FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2270479970> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2270479970 endingPage "75" @default.
• W2270479970 startingPage "75" @default.
• W2270479970 abstract "A departmental chair is often asked what might be needed to improve the unit and to move it to the next level. The question can be applied to everything from recruiting faculty members to graduate training to renovations. The question seems to be direct and appropriate because it implies “getting better.” But along the way to getting better are tactical questions about how to get there, criteria for assessing change, and deeper strategic questions about where “there” is. Universities have institutional needs and values, and since World War II, especially in the United States, leading research universities have evolved a shared sense of what these are (Abram et al. 1970, Guston and Keniston 1994, Kerr 1995, Cozzens 1996, Duderstadt 1999, Rosenzweig 1999, Savage 1999). But faculty members, university administrators, and the public may honestly disagree about how much an institution’s interests supersede individual and departmental interests. Is the university a public service provider, an economic engine, or a haven for intellectuals trusted to justify society’s investment? A faculty member who asks “What shall I do today?” does not mean “What do you want me to do today?” in the sense that a department chair would literally make daily assignments, but “What do I want to do?” Faculty members face an increasing number of daily choices that make the answer less obvious. Sharpening individual skills, advancing a discipline’s scholarship, working with students, administering the department, developing university programs, enhancing economic development, and engaging in public outreach all compete for attention. But what values determine a faculty member’s answer? How are these values developed, and how are they passed on to the next generation of scholars? Faculty members and their departments are frequently the friction point for conflict between individual goals and institutional goals. Tensions between and among individual, departmental, university, public, and national interests are common at the unit level.As leader of the department’s faculty but" @default.
• W2270479970 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2270479970 creator A5024966207 @default.
• W2270479970 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W2270479970 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2270479970 title "May You Live in Interesting Times: Using Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Programs to Cope with Change in the Life Sciences" @default.
• W2270479970 cites W2021090429 @default.
• W2270479970 cites W2043951987 @default.
• W2270479970 cites W2056510707 @default.
• W2270479970 doi "https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0075:myliit]2.0.co;2" @default.
• W2270479970 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2270479970 type Work @default.
• W2270479970 sameAs 2270479970 @default.
• W2270479970 citedByCount "39" @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702012 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702013 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702014 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702015 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702016 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702017 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702018 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702019 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702020 @default.
• W2270479970 countsByYear W22704799702021 @default.
• W2270479970 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2270479970 hasAuthorship W2270479970A5024966207 @default.
• W2270479970 hasBestOaLocation W22704799701 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConcept C22467394 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConceptScore W2270479970C127413603 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConceptScore W2270479970C144024400 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConceptScore W2270479970C22467394 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConceptScore W2270479970C36289849 @default.
• W2270479970 hasConceptScore W2270479970C55587333 @default.
• W2270479970 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2270479970 hasLocation W22704799701 @default.
• W2270479970 hasOpenAccess W2270479970 @default.
• W2270479970 hasPrimaryLocation W22704799701 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W2025237499 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W2145743205 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W2148528532 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W2470696986 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W2614173793 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W2745248993 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W2767814304 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W4200347578 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W4214611847 @default.
• W2270479970 hasRelatedWork W4286508873 @default.
• W2270479970 hasVolume "52" @default.
• W2270479970 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2270479970 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2270479970 magId "2270479970" @default.
• W2270479970 workType "article" @default.