the promise of immigration enforcement. This article identifies some promising responses in this direction by ICE and state and local law enforcement agencies. While these early efforts are inadequate, they may point the way forward in a world in which immigration federalism and crimmigration are here to stay." @default.
• W2242709623 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2242709623 creator A5052509180 @default.
• W2242709623 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2242709623 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2242709623 title "Immigration Policing: Federalizing the Local" @default.
• W2242709623 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2242709623 type Work @default.
• W2242709623 sameAs 2242709623 @default.
• W2242709623 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2242709623 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2242709623 hasAuthorship W2242709623A5052509180 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C111141941 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C204207695 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C60961049 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConcept C70036468 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C111141941 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C11413529 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C17744445 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C199539241 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C204207695 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C2779777834 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C2780262971 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C41008148 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C48103436 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C60961049 @default.
• W2242709623 hasConceptScore W2242709623C70036468 @default.
• W2242709623 hasLocation W22427096231 @default.
• W2242709623 hasOpenAccess W2242709623 @default.
• W2242709623 hasPrimaryLocation W22427096231 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W140462459 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W1483284581 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W1523879737 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W1604283059 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W1898917949 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W2277437814 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W2338765182 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W2344059106 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W2517846106 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W263110792 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W2963710824 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W3122333974 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W3123788210 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W3124233786 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W3125490348 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W3125529704 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W335159786 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W82717603 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W831275680 @default.
• W2242709623 hasRelatedWork W219294649 @default.
• W2242709623 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2242709623 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2242709623 magId "2242709623" @default.
• W2242709623 workType "article" @default.