FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2265843353> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2265843353 abstract "Previous research into Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education has focussed mainly on the curriculum, pedagogy and the gap between education, and little is known about the cognitive profile of the HCI practitioner or educator, or how their individual differences impact upon practice in the field or the classroom. This research intends to address this gap by investigating the cognitive style of HCI practitioners, educators, and those with both roles.315 professionals responded to a global online survey which captured their individual cognitive style using the Allinson and Hayes Cognitive Style Index (CSI) which tests whether the subject tends more towards an intuitivist or analyst, and the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire (OSIVQ) which suggests a three dimensional model of cognitive style – object imagers who prefer to construct pictorial images, spatial imagers who prefer schematic representations and verbalizers who prefer to use verbal-analytical tools. Together, these two instruments provide a profile that matches the skills required to work within the field of HCI. The respondents included practitioners in the field (N=179), educators (N=61), and some who were both practitioner and educator (N=75). A one-way between-groups ANOVA and MANOVA was performed to investigate differences in the role of the professional, and the CSI and OSIVQ profiles respectively, followed by the Welch t-test to compare their OSIVQ scores with the published normative values.The ANOVA comparing the CSI scores for each of the groups revealed a statistically significant difference of F(2, 312) = 3.35, p= 0.38 and post-hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for the educators was significantly different from that of the ‘both’ group. The practitioners did not differ significantly from either the educators or ‘both’. This may in some part be explained by the fact that very often HCI is taught by an academic with a computer science background rather than an HCI specialist, but further investigation is needed in this area. The MANOVA used the three constructs of the OSIVQ as dependent variables. No significant difference was found between the groups. However, the t-tests comparing the professional against the normative data revealed that whilst there was no significant difference between the object imager score of the HCI professional and the scientist, there was a difference between the spatial imager score of the HCI professional and the visual artist, perhaps again reflecting the computer science background of many professionals.24 survey respondents have been interviewed and the resulting data will form the basis of a thematic analysis to extend the cognitive profile, and to identify the predominant technological frames of operation. Applying this concept of technological frames to the domain of HCI, will help to make sense of the adoption and application of knowledge, tools and techniques amongst this community. In order for the curriculum to meet the needs of the market, the educator needs to understand the practitioner in order to produce graduates equipped for the role. Finally, as HCI is delivered in a multidisciplinary environment, should it not also be taught by a multidisciplinary team?" @default.
• W2265843353 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2265843353 creator A5023575989 @default.
• W2265843353 creator A5076918526 @default.
• W2265843353 date "2015-05-16" @default.
• W2265843353 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2265843353 title "Comparing the cognitive profile of the HCI professional and the HCI educator" @default.
• W2265843353 cites W2023345440 @default.
• W2265843353 cites W2094603337 @default.
• W2265843353 cites W2095084415 @default.
• W2265843353 cites W2097236369 @default.
• W2265843353 cites W2150238850 @default.
• W2265843353 cites W2158509606 @default.
• W2265843353 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2265843353 type Work @default.
• W2265843353 sameAs 2265843353 @default.
• W2265843353 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2265843353 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2265843353 hasAuthorship W2265843353A5023575989 @default.
• W2265843353 hasAuthorship W2265843353A5076918526 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C150681269 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C192424360 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C2781238097 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C111472728 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C119857082 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C138885662 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C145420912 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C150681269 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C151730666 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C154945302 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C15744967 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C166957645 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C169760540 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C169900460 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C192424360 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C19417346 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C2776445246 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C2777267654 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C2781238097 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C41008148 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C44725695 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C47177190 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C75630572 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C77805123 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C86803240 @default.
• W2265843353 hasConceptScore W2265843353C95457728 @default.
• W2265843353 hasLocation W22658433531 @default.
• W2265843353 hasOpenAccess W2265843353 @default.
• W2265843353 hasPrimaryLocation W22658433531 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W1607851312 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W183568772 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W1856229962 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W1891263613 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2016931561 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2045354180 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2085806370 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2124731411 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2129069522 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2134417307 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2155660442 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2226195760 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W224748290 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2269620647 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2399121902 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W243038815 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2528657814 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W2975190287 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W3015953406 @default.
• W2265843353 hasRelatedWork W75240444 @default.
• W2265843353 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2265843353 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2265843353 magId "2265843353" @default.
• W2265843353 workType "article" @default.