FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2274910366> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2274910366 endingPage "508" @default.
• W2274910366 startingPage "495" @default.
• W2274910366 abstract "The Littérature-monde vs. the Parisian Publishing Empire Holly Collins le français est beaucoup plus qu’une langue. il est un lieu d’échanges et de rencontres. ses frontières se sont dissoutes dans la totalité du monde, ce qui ne signifie pas un déracinement ni une vulnérabilité, mais au contraire une plus grande liberté, une audace et une résonance nouvelles. J.M.G. Le Clézio In March 2007, forty-five French-language authors published in Le Monde a manifesto “Pour une ‘littérature-monde’ en français,” declaring their independence and the independence of the French language from the center, the Hexagone itself. They called their movement a Copernican Revolution. For France, the putative “point depuis lequel était supposée rayonner une littérature franco-française,” had lost its place as the center of the French-speaking world (Le Bris et al.) The preceding autumn, all of the great literature prizes had been awarded to authors from outside of France, signaling an overwhelming decentralization. The Le Monde manifesto proclaims: “le centre, nous disent les prix d’automne, est désormais partout, aux quatre coins du monde” (Le Bris et al.). The signatories further declared that the colonial pact had been broken and that “la langue délivrée devient l’affaire de tous” (Le Bris et al.). The publication of Pour une littérature monde, a collection of essays by twenty-six of the manifesto’s signatories, edited by Michel Le Bris and Jean Rouaud, followed in 2007. Though the ideas and ideals presented in the manifesto find broad support, the questions and tensions provoked by the manifesto and subsequent collection of essays deserve more attention. In her introduction to the collection of essays Les littératures de langue française à l’heure de la mondialisation, a response to Pour une littérature monde (PLM), editor Lise Gauvin insists that one cannot help but agree with and [End Page 495] applaud certain aspects of the manifesto and essays (17). Yet, insists Gauvin, the manifesto raises many questions, and, while PLM provides some answers, much is left unresolved (17). Along the same lines, I argue in particular that the practical and logistical impediments to publishing on a large scale are a significant aspect that has not been given sufficient attention when considering a de-centered, liberated world-literature in the French language. How powerful is the manifesto for a littérature-monde against the near monopoly of the Parisian publishing industry? Though many other options exist for publishing, especially in Quebec, Switzerland, and Belgium, Paris as the center and a threshold through which most must pass to publish literature in the French language maintains its strong grasp on a so-called “French” literature. The “Galligrasseuil”s of Paris resist a loss of power and dehierarchization of literatures in the French language, however passive the struggle may seem.1 As Jacques Godbout affirms in his contribution to PLM, Paris has remained “le banquier de la littérature,” and France “accrochée à son espace littéraire national, et ses maisons d’édition à leurs réseaux hexagonaux” (104–05). The distinction between writers whom publishers portray as “French” – principally, those lacking any distinguishing physical difference from the predominantly white, European French – and writers labeled “Francophone” – those outside of the white, Christian European mold – is easily maintained, especially in the print world, as long as the name of these latter writers remains distinctly not “French.” As Anna Moï has pointed out, publishers readily classify white authors from the North as French and authors from the South with “black” or “yellow” skin as Francophone (Le Bris 24). In these cases, successful authors like Calixthe Beyala may still find themselves published under editions such as J’ai lu. J’ai lu, though well known, is not the edition of choice for high literature. Rather, according to its website, since J’ai lu’s creation in 1958, it has specialized in popular literature and publishes in a number of domains: general literature, detective novels, science fiction, fantasy, romance, esoterism, well-being, and erotic novels. Earlier versions of the website included “le pratique, le manga et plus récemment la..." @default.
• W2274910366 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2274910366 creator A5038402119 @default.
• W2274910366 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2274910366 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2274910366 title "The Littérature-monde vs. the Parisian Publishing Empire" @default.
• W2274910366 cites W1527217294 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W1582534520 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W1998377638 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W2030441354 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W2526503592 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W319454581 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W638085133 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W2907238007 @default.
• W2274910366 cites W625914273 @default.
• W2274910366 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/rmc.2015.0061" @default.
• W2274910366 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2274910366 type Work @default.
• W2274910366 sameAs 2274910366 @default.
• W2274910366 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2274910366 countsByYear W22749103662020 @default.
• W2274910366 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2274910366 hasAuthorship W2274910366A5038402119 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C2778495208 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C2778896172 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C35651441 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C105795698 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C142362112 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C15708023 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C17744445 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C195244886 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C199539241 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C2778495208 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C2778896172 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C33923547 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C35651441 @default.
• W2274910366 hasConceptScore W2274910366C95457728 @default.
• W2274910366 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2274910366 hasLocation W22749103661 @default.
• W2274910366 hasOpenAccess W2274910366 @default.
• W2274910366 hasPrimaryLocation W22749103661 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W2004653172 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W2042764810 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W2103707647 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W2111865594 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W2154853728 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W2549268075 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W4249890721 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W4285480926 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W654812299 @default.
• W2274910366 hasRelatedWork W3107229818 @default.
• W2274910366 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W2274910366 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2274910366 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2274910366 magId "2274910366" @default.
• W2274910366 workType "article" @default.