FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2272707835> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2272707835 abstract "This paper criticises the assumption that maintaining the EU Socio-Economic Model(s) has become difficult only with the three crises that rattled the world and the € area from 2008. It concedes, however, that tensions between the political priorities underlying the EU internal market, Economic and Monetary Union and the competitiveness agenda of EU socio-economic governance on the one hand and the values of social inclusion and social justice proclaimed as all-encompassing by the EU Treaties have become more apparent. While there is no philosopher's stone on how to alleviate these tensions, the paper identifies four key issues that need to be addressed: (1) the institutional asymmetry of the EU's economic and monetary union (EMU), stemming from unifying the currency and maintaining national prerogatives in economic policies, (2) substantive tensions between the EU's so called economic constitution and its normative commitment to social justice, (3) the question whether and how socio-economic policy can be delivered at EU levels in the absence of legislative competences and (4) the future of the EU and its socio-economic model as a global load star. The paper initially develops the notion socio-economic model in three dimensions: as a heuristic tool identifying a common core of the national socio-economic models, as programmatic notion and finally as an (incomplete) normative commitment. Having concluded that the EU is normatively committed to reconcile economic and social aspects of its models, it proceeds to identify cleavages in the EU governance modes available. It questions one of the assumptions underlying the hypothesis of the asymmetry of European integration: the assumption that negative integration, by enforcing Treaty Law through the Court of Justice is more successful than positive integration, especially if the latter has to rely on mere policy coordination instead of legislation. It can be shown that the combination of all three modes of governance, which is available in EU economic policy at times, is the most efficient. This even holds true if - as in economic policy - legislative harmonisation is replaced by executive coercion for a certain set of national policies. The paper does not offer a solution as to how EU level socio-economic policy efficiency can be achieved in the absence of consensus and competence, though. It merely concludes that the way forward lies in combining deeper integration with respect for diversity of the EU's regions, and the establishment of transnational solidarity." @default.
• W2272707835 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2272707835 creator A5003843371 @default.
• W2272707835 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2272707835 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2272707835 title "The EU's Socio-Economic Model(s) and the Crisi(e)s Any Perspectives?" @default.
• W2272707835 cites W148367932 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1487867081 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1492534877 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1493921677 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1511626716 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1515633838 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1565878686 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1608640229 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1653115279 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1792761044 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1924902924 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1970840722 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1984350077 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1987372134 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W1995296080 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2017207826 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2036375219 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2095838103 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2096747026 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2111832381 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2120245132 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2140930388 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2148104378 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2148197894 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2168018791 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2467865206 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2477082216 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2490579119 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W2700665287 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W3022636567 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W304130830 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W3125633713 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W4206056658 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W4211237516 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W4229738978 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W4238469216 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W4243042505 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W4245176870 @default.
• W2272707835 cites W4254417922 @default.
• W2272707835 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2386217" @default.
• W2272707835 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2272707835 type Work @default.
• W2272707835 sameAs 2272707835 @default.
• W2272707835 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2272707835 countsByYear W22727078352014 @default.
• W2272707835 countsByYear W22727078352016 @default.
• W2272707835 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2272707835 hasAuthorship W2272707835A5003843371 @default.
• W2272707835 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2272707835 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2272707835 hasConceptScore W2272707835C162324750 @default.
• W2272707835 hasConceptScore W2272707835C17744445 @default.
• W2272707835 hasLocation W22727078351 @default.
• W2272707835 hasOpenAccess W2272707835 @default.
• W2272707835 hasPrimaryLocation W22727078351 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W1502198272 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W1986173648 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W1998718379 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W2006758266 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W2017540542 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W2054677056 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W2073254488 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W2084227502 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2272707835 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2272707835 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2272707835 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2272707835 magId "2272707835" @default.
• W2272707835 workType "article" @default.