FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2245461170> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2245461170 endingPage "353" @default.
• W2245461170 startingPage "339" @default.
• W2245461170 abstract "Universities have become important components of the national innovation systems in innovation driven economies. To strengthen the university related flow of mainly technological knowledge into commercialized products many European countries have followed the American example and changed from an inventor-ownership system to a university-owned system (Genua & Rossi, 2011). Today most European countries have adopted a university-ownership system but with varying characteristics (Genua & Rossi, 2011). One of the strongest effects of changing to a university-owned system is a strengthening of the university support structures especially the founding or expansion of a Technology-Transfer organization (TTO). Most research indicates an increased output of patent applications, university-owned patents and license deals from the European universities (Genua & Rossi, 2011; Siegel et al, 2007). Will the university owned system give privilege to patents and license deals instead of trying to capture a higher value from university ownership in a university spinout as Kenney & Patton’s (2009; 2011) research indicate? The Scandinavian countries have since a decade changed university laws, policies and allocated specific resources in order to stimulate commercialization of university research. While Denmark and Norway changed intellectual property laws in favor of university ownership and pushed for commercialization early in the 2000's, Sweden retained the professor’s privilege system or university inventor system. The paper reports on a survey of Scandinavian universities’ technology-transfer offices regarding their patenting, licensing and university-spin-off activities in the years from 2000 to 2012. Results show an increase in commercialization activities in Denmark and Norway confirming earlier results by Genua and Rossi (2011). The Danish development shows a clear increase of patenting and licensing activity but a stagnation of university spin-outs. The Norwegian development is less clear but also here a pattern of more licensing and stagnation of spinouts is visible. In contrast Swedish universities’ TTO-systems are organized for spinouts and produce mostly university spinouts. Patenting is done also in Sweden but primarily in conjunction with the spinout process. Moreover, pure licensing deals are rare in the Swedish system. The study provides some support for Kenney and Patton’s (2009; 2011) results that university owned systems favour the business model of patenting and licensing while university inventor systems favour the business model of spinoffs. This study does however note the effect of other factors than the university intellectual property regime as important in the development. These are government initiatives and resource allocations for university commercialization, the capabilities of the TTO and the universities’ choice of commercialization support structure. (Less)" @default.
• W2245461170 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2245461170 creator A5029360656 @default.
• W2245461170 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2245461170 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2245461170 title "Comparing University-Ownership Technology Transfer Systems With University-Inventor Technology Transfer Systems In Scandinavian Universities – A Question Of Focusing On Licensing Or Spin-Off Business Models?" @default.
• W2245461170 cites W1534902858 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W1998810036 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2014049116 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2020788454 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2043561183 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2048287230 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2057415295 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2103157954 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2159456265 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W2171296837 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W3023708423 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W3122576053 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W3122642094 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W3123060648 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W3123597226 @default.
• W2245461170 cites W44527850 @default.
• W2245461170 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2245461170 type Work @default.
• W2245461170 sameAs 2245461170 @default.
• W2245461170 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2245461170 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2245461170 hasAuthorship W2245461170A5029360656 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C2776960227 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C2777638134 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C2778965292 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C2780138299 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C2780560020 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C2780625559 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C2985879086 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C10138342 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C120912362 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C136264566 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C144133560 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C155202549 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C162324750 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C162853370 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C17744445 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C182306322 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C187736073 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C199539241 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C2776960227 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C2777638134 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C2778965292 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C2780138299 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C2780560020 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C2780625559 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C2985879086 @default.
• W2245461170 hasConceptScore W2245461170C34974158 @default.
• W2245461170 hasLocation W22454611701 @default.
• W2245461170 hasOpenAccess W2245461170 @default.
• W2245461170 hasPrimaryLocation W22454611701 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W1535618918 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W1587195447 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W1614824054 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W1829520087 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W1904608292 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2033774002 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2057415295 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2059753613 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2064782026 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2110971797 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2158518034 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2159738471 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2170476517 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2277354913 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2283798593 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2572520037 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W2790440702 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W3121647093 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W3123326761 @default.
• W2245461170 hasRelatedWork W3124885476 @default.
• W2245461170 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2245461170 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2245461170 magId "2245461170" @default.
• W2245461170 workType "article" @default.