FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2272210945> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2272210945 endingPage "1171" @default.
• W2272210945 startingPage "1163" @default.
• W2272210945 abstract "Background College administrative and management leaders, foodservice personnel, and student residents value social, nutritional, financial, and environmental sustainability in their dining expectations. Menu choice reduction looks promising as a strategy to achieve these goals. However, foodservice research about dominant attitudes across these stakeholders is limited. Objective To identify qualitative views from all stakeholders about choice reduction to ensure that any changes to the meal service are not to the detriment of consumer satisfaction. Design A comprehensive list of 74 statements representing the spectrum of attitudes surrounding choice was generated by searching a variety of resources, including academic literature and Internet sites, and by conducting semistructured interviews with stakeholders. A final set of 42 statements resulted from researcher scrutiny for optimum balance, clarity, appropriateness, simplicity, and applicability. A new sample of participants was then asked to sort these 42 statements into a normal distribution grid from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” Participants/setting A purposive convenience sample of stakeholders (staff n=5 and residents n=4) was used to identify statements about choice reduction. A second sample of stakeholders (staff n=6 and residents n=29) were recruited to sort the final 42 statements. Statistical analyses performed Q methodology analysis techniques were used. This involved conducting a by-person factor analysis, using the centroid factor extraction method because of the permissiveness it allows for data exploration. A varimax factor rotation to enhance interpretability of the results identified shared viewpoints. Results Three dominant viewpoints toward the possibility of choice reduction in the meal service were identified. Factor 1 was “health driven” (in which healthiness was paramount). Factor 2 was “variety seekers” (in which choice had instrumental value). Factor 3 was “choice lovers” (in which choice had intrinsic value). Conclusions Although participants could see a number of benefits of choice reduction, strong attitudinal barriers existed toward adopting choice reduction initiatives. These barriers need to be overcome to avoid dissatisfaction with the foodservice should choice reduction measures be implemented." @default.
• W2272210945 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2272210945 creator A5001963719 @default.
• W2272210945 creator A5067777334 @default.
• W2272210945 creator A5083042321 @default.
• W2272210945 date "2016-07-01" @default.
• W2272210945 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2272210945 title "The Possibilities of Reducing Food Choice to Improve the Performance of College Foodservices" @default.
• W2272210945 cites W1508462900 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W1543360788 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W1981257212 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W1982973538 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W1989072888 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2038299555 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2039208594 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2047635246 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2051957825 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2067298660 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2072059287 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2086089338 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2100199039 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2111875134 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2129660502 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2132175544 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2135202459 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2135501495 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2147233306 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2149340185 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W2168186509 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W4248842839 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W4256005559 @default.
• W2272210945 cites W4312973857 @default.
• W2272210945 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.12.019" @default.
• W2272210945 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26876360" @default.
• W2272210945 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2272210945 type Work @default.
• W2272210945 sameAs 2272210945 @default.
• W2272210945 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2272210945 countsByYear W22722109452017 @default.
• W2272210945 countsByYear W22722109452019 @default.
• W2272210945 countsByYear W22722109452020 @default.
• W2272210945 countsByYear W22722109452021 @default.
• W2272210945 countsByYear W22722109452023 @default.
• W2272210945 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2272210945 hasAuthorship W2272210945A5001963719 @default.
• W2272210945 hasAuthorship W2272210945A5067777334 @default.
• W2272210945 hasAuthorship W2272210945A5083042321 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C179861144 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C2776035091 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C2777146004 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C106906290 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C119857082 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C142362112 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C144133560 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C153349607 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C15744967 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C162853370 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C179861144 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C185592680 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C189430467 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C198531522 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C2776035091 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C2777146004 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C2780378061 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C41008148 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C43617362 @default.
• W2272210945 hasConceptScore W2272210945C55493867 @default.
• W2272210945 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2272210945 hasLocation W22722109451 @default.
• W2272210945 hasLocation W22722109452 @default.
• W2272210945 hasOpenAccess W2272210945 @default.
• W2272210945 hasPrimaryLocation W22722109451 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W1486883295 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W2032850860 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W2092179559 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W2099873605 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W2151616761 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W2367743448 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W2386555993 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W2999851138 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W3149076771 @default.
• W2272210945 hasRelatedWork W4285668626 @default.
• W2272210945 hasVolume "116" @default.
• W2272210945 isParatext "false" @default.

• next