FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2247642163> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2247642163 endingPage "8" @default.
• W2247642163 startingPage "64" @default.
• W2247642163 abstract "Laparoscopic L5-S1 diskectomy (LLD) is a promising new technique for managing disabling pain from herniated lumbar disks. It is unknown, however, whether the clinical results of LLD are superior to those of traditional laminectomy (LAM). This study was undertaken, therefore, in order to compare LLD and LAM in the management of L5-S1 disk herniation unresponsive to conservative treatment measures. Clinical records of 22 patients who underwent 23 LLD procedures and of 23 LAM patients were reviewed with respect to demographics and median age, operative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, and time of rehabilitation to work/normal activity, as well as postoperative morbidity, recurrent symptoms, long-term functional status, and inhospital patient charges. Two LLD patients had undergone LAM previously, and one had a percutaneous microdiskectomy. All LLD patients had relief of disk pain immediately after surgery. Morbidity after LLD included transient brachial plexus neuropraxia (1), urinary retention (1), and rectus hematoma (1). No LAM complications were reported. Among LLD patients, compared with LAM, median age (34.5 years versus 40 years), estimated blood loss (12 mL versus 68 mL), hospital length of stay (1 day versus 3 days), time to normal activity (17 days versus 79 days) and mean inhospital patient charges ($5,737 +/- 283 versus $7,762 +/- 662) were reduced significantly (P < 0.05). LLD operating time was significantly longer than LAM (210 versus 160 minutes median, P < 0.01). With a median follow-up time of 11.0 months (range, 2 to 23 months) all LLD patients had returned to normal activity, whereas 7 of the LAM group (30%) remained disabled (P < 0.01). Sixty-eight per cent of LLD patients were pain-free during follow-up, compared with 39 per cent of the LAM group (P < 0.05). Sixty-four per cent of LLD patients and 57 per cent of the LAM group needed postoperatively physical therapy. One LLD and 4 LAM patients required reoperation, by LLD and LAM, respectively, for recurrent disk herniation. LLD is a safe, cost-effective, minimally invasive operation for managing disabling L5-S1 disk herniation. Compared with LAM, LLD reduces blood loss, length of stay, rehabilitation time, and patient charges, and improves long-term functional and pain-free status. LLD should be considered as an alternative to LAM for patients with herniated L5-S1 intervertebral disks unresponsive to conservative management." @default.
• W2247642163 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2247642163 creator A5059557227 @default.
• W2247642163 creator A5060845563 @default.
• W2247642163 date "1996-01-01" @default.
• W2247642163 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2247642163 title "Laparoscopic L5-S1 diskectomy: a cost-effective, minimally invasive general surgery--neurosurgery team alternative to laminectomy." @default.
• W2247642163 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8540649" @default.
• W2247642163 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2247642163 type Work @default.
• W2247642163 sameAs 2247642163 @default.
• W2247642163 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2247642163 countsByYear W22476421632019 @default.
• W2247642163 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2247642163 hasAuthorship W2247642163A5059557227 @default.
• W2247642163 hasAuthorship W2247642163A5060845563 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C12770488 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C2779835254 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C2780091945 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C2909668398 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C118552586 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C12770488 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C141071460 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C2779835254 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C2780091945 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C2780775167 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C2909668398 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C42219234 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C44575665 @default.
• W2247642163 hasConceptScore W2247642163C71924100 @default.
• W2247642163 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2247642163 hasLocation W22476421631 @default.
• W2247642163 hasOpenAccess W2247642163 @default.
• W2247642163 hasPrimaryLocation W22476421631 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W129566900 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W1993650020 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2017344562 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2022179099 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2081191483 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2090602510 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2275160930 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2325367333 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2367646856 @default.
• W2247642163 hasRelatedWork W2747092013 @default.
• W2247642163 hasVolume "62" @default.
• W2247642163 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2247642163 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2247642163 magId "2247642163" @default.
• W2247642163 workType "article" @default.