FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2260774792> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2260774792 abstract "The provision of additional information is often assumed to improve consumption decisions, allowing consumers to more accurately weigh the costs and benefits of alternatives. However, increasing the complexity of decision problems may prompt changes in information processing. This is particularly relevant for experimental methods such as discrete choice experiments (DCEs) where the researcher can manipulate the complexity of the decision problem. The primary aims of this study are (i) to test whether consumers actually process additional information in an already complex decision problem, and (ii) consider the implications of any such ‘complexity-driven’ changes in information processing for design and analysis of DCEs. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) is used to simulate a complex decision problem; here, the choice between complementary and conventional medicine for different health conditions. Eye-tracking technology is used to capture the number of times and the duration that a participant looks at any part of a computer screen during completion of DCE choice sets. From this we can analyse what has become known in the DCE literature as ‘attribute non-attendance’ (ANA). Using data from 32 participants, we model the likelihood of ANA as a function of choice set complexity and respondent characteristics using fixed and random effects models to account for repeated choice set completion. We also model whether participants are consistent with regard to which characteristics (attributes) they consider across choice sets. We find that complexity is the strongest predictor of ANA when other possible influences, such as time pressure, ordering effects, survey specific effects and socio-demographic variables (including proxies for prior experience with the decision problem) are considered. We also find that most participants do not apply a consistent information processing strategy across choice sets. Eye-tracking technology shows promise as a way of obtaining additional information from consumer research, improving DCE design, and informing the design of policy measures. With regards to DCE design, results from the present study suggest that eye-tracking data can identify the point at which adding complexity (and realism) to DCE choice scenarios becomes self-defeating due to unacceptable increases in ANA. Eye-tracking data therefore has clear application in the construction of guidelines for DCE design and during piloting of DCE choice scenarios. With regards to design of policy measures such as labelling requirements for CAM and conventional medicines, the provision of additional information has the potential to make difficult decisions even harder and may not have the desired effect on decision-making." @default.
• W2260774792 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2260774792 creator A5033837815 @default.
• W2260774792 creator A5060470387 @default.
• W2260774792 date "2015-12-01" @default.
• W2260774792 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2260774792 title "Lost in the crowd? Using eye-tracking to investigate the effect of complexity on attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments" @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1513024110 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1562592376 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1583399002 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W158727920 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1870477199 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1968486838 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1980682042 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1983489645 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W1984576869 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2001143532 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2008703630 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2015901745 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2017729498 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2021618608 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2030604822 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2040909578 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2045878613 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2060493953 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2066068426 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2066766347 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2070569374 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2078713726 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2081449440 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2108017860 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2121722424 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2122707212 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2130193386 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2143885952 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2145677931 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2148962857 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2158265971 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2159936838 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W2309067248 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W4292157289 @default.
• W2260774792 cites W579018955 @default.
• W2260774792 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0251-1" @default.
• W2260774792 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4739384" @default.
• W2260774792 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26842646" @default.
• W2260774792 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2260774792 type Work @default.
• W2260774792 sameAs 2260774792 @default.
• W2260774792 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W2260774792 countsByYear W22607747922017 @default.
• W2260774792 countsByYear W22607747922018 @default.
• W2260774792 countsByYear W22607747922019 @default.
• W2260774792 countsByYear W22607747922020 @default.
• W2260774792 countsByYear W22607747922021 @default.
• W2260774792 countsByYear W22607747922022 @default.
• W2260774792 countsByYear W22607747922023 @default.
• W2260774792 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2260774792 hasAuthorship W2260774792A5033837815 @default.
• W2260774792 hasAuthorship W2260774792A5060470387 @default.
• W2260774792 hasBestOaLocation W22607747921 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C14036430 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C163839840 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C190669063 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C2778173179 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C111919701 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C119857082 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C14036430 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C149782125 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C154945302 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C162324750 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C163839840 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C177264268 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C17744445 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C190669063 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C199360897 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C199539241 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C2776640315 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C2778173179 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C33923547 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C41008148 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C50522688 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C78458016 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C86803240 @default.
• W2260774792 hasConceptScore W2260774792C98045186 @default.

• next