FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2273106388> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2273106388 abstract "Bibliographic databases are the primary resource for identifying systematic reviews of health care interventions. Reliable retrieval of systematic reviews depends on the scope of indexing used by database providers. Therefore, searching one database may be insufficient, but it is unclear how many need to be searched. We sought to evaluate the performance of seven major bibliographic databases for the identification of systematic reviews for hypertension. We searched seven databases (Cochrane library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Epistemonikos, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), PubMed Health and Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP)) from 2003 to 2015 for systematic reviews of any intervention for hypertension. Citations retrieved were screened for relevance, coded and checked for screening consistency using a fuzzy text matching query. The performance of each database was assessed by calculating its sensitivity, precision, the number of missed reviews and the number of unique records retrieved. Four hundred systematic reviews were identified for inclusion from 11,381 citations retrieved from seven databases. No single database identified all the retrieved systematic reviews for hypertension. EMBASE identified the most reviews (sensitivity 69 %) but also retrieved the most irrelevant citations with 7.2 % precision (Pr). The sensitivity of the Cochrane library was 60 %, DARE 57 %, MEDLINE 57 %, PubMed Health 53 %, Epistemonikos 49 % and TRIP 33 %. EMBASE contained the highest number of unique records (n = 43). The Cochrane library identified seven unique records and had the highest precision (Pr = 30 %), followed by Epistemonikos (n = 2, Pr = 19 %). No unique records were found in PubMed Health (Pr = 24 %) DARE (Pr = 21 %), TRIP (Pr = 10 %) or MEDLINE (Pr = 10 %). Searching EMBASE and the Cochrane library identified 88 % of all systematic reviews in the reference set, and searching the freely available databases (Cochrane, Epistemonikos, MEDLINE) identified 83 % of all the reviews. The databases were re-analysed after systematic reviews of non-conventional interventions (e.g. yoga, acupuncture) were removed. Similarly, no database identified all the retrieved systematic reviews. EMBASE identified the most relevant systematic reviews (sensitivity 73 %) but also retrieved the most irrelevant citations with Pr = 5 %. The sensitivity of the Cochrane database was 62 %, followed by MEDLINE (60 %), DARE (55 %), PubMed Health (54 %), Epistemonikos (50 %) and TRIP (31 %). The precision of the Cochrane library was the highest (20 %), followed by PubMed Health (Pr = 16 %), DARE (Pr = 13 %), Epistemonikos (Pr = 12 %), MEDLINE (Pr = 6 %), TRIP (Pr = 6 %) and EMBASE (Pr = 5 %). EMBASE contained the most unique records (n = 34). The Cochrane library identified seven unique records. The other databases held no unique records. The coverage of bibliographic databases varies considerably due to differences in their scope and content. Researchers wishing to identify systematic reviews should not rely on one database but search multiple databases." @default.
• W2273106388 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2273106388 creator A5005751643 @default.
• W2273106388 creator A5053694753 @default.
• W2273106388 creator A5080289737 @default.
• W2273106388 creator A5090700680 @default.
• W2273106388 date "2016-02-09" @default.
• W2273106388 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2273106388 title "A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension" @default.
• W2273106388 cites W1561556558 @default.
• W2273106388 cites W2033498751 @default.
• W2273106388 cites W2036098942 @default.
• W2273106388 cites W2124893143 @default.
• W2273106388 cites W2146668368 @default.
• W2273106388 cites W2164569333 @default.
• W2273106388 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5" @default.
• W2273106388 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4748526" @default.
• W2273106388 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26862061" @default.
• W2273106388 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2273106388 type Work @default.
• W2273106388 sameAs 2273106388 @default.
• W2273106388 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2273106388 countsByYear W22731063882017 @default.
• W2273106388 countsByYear W22731063882018 @default.
• W2273106388 countsByYear W22731063882019 @default.
• W2273106388 countsByYear W22731063882020 @default.
• W2273106388 countsByYear W22731063882021 @default.
• W2273106388 countsByYear W22731063882022 @default.
• W2273106388 countsByYear W22731063882023 @default.
• W2273106388 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2273106388 hasAuthorship W2273106388A5005751643 @default.
• W2273106388 hasAuthorship W2273106388A5053694753 @default.
• W2273106388 hasAuthorship W2273106388A5080289737 @default.
• W2273106388 hasAuthorship W2273106388A5090700680 @default.
• W2273106388 hasBestOaLocation W22731063881 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C2779980791 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C118552586 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C126322002 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C17744445 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C189708586 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C199539241 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C23123220 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C27415008 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C2776478404 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C2779473830 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C2779980791 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C41008148 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C512399662 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C71924100 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C77088390 @default.
• W2273106388 hasConceptScore W2273106388C95190672 @default.
• W2273106388 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2273106388 hasLocation W22731063881 @default.
• W2273106388 hasLocation W22731063882 @default.
• W2273106388 hasLocation W22731063883 @default.
• W2273106388 hasLocation W22731063884 @default.
• W2273106388 hasLocation W22731063885 @default.
• W2273106388 hasLocation W22731063886 @default.
• W2273106388 hasLocation W22731063887 @default.
• W2273106388 hasOpenAccess W2273106388 @default.
• W2273106388 hasPrimaryLocation W22731063881 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W1907340112 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W2273106388 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W2909928837 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W3027459656 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W3082854370 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W3134414398 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W4281920545 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W4307384190 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W4315436681 @default.
• W2273106388 hasRelatedWork W4318979796 @default.
• W2273106388 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2273106388 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2273106388 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2273106388 magId "2273106388" @default.
• W2273106388 workType "article" @default.