FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2268271741> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2268271741 abstract "An Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to Nova Southeastern University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The Interactions Among Information Technology Organizational Learning, Project Learning, and Project Success By Donald S. McKay II June 2012 Knowledge gained from completed information technology (IT) projects was not often shared with emerging project teams. Learning lessons from other project teams was not pursued because people lack time, do not see value in learning, fear a potentially painful process, and had concerns that sharing knowledge will hurt their career. Leaders could change the situation; however organizational leaders have not seen value in project learning and have not made it a priority. Yet, if a relationship existed among IT project success variables (PSVs) organizational learning factors (OLFs) and project learning practices (PLPs) then IT leaders may take greater interest in managing knowledge. The goal of this research was to conduct a correlational study to determine the relationship among OLFs, PLPs, and PSVs within IT organizations. OLFs included those activities at the corporate level that enabled project teams to learn from other projects. PLPs included the activities to learn lessons from a maturing or completed project. PLPs also included activities within an emerging project to harness lessons from prior projects. PSVs described project success. The research question (RQ) asked; what was the relationship among the OLFs, PLPs, and PSVs? To answer the research question it was necessary to ask four support questions (SQ). First, what elements defined organizational learning, project learning, and project success? Second, how effective was use of organizational learning? Third, how effective was project learning? Fourth, how successful were IT projects? To answer the first SQ a content analysis was conducted followed by a review with a Delphi team. A survey was then developed based on the content analysis. Finally, a statistical analysis was conducted to answer the remaining SQs and the RQ. The content analysis and Delphi team review revealed 12 OLFs, 11 PLPs, and 9 PSVs. Answering the second and third support questions the study found that OLFs and PLPs could be used more effectively within IT organizations. However, IT leaders reported that a foundation for organizational and project learning existed. Answering the fourth SQ, IT leaders reported good project success though risk management could be improved. This study found that there was a positive and significant relationship among the OLFs, PLPs, and PSVs. The relationship among the OLFs, PLPs, and PSVs suggests that there is justification to research and develop IT competence in learning. Acknowledgements Several people are to thank for their support and contributions to this dissertation. Dr. Ellis, my advisor, provided invaluable guidance throughout this effort which began when I took his course in knowledge management. Dr. Ellis worked with me on all of my questions, helped me through the rough spots, and reviewed my papers in a timely manner all of which was greatly appreciated. I am also grateful for the thorough and insightful comments provided by Dr. Cohen and Dr. Hafner who served on the dissertation committee. My mother-in-law, Tamara Tolstikova, and aunt, Galina Tolstikova, helped make this dissertation a success at a critical time when they helped prepare the survey invitations. I am very thankful for their contribution. Thanks also to my stepson Artem Bai who proof read the idea paper and was supportive throughout this effort. I appreciate support from my daughters, Lauren and Annelise, who always believed that I would complete this degree. Also, my parents, Ellen and Ernest, instilled in me the importance and value of education for which I am most thankful. Solon Webb and Jack Opet two long-time colleagues and friends encouraged me throughout this endeavor. Solon and Jack followed my progress and discussed ideas with me. Their support is appreciated. Stacy Goff, president of the American Society for the Advancement of Project Management (ASAPM) and a chapter of the International Project Management Association kindly published the survey the ASAPM site. He also reviewed the survey and encouraged members to respond. Stacy’s support was invaluable. Finally, I wish to thank my wife, Irina, to whom this dissertation is dedicated. My wife encouraged me even as she was pursuing her own doctoral degree. She proof read my idea paper and led the family team that made the survey a success. She listened to my ideas and helped me crystallize thoughts over the past few years. Irina’s support allowed me to complete this endeavor. Table of" @default.
• W2268271741 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2268271741 creator A5069833959 @default.
• W2268271741 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2268271741 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2268271741 title "The Interactions among Information Technology Organizational Learning, Project Learning, and Project Success." @default.
• W2268271741 cites W104771873 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1485859371 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1518642694 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1523895391 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1539265701 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1548364886 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1600443746 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1964856554 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1975284306 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1979362375 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1981656477 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1984107856 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1986617074 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1991757747 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1993508150 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1997842112 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1998824097 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2000435938 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2001072902 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2001648093 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2005439370 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2009979423 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2010448344 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2012409882 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2021127917 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2024050635 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2029948534 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2030415096 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2038605853 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2039508218 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2043613013 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2046078048 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2047347850 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2053726320 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2057980518 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2061367713 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2063065565 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2065738499 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2066213431 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2082282962 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2091118278 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2097549324 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2111628838 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2112592336 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2125787028 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2126006457 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2135389509 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2136076768 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2137269005 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2146061969 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2147332245 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2148858459 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2157116138 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2160904960 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2188883905 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2484009449 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2583504027 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2811479562 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2916280901 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2991239942 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W3000993043 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W3125165849 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W3159412470 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W3185406853 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W4063732 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W1550646741 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2211749340 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2507237992 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W2592381218 @default.
• W2268271741 cites W3141590534 @default.
• W2268271741 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2268271741 type Work @default.
• W2268271741 sameAs 2268271741 @default.
• W2268271741 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2268271741 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2268271741 hasAuthorship W2268271741A5069833959 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C15952604 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C169735623 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C2776604539 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConceptScore W2268271741C119857082 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConceptScore W2268271741C15744967 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConceptScore W2268271741C15952604 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConceptScore W2268271741C162324750 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConceptScore W2268271741C169735623 @default.
• W2268271741 hasConceptScore W2268271741C17744445 @default.

• next