FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2244288247> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2244288247 startingPage "28" @default.
• W2244288247 abstract "The intent of this paper is to respond to refutations set forth in Bailey, Jaggars, and Scott-Clayton's paper, Characterizing the Effectiveness of Developmental Education: A Response to Recent Criticism (2013), which is a response (see also,COMMENTARY, pg. 18) to our initial paper, Addressing Flawed Research in Developmental Education (2012). However, before we go any further, we would like to take the time to make an important distinction that may not have been explicitly clear in our initial work.The Community College Research Center (CCRC) of Columbia University, established in 1996, is an organization whose mission is to contribute to the development of practice and policy that expands access to higher education and promotes success for all (CCRC, 2013, para. 2). Even though we may disagree with a few of the CCRC's conclusions regarding developmental education as a whole, we do in fact agree with and support not only their mission but the overwhelming majority of their research as well. Their intent is genuine, their research is sound, and thus there should be no question of their integrity.Regrettably, organizations have cited the CCRC and others' research to promote radical changes to developmental education, such as abolishing prerequisite remedial courses and replacing them with corequisite courses, much like a law passed recently by the Connecticut State Legislature (An Act Concerning, 2012). Fortunately the CCRC does not agree with this course of action. In their response, Bailey et al. (2013) clearly state, do not advocate-nor do we believe that the results of our research support-the elimination of developmental education, the placing of all students into college courses, or the wholesale conversion of developmental education into a corequisite model (p. 2).As researchers and academics, we believe in a healthy and critical exchange of ideas, and it is in this spirit that we wish to simultaneously support our colleagues at the CCRC yet add to this important dialogue. The following comments therefore attempt to define our disagreements more clearly so that readers may be more informed about our position. More importantly, with this paper and others, we hope students, parents, educators, legislators, and researchers can learn about and build upon the corpus of community college research so that all constituents can accomplish and maintain the shared goal of student success at the postsecondary level.A Basic RDD Flaw: What the Treatment Should AccomplishThe CCRC's researchers have contributed to and continually reference a body of work they rely upon to argue that developmental education is ineffective overall for students in community colleges and four-year institutions. One problem with this assessment is that it defines developmental education exclusively in terms of remedial courses. Scholars in the field (Arendale, 2012; Boylan, 1999) generally define developmental education as the integration of courses and academic support services guided by the principles of adult learning and development. However, criticisms leveled against developmental education may instead actually focus only on remedial courses, which may or may not be guided by the principles of adult learning and development. It is incorrect, therefore, to say that developmental education as a whole is ineffective.Nevertheless, their sole evidence for claims of remediation's inefficacy are the results from quasi-experimental analyses of various longitudinal datasets. These studies are called regression discontinuity design (RDD) studies, and since approximately seven or eight RDD studies from varying levels of cutoffs show mostly null or negative results, then the CCRC argues that developmental education has no positive effect overall. We previously addressed their use of what we believe to be an incorrect definition of success. The CCRC's response dismissed our definition and reasserted their original position. …" @default.
• W2244288247 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2244288247 creator A5012181309 @default.
• W2244288247 creator A5036766385 @default.
• W2244288247 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W2244288247 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2244288247 title "A Brief Response to Bailey, Jaggars, and Scott-Clayton" @default.
• W2244288247 cites W1489743522 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W1512794714 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W157449371 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W1648286042 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W1730782591 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W1941574450 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W1942891847 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2063022356 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2077173143 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2113551921 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2144118204 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2145959406 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2158802982 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2588036520 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2765091483 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W2889815668 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W3125244926 @default.
• W2244288247 cites W3125367243 @default.
• W2244288247 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2244288247 type Work @default.
• W2244288247 sameAs 2244288247 @default.
• W2244288247 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2244288247 countsByYear W22442882472020 @default.
• W2244288247 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2244288247 hasAuthorship W2244288247A5012181309 @default.
• W2244288247 hasAuthorship W2244288247A5036766385 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C100207952 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C100207952 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C11413529 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C120912362 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C144024400 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C145420912 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C15744967 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C177264268 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C17744445 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C199360897 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C199539241 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C41008148 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C48103436 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C7991579 @default.
• W2244288247 hasConceptScore W2244288247C83009810 @default.
• W2244288247 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2244288247 hasLocation W22442882471 @default.
• W2244288247 hasOpenAccess W2244288247 @default.
• W2244288247 hasPrimaryLocation W22442882471 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W110640639 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W123868477 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W1496703630 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W151873223 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W1540697641 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W1973275595 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W1980838708 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W1995135742 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2025882631 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2113721892 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2172605458 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2186456206 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2330689252 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2335512577 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W240069953 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2406782028 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2467820616 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2557564400 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W2781892316 @default.
• W2244288247 hasRelatedWork W778676200 @default.
• W2244288247 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W2244288247 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2244288247 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2244288247 magId "2244288247" @default.
• W2244288247 workType "article" @default.