Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2260757004> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W2260757004 abstract "This paper presents the story of v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79 (1992), the most recent decision in this volume, and, in part for that reason, the decision that is most frequently discussed in the tax world. A case such as Knetch v. United States exerts its influence subtly, in forming the basis for today's economic substance doctrine. Lawyers can (and do) debate the merits of that doctrine, and in so doing comment upon the Knetch decision, but the decision itself has faded into the background. INDOPCO, by contrast, is still very much alive. Industry has lined up an (anti) INDOPCO Coalition, headed by the (former) IRS Commissioner who pursued the case; the government has recently issued regulations; the decision (and its aftermath) is discussed in today's tax and business journals. The case is important, then, for its practical significance. It is the most recent Supreme Court announcement on the deductibility of business expenses that do not produce or enhance tangible assets. In time, of course, will lie under, and help give shape to, newer cases and regulations. The case will be worth studying less for its practical import than the light it sheds on the administration of an income tax, or, more speculatively, any tax or set of rules shaped by the political process. The judge, legislator, or administrator must balance competing goals: uniformity, certainty, practicality and so on. In INDOPCO, that balancing act failed: the opinion in the case is widely seen as making a bad situation worse. What makes this failure particularly sobering is that the case fell into seemingly able hands. The opinion was written by the most knowledgeable tax jurist ever to sit on the Court and solicited by an administration whose leadership opposed everything the opinion came to stand for. The paper will be published as a chapter in a book to be entitled Tax Stories: An In-Depth Look at Ten Leading Federal Income Tax Cases (Foundation Press, forthcoming 2002). Additional financial support for the project has been provided by the American Tax Policy Institute." @default.
- W2260757004 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2260757004 creator A5017371904 @default.
- W2260757004 date "2002-08-16" @default.
- W2260757004 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2260757004 title "The Story of Indopco: What Went Wrong in the Capitalization V. Deduction Debate?" @default.
- W2260757004 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
- W2260757004 type Work @default.
- W2260757004 sameAs 2260757004 @default.
- W2260757004 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2260757004 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2260757004 hasAuthorship W2260757004A5017371904 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C165786947 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C172008318 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C2779137862 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C2781287902 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C551662922 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C74939039 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C77269340 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C138885662 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C144133560 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C162324750 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C165786947 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C172008318 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C17744445 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C190253527 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C199539241 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C2776211767 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C2777351106 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C2778137410 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C2778272461 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C2779137862 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C2781287902 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C41895202 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C551662922 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C74939039 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C77269340 @default.
- W2260757004 hasConceptScore W2260757004C94625758 @default.
- W2260757004 hasOpenAccess W2260757004 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W1491818120 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W1827163892 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W1976984344 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W1983270912 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W2112420637 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W2200800353 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W2810163196 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W2889691389 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W3122106388 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W3122867200 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W3124653999 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W3193562365 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W3210612666 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W348270210 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W51711562 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W626682949 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W805021461 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W814299049 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W2183001845 @default.
- W2260757004 hasRelatedWork W2612676805 @default.
- W2260757004 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2260757004 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2260757004 magId "2260757004" @default.
- W2260757004 workType "article" @default.