FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2269313815> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2269313815 abstract "Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE ABSTRACT Prastiwi, Chyntia Heru Woro. 2012. The Quality of English Textbook English for Senior High School Students XI . Thesis. Graduate Program Of English Language Teaching of State University of Malang. Advisors: (1) Prof. H. Ali Saukah, M.A., Ph.D., (2) Dr. Sri Rachmajanti, Dip.TESL., M.Pd. Key words: english, textbook, evaluation, senior high school The goal of the study is to review how the Interlanguage: English for Senior High School Students XI meets the criteria of a good communicative textbook based on 8 main categories, i.e. relevancy to the 2006 Standards of Content, language content and skills, communicative aspects, authenticity, quality of practice materials, sequence-recycle-staging, technicalities, and suitability to students' interest and needs. The researcher utilized descriptive-evaluative or content/document analysis as the design of the study. Analysis sheet and students'questionnaires were the main instruments used. The analysis sheet was extracted from criteria mentioned on the reference sheet extracted from Board of Standards of National Education (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan/BSNP) and suggested by Ur (1999), Cunningsworth (1995), Nunan (2003), Reiss (2005), and Harmer (2007). The analysis sheet was used to judge the textbook quality. It was filled by 3 evaluators, i.e. the researcher as the main evaluator and two teachers of private Madrasah Aliyah (Islamic Senior High School) as peer evaluators. The questionnaire was used to see the students' responses toward the materials and tasks. The fulfillment of the criteria was taken from Sukriawati (2008) and Fathurrahman (2004) which was qualified in very good (85%-100%), good (65%-84%), fair (55%-64%), poor (40%-54%) and very poor (0%-39%). The results of evaluation show that the relevancy to the 2006 Standards of Content is categorized as good, language content and skills are very good, communicative aspects are good, authenticity is very poor, quality of practice materials is very good, sequence-recycle-staging is fair, technicalities is fair, and suitability is good as it accommodates the students' interest and needs. Interlanguage textbook is not a good communicative textbook and unrecommended for users who rely on using one book. It neglected the primary and indispensable criterion, i.e. relevancy to the curriculum and does not fulfill all criteria being evaluated. Some suggestions are proposed. First goes to the teachers who rely on using one book, they should omit it. Meanwhile, to teachers who still want to use it as an alternative textbook; they should change it by adding, rewriting, re-ordering, or reducing the materials and tasks. The second goes to the book writers; they should complete the materials, provide listening CD/cassette, interesting activities, authentic dialogue and texts, and promote creative activities.Next goes to the BSNP and government; they should make the evaluation criteria in detail, show transparent result of evaluation, and do revision toward the textbook. Last, for further researchers who concern with a textbook evaluation, they can use the result of this research as one of references. ABSTRAK Prastiwi, Chyntia Heru Woro. 2012. Kualitas Buku Teks English for Senior High School Students XI . Tesis. Program Pascasarjana Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Negeri Malang. Pembimbing: (1) Prof. H. Ali Saukah, M.A., Ph.D., (2) Dr. Sri Rachmajanti, Dip.TESL., M.Pd. Kata kunci: bahasa inggris, buku teks, evaluasi, SMU Penelitian ini brtujuan untuk mereview bagaimana buku teks English for Senior High School Students XI memenuhi kriteria sebuah buku teks komunikatif yang baik. Tujuan ini dipecah menjadi 8 kategori: relevansi terhadap Standar Isi 2006, konten bahasa dan skill, aspek komunikatif, authentisitas, kualitas materi praktis, urutan-pengulangan-distribusi materi, teknikalitas, dan kesesuaiannya terhadap ketertarikan dan kebutuhan siswa. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan deskriptif evaluatif atau analisis isi. Lembar analisa dan kuisioner siswa merupakan instrumen utama yang digunakan. Lembar analisa mengacu pada kriteria pedoman yang diambil dari kriteria BSNP (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan) yang dilengkapi dengan kriteria yang bersumber dari Ur (1999), Cunningsworth (1995), Nunan (2003), Reiss (2005), dan Harmer (2007). Lembar analisa digunakan untuk menilai kualitas buku. Lembar analisa ini diisi oleh 3 evaluator, yaitu peneliti sebagai evaluator utama dan 2 guru dari Madrasah Aliyah swasta yang berfungsi sebagai evaluator sejawat. Kuisioner digunakan untuk mengetahui pendapat siswa terhadap buku teks. Pemenuhan kriteria diambil dari Sukriawati (2008), dan Fathurrahman (2004), yang digolongkan menjadi sangat baik (85%-100%), baik (65%-84%), cukup (55%-64%), buruk (40%-54%) dan sangat buruk (0%-39%). Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa relefansi terhadap Standar Isi 2006 adalah baik, isi bahasa dan skill sangat baik, aspek komunikatif baik, authentisitas sangat kurang, kualitas materi praktis sangat baik, urutan-pengulangan-distribusi materi-di cukup, teknikalitas cukup, dan kesesuaian terhadap siswa dikategorikan baik karena mengakomodasi ketertarikan dan kebutuhan siswa. Buku Interlanguage bukan buku yang baik dan tidak direkomendasikan kepada pengguna yang hanya menggunakan satu buku, karena buku ini mengabaikan kriteria utama yang sangat penting yaitu relefansi terhadap kurikulum dan buku ini tidak memenuhi semua kriteria yang dievalusi.  Ada beberapa saran yang diajukan. Pertama, kepada guru yang mengacu hanya pada satu buku, mereka sebaiknya mengabaikan buku ini. Sedangkan kepada guru yang masih ingin tetap menggunakan buku ini sebagai alternatif, mereka sebaiknya melakukan perubahan dengan cara menambah, menulis kembali, menyusun ulang, atau mengurangi materi dan tugas. Kedua, kepada penulis buku hendaknya melengkapi materi yang kurang, menyediakan CD/kaset listening, kegiatan yang menarik, dialog dan teks yang otentik, dan menambah aktifitas yang kreatif. Selanjutnya kepada BSNP dan pemerintah, hendaknya menyusun kriteria penilaian yang lebih rinci serta lebih transparan dalam menyajikan hasil penilaiannya.Terakhir kepada peneliti yang fokus pada evaluasi buku, mereka dapat menggunakan hasil penelitian ini sebagai salah satu rujukan. /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:Table Normal;mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:;mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;mso-para-margin-top:0cm;mso-para-margin-right:0cm;mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;mso-para-margin-left:0cm;line-height:115%;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Times New Roman;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:Times New Roman;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}" @default.
• W2269313815 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2269313815 creator A5002053468 @default.
• W2269313815 date "2012-10-17" @default.
• W2269313815 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2269313815 title "The Quality of English Textbook Interlanguage: English for Senior High School Students XI. (Thesis)" @default.
• W2269313815 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2269313815 type Work @default.
• W2269313815 sameAs 2269313815 @default.
• W2269313815 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2269313815 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2269313815 hasAuthorship W2269313815A5002053468 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C162446236 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C207489910 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C2987496018 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C4445939 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C111472728 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C138885662 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C144024400 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C145420912 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C15744967 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C162446236 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C19417346 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C207489910 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C27206212 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C2779530757 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C2987496018 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C36289849 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C41895202 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C4445939 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C509550671 @default.
• W2269313815 hasConceptScore W2269313815C71924100 @default.
• W2269313815 hasLocation W22693138151 @default.
• W2269313815 hasOpenAccess W2269313815 @default.
• W2269313815 hasPrimaryLocation W22693138151 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W1514673239 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W1864668033 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2194776192 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2278782763 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2291960912 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2326558379 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2548762280 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2569291907 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2572313330 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2591995908 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2609333870 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2730397744 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2899770608 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2948540450 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2948862023 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2982145750 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W3030175232 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W3198564405 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W947806922 @default.
• W2269313815 hasRelatedWork W2613293282 @default.
• W2269313815 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2269313815 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2269313815 magId "2269313815" @default.
• W2269313815 workType "article" @default.