Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2270060676> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2270060676 abstract "There appears to be some consensus that there are three identifiable jurisprudential periods in American law. These are: the first formative period extending from the ratification of the Constitution to about the Civil War; a second formalist period extending from about the Civil War to between the World Wars, and a third modern period from the demise of the formalist era. Whether we may now be in the post-modern era is well beyond the scope of the present inquiry, which is limited to patent law and a single albeit important issue within patent law. The working hypothesis is that patent law would generally follow the same jurisprudential patterns in the same general time frames as other areas of law. Indeed, this assumption would seem justified by the use of broad, general language in patent statutes over the entire period in question and hence by leaving it to the courts to interpret and elaborate upon undefined terms of art. One might, however, be somewhat suspicious that formalism might play a significantly greater role in patent law because of its technical nature technological and legal. To test this and the base hypothesis of the correspondence of patent law to general American law in its evolution through the identified jurisprudential periods, one particular issue in patent law has been selected. The issue is: What constitutes patentable subject matter - the patent eligibility issue. That is, what may be patented irrespective of the subject matter's substantive merit in terms of novelty, utility, nonobviousness, or value to society. From analyzing the principal cases dealing with patentable subject matter in the respective periods, the working hypothesis that patent law would follow general law appears to be sustainable, however, with the caveat that a strong strain of formalism was not detected even during the formalist era. Rather, there appears to be a regenerative, self-correcting mechanism at work over time with respect to decisions restricting the scope of patent eligibility. These regenerations appear to represent repeated reversions to the policy-driven, decision-making process of the formative period." @default.
- W2270060676 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2270060676 creator A5052621202 @default.
- W2270060676 date "2006-05-03" @default.
- W2270060676 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2270060676 title "Regeneration in American Patent Law: Statutory Subject Matter" @default.
- W2270060676 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2270060676 type Work @default.
- W2270060676 sameAs 2270060676 @default.
- W2270060676 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2270060676 countsByYear W22700606762012 @default.
- W2270060676 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2270060676 hasAuthorship W2270060676A5052621202 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C115910719 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C2777720223 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C2779218306 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C2780461701 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C2780697943 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C2984145337 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C115910719 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C144024400 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C158129432 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C170706310 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C17744445 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C190253527 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C199539241 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C2776154427 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C2777720223 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C2779218306 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C2780461701 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C2780697943 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C2984145337 @default.
- W2270060676 hasConceptScore W2270060676C34974158 @default.
- W2270060676 hasLocation W22700606761 @default.
- W2270060676 hasOpenAccess W2270060676 @default.
- W2270060676 hasPrimaryLocation W22700606761 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W1491261200 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W1510740364 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W1517535247 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W1518167947 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W1588000316 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W1589444160 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W199096846 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W2272224727 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W2288588179 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W246484958 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W2527964937 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W2563350167 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W279842571 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W3121686096 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W3121984755 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W3123624758 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W3145297079 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W3147364037 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W45577744 @default.
- W2270060676 hasRelatedWork W627013884 @default.
- W2270060676 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2270060676 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2270060676 magId "2270060676" @default.
- W2270060676 workType "article" @default.