Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2247190589> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 59 of
59
with 100 items per page.
- W2247190589 endingPage "50" @default.
- W2247190589 startingPage "43" @default.
- W2247190589 abstract "Student–industry activities are often heralded as win–win–win activities in which students gain knowledge of their future professional fields, companies access student knowledge, and universities both offer students stimulating learning opportunities and strengthen ties with industry. Student–industry projects can be defined as an active learning methodology characterized by pedagogical values such as improving student understanding of the concepts, motivation, interest in the subject, and work efficiency (Barak, 2009). Biggs and Tang (2009) find that a stimulating learning environment relies on three main components: 1. an open environment, 2. worthwhile tasks, and 3. demands that students can realistically hope to meet. In the same vein, Perkins (1991) stresses the importance of learners’ attitudes towards the learning situation and of students’ “buying in” to the instruction agenda, factors that are much more easily stimulated when students are confronted with real problems by stakeholders than when presented with constructed problems in simulated situations. Leenders and Maufette-Leenders (2010) argue that a fictitious scenario will not appear credible and not engage students the way an authentic situation does. Authentic learning “focuses on real-world, complex problems and their solutions” (Lombardi, 2007, p. 2), and introduction into a professional environment helps students become “enculturated” into the discipline, a crucial concept according to Lave and Wenger, as “a training program that consists of instructional settings separated from actual performance would tend to split the learner’s ability to manage the learning situation apart from his ability to perform the skill” (1991). University representatives generally agree that student–industry activities make students more employable after graduation (Dawson et al., 1997). Seen in this light, one may wonder why so many student–industry activities are established, only to survive a few iterations. Student–industry activities are by no means homogenous, and include a wide variety of collaboration models ranging from short undemanding meetings between students and industry representatives to long complex relationships demanding considerable effort from universities, companies, and students alike. We have no reason to believe that the success factors for these widely divergent collaboration models are identical. In approaching the concept of “success”, we find it desirable to distinguish between various student–industry activities in a defined framework. In the project management field, critical success factors are often discussed and identified (Pinto and Prescott, 1988; Westerveld, 2003); to better the odds of survival of student–industry activities, the same needs to be done in the field of university–industry collaboration to create more stable student–industry activities. (Less)" @default.
- W2247190589 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2247190589 creator A5013921767 @default.
- W2247190589 creator A5063136385 @default.
- W2247190589 date "2011-01-01" @default.
- W2247190589 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2247190589 title "The Blurred Line Between Failure and Success in Student–Industry Projects" @default.
- W2247190589 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2247190589 type Work @default.
- W2247190589 sameAs 2247190589 @default.
- W2247190589 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2247190589 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2247190589 hasAuthorship W2247190589A5013921767 @default.
- W2247190589 hasAuthorship W2247190589A5063136385 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C77967617 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C127413603 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C145420912 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C154945302 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C15744967 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C18762648 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C19417346 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C41008148 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C77967617 @default.
- W2247190589 hasConceptScore W2247190589C78519656 @default.
- W2247190589 hasOpenAccess W2247190589 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W1958321686 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2144494592 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2151424232 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2179703797 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2180583443 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2188999507 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2335766622 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W249450448 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2575244842 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2937095156 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W297802345 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W304822705 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W3121601158 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W3123775034 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W3171743343 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W3197775359 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W3203483626 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W57326635 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W96944967 @default.
- W2247190589 hasRelatedWork W2416899675 @default.
- W2247190589 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2247190589 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2247190589 magId "2247190589" @default.
- W2247190589 workType "article" @default.