FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2242865105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2242865105 abstract "The perfect is the enemy of the good. Could the approach to section 9 laid out in Grant have been constructed differently? Yes. But are we, because of that decision, magnitudes of order clearer on how to approach section 9? Also yes. The Supreme Court's decision in Grant, seemingly the product of careful negotiation given the time it has taken for the judgment to be handed down in a fashion having a clear majority, has created what has for over 25 years been lacking with regard to detention. Where before we had very few decisions, those decisions not easily reconcilable with each other, and lower courts forced to create their own doctrine on unresolved issues, we now have an overarching framework which can be applied. Questions remain unresolved, but it is now clear what approach to take in resolving them. Grant is to section 9 what Hunter v. Southam is to section 8.Prior to this, there were very few clear rules around section 9. The Court had defined as a discretion with criteria, express or implied, which govern its exercise. This was not merely one way of being it was offered and applied as the meaning of arbitrariness. Although this was the definition, however, lower courts frequently had to deal with situations in which powers to detain were misused: not applied without criteria, but applied based on improper criteria. Other Supreme Court decisions suggested in passing that improperly used powers could result in an detention, though they did not reconcile this possibility with, or even mention, the definition. The difficulty here is that a stop based on something like racial profiling seems obviously to violate section 9, but it is not a detention based on no criteria — quite the opposite. Further related to the meaning of arbitrary, it was not clear what the relationship between unlawfulness and arbitrariness was. It had been decided that a lawful detention was not though exactly how that rule was to interact with the suggestion that misuse of a legal power could make a detention had not been discussed. It had not been decided — indeed, it had been deliberately left undecided — whether an unlawful detention was by nature arbitrary. Many lower courts had concluded that a detention could fail to comply with the law but still not have been arbitrary: that something more than mere unlawfulness was needed to make a detention arbitrary. If that was true, it was not clear exactly what more was needed. If that was not true, it was unclear how one would relate two different rules, which might well conflict: arbitrary equals no and arbitrary equals unlawful." @default.
• W2242865105 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2242865105 creator A5025760550 @default.
• W2242865105 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2242865105 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2242865105 title "Great Strides in Section 9 Jurisprudence" @default.
• W2242865105 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2242865105 type Work @default.
• W2242865105 sameAs 2242865105 @default.
• W2242865105 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2242865105 countsByYear W22428651052013 @default.
• W2242865105 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2242865105 hasAuthorship W2242865105A5025760550 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C2777451423 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C2777632292 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C111472728 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C111919701 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C138885662 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C144024400 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C17744445 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C190253527 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C199539241 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C2776211767 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C2777451423 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C2777632292 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C2778272461 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C2780129039 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C2780876879 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C41008148 @default.
• W2242865105 hasConceptScore W2242865105C71043370 @default.
• W2242865105 hasLocation W22428651051 @default.
• W2242865105 hasOpenAccess W2242865105 @default.
• W2242865105 hasPrimaryLocation W22428651051 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W1500640847 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W1534636804 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W1543516279 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W1573234990 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W182411917 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W1913287020 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W1969180512 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2039981008 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2127108066 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W220031618 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2269778463 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2286322069 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2316265919 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2317787259 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2613778613 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W2977667397 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W3123533165 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W3125653888 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W45395194 @default.
• W2242865105 hasRelatedWork W1901849816 @default.
• W2242865105 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2242865105 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2242865105 magId "2242865105" @default.
• W2242865105 workType "article" @default.