FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2260268719> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2260268719 abstract "We argue that it is possible to follow the dynamics of a scientific field as it emerges. Being able to do such allows for example, industrial actors to position themselves regarding their competences and public policy makers to support the development of the field. For that matter, we follow traces of its emergence through publications analysis (Bonaccorsi and Thoma, 2005; Bozeman et al., 2007; Mangematin et al, 2008). Data included in large databases and extracted from the WoS brings us the possibility to characterise a scientific field. The use of traditional methods such as journal or cojournals analysis show the main journals of a field and the relationships between them (Hirsch, 2005, van Raan, 2003). The dynamics of journals and the co-citation indicator can illustrate the structuration of a field (Leydesdorff and Rafols, 2009; Park and Leydesdorff, forthcoming, Leydesdorff and Schank, 2008, Leydesdorff, 2007 ). Co-authors analysis (Callon et al, 1986; White and McCain, 1998) points to the networks of relationships between authors. It has been used to illustrate the internal structure of a field and its central and most powerful actors. Last, co-word analysis used on title and/or abstract points to the science itself showing how elements of a knowledge bases are articulated (van den Besselaar and Heimeriks, 2006). However, we consider that all these traditional methods used to illustrate the organisation of a scientific field can only be used as it is already structured. Indeed, journal analysis is not possible for an emerging field as it does not yet have reference journals (see also Zitt and Bassecoulard, 2006). Co-authors analysis cannot be used either as a community of scientists with star scientists (Darby and Zucker, 2006) does not yet exist. Last, co-word analysis cannot be used as the field is not defined yet which makes it impossible to choose which words should be selected and which should not. Following Bonaccorsi (2007), we argue that a keywords analysis can illustrate the dynamics of an emerging field. Bonaccorsi showed that an emerging field has a high rate of new keyword introduction. The technological plateform CorTexT (IFRIS1) developed a tool named Kwords Lab to explore the keywords of an emerging field. On the contrary to past studies on top of keywords from the abstract or the title, we also take into consideration keywords provided by individual authors as well as journal keywords. If this choice enriches our analysis it also brings heterogeneity which need to be dealt with. To test this tool, we based our analysis on the emergence of nanosciences: indeed Kahane and Mogoutov (2007) have already defined the field. Defining the outlines of an emerging field is the first difficulty. As their query brings between 1998 and 2006 543 297 publications, we include automatically in our database all keywords (title, author and journal). This brings us with a total of 8 618 664 keywords before treatments. This large amount of data constitutes the second limit of the work. How to deal with several hundred of thousands of words when traditional textual software cannot do so (we tested Calliope2, Alceste3 and ReseauLu4)? It is to exceed these limits that we have developed an automatic tool which allows to classify keywords based on their significance in" @default.
• W2260268719 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2260268719 creator A5002888340 @default.
• W2260268719 creator A5009162059 @default.
• W2260268719 creator A5042315952 @default.
• W2260268719 creator A5055195063 @default.
• W2260268719 creator A5058544883 @default.
• W2260268719 creator A5077034276 @default.
• W2260268719 date "2010-05-05" @default.
• W2260268719 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2260268719 title "Exploiting keywords life-cycle to analyse the dynamics of an emerging field : An experiment in Nanosciences with the Kwords lab" @default.
• W2260268719 cites W1647671624 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W1968283201 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W1976208596 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2054602743 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2072897447 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2079090652 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2127564704 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2128438887 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2129513604 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2147854962 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W2890516329 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W3014920224 @default.
• W2260268719 cites W338220291 @default.
• W2260268719 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2260268719 type Work @default.
• W2260268719 sameAs 2260268719 @default.
• W2260268719 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2260268719 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2260268719 hasAuthorship W2260268719A5002888340 @default.
• W2260268719 hasAuthorship W2260268719A5009162059 @default.
• W2260268719 hasAuthorship W2260268719A5042315952 @default.
• W2260268719 hasAuthorship W2260268719A5055195063 @default.
• W2260268719 hasAuthorship W2260268719A5058544883 @default.
• W2260268719 hasAuthorship W2260268719A5077034276 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConcept C145912823 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConceptScore W2260268719C145912823 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConceptScore W2260268719C15744967 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConceptScore W2260268719C19417346 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConceptScore W2260268719C202444582 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConceptScore W2260268719C33923547 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConceptScore W2260268719C41008148 @default.
• W2260268719 hasConceptScore W2260268719C9652623 @default.
• W2260268719 hasLocation W22602687191 @default.
• W2260268719 hasOpenAccess W2260268719 @default.
• W2260268719 hasPrimaryLocation W22602687191 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W1596801655 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2130043461 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2260268719 hasRelatedWork W2530322880 @default.
• W2260268719 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2260268719 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2260268719 magId "2260268719" @default.
• W2260268719 workType "article" @default.