Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W22727442> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 79 of
79
with 100 items per page.
- W22727442 endingPage "362" @default.
- W22727442 startingPage "351" @default.
- W22727442 abstract "In the present paper, I will provide an account of general-pragmatic theories, such as Grice’s theory or ‘relevance theory’. Secondly, I will detail the insufficiency of ‘relevance theory’ in defining the content of maxims within the legal context. The accounts of possible maxims’ content in law tend to treat the subject in a strictly Gricean way. They neglect other theories in modern linguistics or philosophy of language. However, it appears that neither of these theories can provide us with a sufficient vision of legal maxims. Although there exist some similarities between the ordinary and legal speech, I will provide for differences which render them two almost incompatible projects. The relevance-theoretic approach appears only fairly narrowly applicable to the realm of law, as its basic assumption of increasing effect while decreasing effort is a flawed statement in the legal domain. Legislative speech is a collective speech act, while the analytical tools developed in Sperber and Wilson’s theory are designed to explain individual speech. The fact, that an interpretation is easily accessible does not make it automatically more relevant in law. However, intentions are a central notion in the legal discourse. The communicative intention defined by Sperber and Wilson is an adequate reformulation of the legislator’s will to convey a normative content of its propositions. Nevertheless, neither the content of maxims defined by Grice, nor by Sperber and Wilson, provide a fully adequate account of what their content in law could be. There remains a need to search for a more exact theory." @default.
- W22727442 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W22727442 creator A5032809466 @default.
- W22727442 date "2014-11-08" @default.
- W22727442 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W22727442 title "Implicatures Within the Legal Context: A Rule-Based Analysis of the Possible Content of Conversational Maxims in Law" @default.
- W22727442 cites W1975824152 @default.
- W22727442 cites W2106700003 @default.
- W22727442 cites W2128812660 @default.
- W22727442 cites W2264742718 @default.
- W22727442 cites W2286874445 @default.
- W22727442 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09375-8_26" @default.
- W22727442 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W22727442 type Work @default.
- W22727442 sameAs 22727442 @default.
- W22727442 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W22727442 countsByYear W227274422019 @default.
- W22727442 countsByYear W227274422023 @default.
- W22727442 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
- W22727442 hasAuthorship W22727442A5032809466 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C11693617 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C2776802673 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C2777415597 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C2778152352 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W22727442 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C111472728 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C11693617 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C134306372 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C138885662 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C151730666 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C15744967 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C158154518 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C169760540 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C169900460 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C17744445 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C199539241 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C2776802673 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C2777415597 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C2778152352 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C2779343474 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C33923547 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C41895202 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C44725695 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C527412718 @default.
- W22727442 hasConceptScore W22727442C86803240 @default.
- W22727442 hasLocation W227274421 @default.
- W22727442 hasOpenAccess W22727442 @default.
- W22727442 hasPrimaryLocation W227274421 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W2349006033 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W2349187792 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W2365710869 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W2375871339 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W2391041985 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W2495397870 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W3165204569 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W4238302420 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W4254814036 @default.
- W22727442 hasRelatedWork W4297470826 @default.
- W22727442 isParatext "false" @default.
- W22727442 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W22727442 magId "22727442" @default.
- W22727442 workType "book-chapter" @default.