Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2275133766> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2275133766 endingPage "1819" @default.
- W2275133766 startingPage "1800" @default.
- W2275133766 abstract "Abstract Understanding the role of landscape heterogeneity and its influence on the scaling behavior of surface fluxes as observed by satellite sensors with different spatial resolutions is a critical need to investigate. In this study, the effects of pixel scales on ETc estimation and other parameters that are used to calculate ETc were investigated over different vegetation surfaces in south central Nebraska, USA. Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) was used to estimate spatially distributed ETc by combining ground‐based meteorological data for Landsat and MODIS imagery. The estimated surface energy fluxes were compared and validated to the measured Bowen Ratio Energy Balance System (BREBS) ETc fluxes. Validation results showed that Landsat has more preferable spatial resolution (30 m) to map and analyze ETc ; regression models explained 91% of the variability in the observed data (RMSD = 0.064 mm/h; MBE = 0.04 mm/h). However, for MODIS‐based ETc , the regression model explained only 59% of the variability in observed ETc with a larger error (RMSD = 0.17 mm/h; MBE = 0.15 mm/h). MODIS‐based ETc was about 31% higher than the measured ETc . Imperfect assessment in MODIS‐based retrievals is due to the underlying assumption of spatial heterogeneity and coarser sensor pixel scale (500 m), which was summarized by up‐scaling the Landsat images to MODIS images using output flux aggregation and input up‐scaling procedure using simple average and nearest neighbor aggregation techniques and comparisons were made on both image and pixel scales. Aggregation results illustrate that simple average with output flux aggregation provides close interpretation in aggregating fluxes to coarser resolution than other aggregation approaches. Pixel‐by‐pixel comparison using output aggregation with simple average resulted in close agreement (error range 5%–35%) between measured and up‐scaled fluxes, compared to input up‐scaling using simple average (error range 25%–60%). Larger error in input up‐scaling is due to the changes in the surface roughness parameters due to aggregation in SEBS model. In addition, the magnitude of errors in ETc estimation was observed to be a function of the heterogeneity of the land surface and evaporative elements over the study region. Comparison between up‐scaled ETc at 480 m spatial resolution with original MODIS image at 500 m showed that the output aggregation using simple average aggregation method provided closer representation of ETc at 500 m MODIS pixel resolution than the nearest neighbor resampling method." @default.
- W2275133766 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2275133766 creator A5041801259 @default.
- W2275133766 creator A5049513505 @default.
- W2275133766 creator A5074296013 @default.
- W2275133766 date "2016-03-01" @default.
- W2275133766 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2275133766 title "Impact of scale/resolution on evapotranspiration from Landsat and MODIS images" @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1965115805 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1966664222 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1968508976 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1980320347 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1983621387 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1987210941 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1991338338 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W1999453414 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2001564322 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2011018294 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2013239809 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2017533211 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2018318189 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2023316245 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2029609677 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2030841267 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2032963749 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2033157101 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2033854240 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2037499147 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2047195451 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2047783950 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2056093888 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2056124940 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2061003790 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2061554185 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2062417853 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2065454207 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2071577120 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2076328809 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2081155979 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2086975319 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2095029195 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2096026309 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2097816657 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2100697883 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2101764894 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2109282623 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2112773781 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2115688622 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2116310314 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2117098900 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2126349297 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2129852557 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2129859781 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2137341626 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2145114759 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2147655187 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2152228856 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2154390958 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2162283024 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2167557465 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2170523364 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W2567350912 @default.
- W2275133766 cites W4299847412 @default.
- W2275133766 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017772" @default.
- W2275133766 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2275133766 type Work @default.
- W2275133766 sameAs 2275133766 @default.
- W2275133766 citedByCount "34" @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662016 @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662017 @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662018 @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662019 @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662020 @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662021 @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662022 @default.
- W2275133766 countsByYear W22751337662023 @default.
- W2275133766 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2275133766 hasAuthorship W2275133766A5041801259 @default.
- W2275133766 hasAuthorship W2275133766A5049513505 @default.
- W2275133766 hasAuthorship W2275133766A5074296013 @default.
- W2275133766 hasBestOaLocation W22751337661 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C160633673 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C176783924 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C19269812 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C205372480 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C2776133958 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C2777423268 @default.
- W2275133766 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.