FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2276975926> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2276975926 endingPage "147" @default.
• W2276975926 startingPage "136" @default.
• W2276975926 abstract "Following the transfer of supervisory powers in the system of highest level arbitrazh courts to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, some 350 tax cases have been heard. On the basis of judicial acts passed, it is possible to establish the positions adopted by the Supreme Court of the RF in resolving tax disputes, set out the tax risks inherent in the process of performance of entrepreneurial activity, and also asses the outlook for court examinations with tax authorities. The article describes the general nature of acts of the Supreme Court of the RF and examines their significance in the formation of practice concerning tax disputes. The author addresses issues regarding the implementation of various judicial concepts (for example, the concept of the good faith of the taxpayer and due diligence). Attention is drawn to general questions of tax legislation in the part concerning application of the method of calculating tax obligations and distinction between various forms of tax control (cameral and field inspections). At present, the Russian government is paying particular attention to the administration of value added tax. A system of total control over payment of VAT is being instituted with the aid of electronic technologies (formation of the BIG DATA system). Consequently acts of the Supreme Court of the RF relating to disputes concerning VAT acquire special importance. The article analyzes the more interesting cases involving VAT examined by the Supreme Court in 2014. The author presents an evaluation of the feasibility of the approaches of the courts in resolving various disputes connected with VAT. In the practice of the Supreme Court of the RF, a significant number of acts touch upon questions pertaining to payment of tax on profit by organizations. This issue required their separate examination in the present article. Moreover, special attention is given to disputes connected with the application of agreements on avoidance of dual taxation upon the payment of tax on profit by organizations. The author notes the emergence of a negative tendency of divergence from the principle of the priority of international law in the resolution of tax disputes." @default.
• W2276975926 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2276975926 creator A5028046175 @default.
• W2276975926 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2276975926 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2276975926 title "Trends in the Supreme Court of Russia Case Practice of 2014 (Tax Disputes)" @default.
• W2276975926 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2276975926 type Work @default.
• W2276975926 sameAs 2276975926 @default.
• W2276975926 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2276975926 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2276975926 hasAuthorship W2276975926A5028046175 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C193681711 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C2776360696 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConcept C551662922 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C144133560 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C162324750 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C17744445 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C190253527 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C193681711 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C199539241 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C2776360696 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C2777351106 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C2778272461 @default.
• W2276975926 hasConceptScore W2276975926C551662922 @default.
• W2276975926 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2276975926 hasLocation W22769759261 @default.
• W2276975926 hasOpenAccess W2276975926 @default.
• W2276975926 hasPrimaryLocation W22769759261 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W1505744407 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W1585785804 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2122499933 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2160562063 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2207331638 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2269954134 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2278085280 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2356056737 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2358406054 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2361519197 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2747200580 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W2952632309 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3009151185 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3021031029 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3121016473 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3121579571 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3164494749 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3179623258 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3214514408 @default.
• W2276975926 hasRelatedWork W3123289795 @default.
• W2276975926 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2276975926 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2276975926 magId "2276975926" @default.
• W2276975926 workType "article" @default.