Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2271623863> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2271623863 endingPage "e0143632" @default.
- W2271623863 startingPage "e0143632" @default.
- W2271623863 abstract "Context Our center’s quality improvement optimization process on many occasions anecdotally suggested that oocyte assessments might enhance embryo assessment in predicting pregnancy chances with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Objective To prospectively compare a morphologic oocyte grading system to standard day-3 morphologic embryo assessment. Design, Setting, Patients We prospectively investigated in a private academically-affiliated infertility center 94 consecutive IVF cycles based on 6 criteria for oocyte quality: morphology, cytoplasm, perivitelline space (PVS), zona pellucida (ZP), polar body (PB) and oocyte size, each assigned a value of -1 (worst), 0 (average) or +1 (best), so establishing an average total oocyte score (TOS). Embryo assessment utilized grade and cell numbers of each embryo on day-3 after oocyte retrieval. Clinical pregnancy was defined by presence of at least one intrauterine gestational sac. Interventions Standard IVF cycles in infertile women. Main Outcome Measures Predictability of pregnancy based on oocyte and embryo-grading systems. Results Average age for all patients was 36.5 ± 7.3 years; mean oocyte yield was 7.97± 5.76; Patient specific total oocyte score (PTOS) was -1.05 ± 2.24. PTOS, adjusted for patient age, was directly related to odds of increased embryo cell numbers (OR 1.12, P = 0.025), embryo grade (OR 1.19, P < 0.001) and clinical pregnancy [OR 1.58 (95%CI 1.23 to 2.02), P < 0.001]. Restricting the analysis to day three embryos of high quality (8-cell/ good grades), TOS was still predictive of clinical pregnancy (OR 2.08 (95%CI 1.26 to 3.44, P = 0.004). Among the 69 patients with embryos of Grade 4 or better available for transfer 23 achieved Clinical Pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to the 69 transfers with good quality embryos (≥ Grade 4) the Oocyte Scoring System (TOS) (AUC±SE 0.863±0.044, oocyte score) provided significantly greater predictive value for clinical pregnancy compared to the embryo grade alone (AUC 0.646 ± 0.072, embryo grade) p = 0.015. Conclusions Oocyte-scoring, thus, provides useful clinical information especially in good prognosis patients with large numbers of high quality embryos. This finding appears of particular importance at a time when many IVF centers are committing sizable investments to closed incubation systems with time-lapse photography, which are exclusively meant to define embryo morphology." @default.
- W2271623863 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5010507657 @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5026319425 @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5059415485 @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5060027994 @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5067500150 @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5076136580 @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5085797038 @default.
- W2271623863 creator A5091906269 @default.
- W2271623863 date "2015-12-02" @default.
- W2271623863 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2271623863 title "Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most" @default.
- W2271623863 cites W1505124436 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W1967002053 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W1971674991 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W1997113689 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2004457041 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2011018150 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2020117686 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2022703246 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2032122214 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2032169144 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2042128372 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2055777560 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2059242417 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2061130521 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2061837610 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2065669975 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2087927048 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2101862701 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2108072553 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2112042658 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2114836662 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2117894896 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2126645267 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2127730061 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2140015897 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2141786872 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2150027346 @default.
- W2271623863 cites W2172215552 @default.
- W2271623863 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143632" @default.
- W2271623863 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4668065" @default.
- W2271623863 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26630267" @default.
- W2271623863 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2271623863 type Work @default.
- W2271623863 sameAs 2271623863 @default.
- W2271623863 citedByCount "75" @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632016 @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632017 @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632018 @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632019 @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632020 @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632021 @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632022 @default.
- W2271623863 countsByYear W22716238632023 @default.
- W2271623863 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5010507657 @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5026319425 @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5059415485 @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5060027994 @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5067500150 @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5076136580 @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5085797038 @default.
- W2271623863 hasAuthorship W2271623863A5091906269 @default.
- W2271623863 hasBestOaLocation W22716238631 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C160099875 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C16685009 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C196843134 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C2776010925 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C2776659692 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C2776690073 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C2777542035 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C2994278967 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C500014431 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C512716672 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C88972607 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C105702510 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C131872663 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C160099875 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C16685009 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C196843134 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C2776010925 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C2776659692 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C2776690073 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C2777542035 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C2777688143 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C2779234561 @default.
- W2271623863 hasConceptScore W2271623863C29456083 @default.