Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2277743079> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W2277743079 abstract "Author(s): Huynh, Linda U. | Advisor(s): Johnson, Earl | Abstract: ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: Traditionally, panoramic radiographs have been used to evaluate mesiodistal tooth angulation; however, with the development of 3-D CBCT technology, perhaps a better measurement of tooth angulation can be obtained. The purposes of this study were to: 1). Compare the mesiodistal tooth angulations determined from a typodont (gold standard) with measurements of tooth angulations from panoramic and CBCT radiographs. 2). Compare the differences in the quantity, location, and direction of mesiodistal bracket repositioning by CBCT and panoramic assessment by the same orthodontic examiner and between different examiners. 3). Assess which method of root assessment (CBCT or panoramic) examiners felt more confident using to diagnose root position.METHODS: A typodont with radiographic markings of each tooth's long axis was used as the gold standard. The root angulation measurements were compared to measurements from panoramic and CBCT images. Twenty-five consecutive subjects had a panoramic radiograph and CBCT scan taken on the same day. All 56 images (panoramic or CBCT) were randomized and evaluated by ten orthodontic examiners to identity each tooth they felt needed to be repositioned in order to obtain parallel roots. A questionnaire was given at the end of the study to rate their confidence level in using each method to assess root positioning.RESULTS: Compared to the typodont gold standard, the CBCT produced more accurate measurements of root angulation than the panoramic image (Pl0.05). The two different radiographic methods provided a different assessment in the quantity, location, and direction of bracket repositioning. The teeth with the most disagreement between the two methods were the maxillary second premolar, canine, lateral incisor, and the mandibular first premolar. The panoramic image tends to over-report the maxillary lateral incisors and canines to need distal root tip, and under-report the maxillary premolars and mandibular 1st premolars to need distal root tip. In general, examiners felt more confident using CBCT to diagnose root position.CONCLUSION: The CBCT data provided a more accurate representation of mesiodistal tooth angulation when compared to the panoramic radiograph. Using a panoramic radiograph to evaluate root position is inaccurate and will cause the examiner to reposition the wrong teeth." @default.
- W2277743079 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2277743079 creator A5062783683 @default.
- W2277743079 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W2277743079 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2277743079 title "Comparison of Panoramic and Cone Beam CT Radiography in the Assessment of Root Angulation" @default.
- W2277743079 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2277743079 type Work @default.
- W2277743079 sameAs 2277743079 @default.
- W2277743079 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2277743079 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2277743079 hasAuthorship W2277743079A5062783683 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C100548800 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C133769200 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C3018399558 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C100548800 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C126838900 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C127413603 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C133769200 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C199343813 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C2779813781 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C29694066 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C3018399558 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C36454342 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C40993552 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C544519230 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C71924100 @default.
- W2277743079 hasConceptScore W2277743079C78519656 @default.
- W2277743079 hasLocation W22777430791 @default.
- W2277743079 hasOpenAccess W2277743079 @default.
- W2277743079 hasPrimaryLocation W22777430791 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2008141303 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2014307022 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2039906352 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2081608387 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2106908382 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2120558308 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2162178393 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2252775870 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2358338089 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2359061611 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2387128544 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2413673320 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2513629214 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2603615886 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2613961173 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W2791105814 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W3092265624 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W3133721548 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W3164729979 @default.
- W2277743079 hasRelatedWork W589815589 @default.
- W2277743079 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2277743079 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2277743079 magId "2277743079" @default.
- W2277743079 workType "article" @default.