FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2271030593> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2271030593 abstract "Services provided by the natural environment, especially for recreation purposes, are highly heterogeneous. It is then useful to integrate characteristics in demand analysis. Visitors who recreate in forest for instance need both natural features and material equipments. One can thus ask about the relative importance of each characteristic in visit choice. However, methods traditionally used for the valuation of recreation demand are not adapted to the study of multidimensional changes (Hanley et al., 2001). It is thus necessary to use an alternative method, namely Choice Experiment (Bennett & Blamey, 2001). Based on Lancaster multi-attribute approach (1971) and on the random utility theory (Manski, 1977; McFadden, 1974), this method allows to study visitors' preferences and to infer their Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) for each attribute. We propose here to value recreation in public forests in the Gironde area (Southwest France). The survey conducted in July-August 2006 concerned 168 residents. According to econometric treatments, their decision is not nested and the multinomial logit must be preferred. Our results show that residents would lose in utility if policies guarantying the conservation of cleanliness, of congestion and of equipments were not maintained. But they are willing to pay only (1) for the maintenance of landscape quality and of cleanliness and (2) at their current level. These conclusions seem to prove the existence of lexicographic preferences. But the latter are not easily taken into account, especially in WTP estimation studies. / Les services fournis par le patrimoine naturel, notamment pour des usages de loisirs, sont marques par une forte heterogeneite. Des lors, l'analyse de la demande a tout interet a en integrer les caracteristiques dans son champ d'investigation. En foret par exemple, les visiteurs recherchent a la fois des attributs naturels et des equipements materiels. La question se pose donc de l'importance relative de chacun de ces elements dans le choix de visite. Toutefois, les methodes traditionnelles d'evaluation des services recreatifs ne sont pas adaptes a l'etude de ces changements multi-dimensionnels (Hanley et al., 2001). Il faut donc avoir recours a une methode alternative : la Methode des Choix Multi-Attributs (Bennett & Blamey, 2001). Basee sur l'approche multi-attributs de Lancaster (1971) et sur la theorie de l'utilite aleatoire (Manski, 1977 ; McFadden, 1974), elle permet d'etudier les preferences des visiteurs et d'inferer leur Consentement-A-Payer (CAP) pour chaque attribut. Nous proposons son application aux forets domaniales de Gironde. Une enquete a ete menee en juillet-aout 2006 aupres d'un echantillon de la population residente. Selon les traitements econometriques, la structure de decision n'est pas arborescente et le logit multinomial doit etre privilegie. Les resultats montrent que, meme si les residents perdraient en utilite si les politiques de maintien de la qualite de la proprete, de la frequentation et des equipements n'etaient pas maintenues, ils sont disposes a payer pour la conservation uniquement (1) de la qualite paysagere et de la proprete et (2) a leur niveau actuel. Ces conclusions semblent prouver l'existence de preferences lexicographiques. Or ces dernieres sont difficiles a prendre en compte dans l'estimation de CAP notamment." @default.
• W2271030593 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2271030593 creator A5002492091 @default.
• W2271030593 creator A5040721632 @default.
• W2271030593 creator A5063665312 @default.
• W2271030593 date "2008-06-09" @default.
• W2271030593 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2271030593 title "Valuing preferences for outdoor recreation in french forests : choice experiment approach" @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1503172361 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1544877708 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1547920712 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1550812296 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1602640219 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1672471372 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1970838958 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1979491727 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1989485993 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1990125348 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1991920511 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1992385737 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W1996879531 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2015901745 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2027739325 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2029636682 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2031990091 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2039810561 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2040637082 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2048711016 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2049581452 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2069474958 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2071091271 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2078967366 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2082423817 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2098910318 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2102914395 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2104004144 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2112998036 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2114026511 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2126826663 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2146584964 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2152081677 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2167009471 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2167759796 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W3025622380 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W3125221422 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W3126088314 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W412148965 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W46055006 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W659596857 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W99501841 @default.
• W2271030593 cites W2147780192 @default.
• W2271030593 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2271030593 type Work @default.
• W2271030593 sameAs 2271030593 @default.
• W2271030593 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2271030593 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2271030593 hasAuthorship W2271030593A5002492091 @default.
• W2271030593 hasAuthorship W2271030593A5040721632 @default.
• W2271030593 hasAuthorship W2271030593A5063665312 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConcept C110269972 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConceptScore W2271030593C110269972 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConceptScore W2271030593C18903297 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConceptScore W2271030593C41008148 @default.
• W2271030593 hasConceptScore W2271030593C86803240 @default.
• W2271030593 hasLocation W22710305931 @default.
• W2271030593 hasLocation W22710305932 @default.
• W2271030593 hasLocation W22710305933 @default.
• W2271030593 hasOpenAccess W2271030593 @default.
• W2271030593 hasPrimaryLocation W22710305931 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W2144162696 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W2598675290 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W3021009724 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W3128152786 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W3138005922 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W3208768832 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W890318350 @default.
• W2271030593 hasRelatedWork W3106732133 @default.
• W2271030593 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2271030593 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2271030593 magId "2271030593" @default.
• W2271030593 workType "article" @default.