FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2266398396> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2266398396 startingPage "733" @default.
• W2266398396 abstract "AbstractThe type of Sino-U.S. has been gaining increasing academic attention, as result of intensive interactions of the two countries' leadership. Since there is no precedent for the new-type great power traditional (mainstream) paradigms in international are much less powerful in explaining this emerging phenomenon. By contrast, the theory of complex constructivism, based on binary complementarity and emphasizing dynamic process, provides useful perspective. Drawing insights from complex constructivist ideas, this paper attempts to identify the key social conditions that facilitate the new-type Sino-U.S. relationship. It also gives advice on how this relationship can be maintained and strengthened.Keywords: Sino-U.S. complex constructivism, binary complementarityJEL Classification: F51, F53, F55, F59(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)1. IntroductionDespite concurrent government turnovers in both countries in 2012, political leaders in China and U.S. retain the important consensus on stable, cooperative Sino-US relationship, reached by their predecessors. Their extensive interactions and speeches have expressed strong desire to forge new type of great power relations between China and the United States. While for China this unprecedented and inspiring relationship calls for promoting equality, mutual trust, inclusiveness, mutual learning and mutually beneficial (Hu, 2012), for U.S. it entails a stable and mutually acceptable balance between cooperation and competition (Clinton, 2012). The top leadership of the two countries is reaching consensus on the Sino-U.S. political architecture - to avoid the seemingly predestined tragedy of great power politics and to find feasible way of cooperative co-existence between declining and rising powers. This consensus crystallizes into the notion of new type of great power relations, which not only defines the long-term prospect of Sino-U.S. relationship, but also has strategic significance for maintaining global order and constructing harmonious world against backdrop of the international structural transformations.That said, an important question remains unanswered. To what extent is the type of great power effective and realizable rather than rhetorical and hypothetical? The unraveling of this question requires close investigations of the properties and nature of new-type great power relations. It also demands theoretical and empirical evidence that convincingly supports this model. Since the notion of new-type great power is historically unprecedented, traditional (mainstream) paradigms of international theory provide only limited clues for the nascent subject. Meanwhile, based on ideas of binary complementarity1and evolutionary process, complex constructivism (Dong, 2012) may supply useful perspective on how this model forms. This paper begins with brief review of how traditional theoretical frameworks interpret Sino-U.S. relationship and why they fail to understand its changing nature. It then draws insights from complex constructivism and analyses the key social conditions under which the new-type Sino-U.S. relationship develops. The last part discusses the strategic implications for strengthening the cooperative process between China and the United States.2.What Do Traditional Paradigms Say about the NewType Sino-U.S. Relationship?One of the core issues in the study of international focuses on the power transitions between declining and rising powers and their political consequences. Pessimistic rationalists believe that the rise of state power is often accompanied by the broadening of national interests and aggressive foreign policies. In this scenario resource competitions between status-quo and revisionist states escalate and worries about survival among the former intensify. …" @default.
• W2266398396 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2266398396 creator A5018782417 @default.
• W2266398396 date "2014-12-01" @default.
• W2266398396 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2266398396 title "The New Type of Great Power Relations between China and U.S.: A Complex Constructivist Perspective" @default.
• W2266398396 cites W1489242940 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W2017718661 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W2021652768 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W2050700891 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W2050894165 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W2170125543 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W2501515975 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W2505857556 @default.
• W2266398396 cites W95704776 @default.
• W2266398396 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2266398396 type Work @default.
• W2266398396 sameAs 2266398396 @default.
• W2266398396 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2266398396 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2266398396 hasAuthorship W2266398396A5018782417 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C133281099 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C34355311 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C111472728 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C118084267 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C133281099 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C138885662 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C138921699 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C144024400 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C162324750 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C17744445 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C190253527 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C191935318 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C199539241 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C2777617010 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C34355311 @default.
• W2266398396 hasConceptScore W2266398396C94625758 @default.
• W2266398396 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2266398396 hasLocation W22663983961 @default.
• W2266398396 hasOpenAccess W2266398396 @default.
• W2266398396 hasPrimaryLocation W22663983961 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W1777508596 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W1991515435 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W1999845488 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2032993797 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2108979075 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2185574739 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2281808957 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2561429927 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2570828231 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2582137180 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2741930615 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2778734153 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2794880344 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2904534180 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2908507474 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W307434479 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W3145721388 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W583060523 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W2508372805 @default.
• W2266398396 hasRelatedWork W3123641838 @default.
• W2266398396 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2266398396 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2266398396 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2266398396 magId "2266398396" @default.
• W2266398396 workType "article" @default.