FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2279367042> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2279367042 abstract "Background Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2009. Objectives To assess the effect of routine versus selective or no shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting people for shunting. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2013), EMBASE (1980 to August 2013) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to August 2013). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, checked reference lists, and contacted experts in the field. Selection criteria Randomised and quasi‐randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Data collection and analysis Three review authors independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. For this update, we identified two new relevant randomised controlled trials. Main results We included six trials involving 1270 participants in the review: three trials involving 686 participants compared routine shunting with no shunting, one trial involving 200 participants compared routine shunting with selective shunting, one trial involving 253 participants compared selective shunting with and without near‐infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, and the other trial involving 131 participants compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. In general, reporting of methodology in the included studies was poor. For most studies, the blinding of outcome assessors and the report of prespecified outcomes were unclear. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative neurological deficit between selective shunting with and without near‐infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, However, this analysis was inadequately powered to reliably detect the effect. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in participants selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared with pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited. Authors' conclusions This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Large scale randomised trials of routine shunting versus selective shunting are required. No method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes." @default.
• W2279367042 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2279367042 creator A5059958418 @default.
• W2279367042 creator A5064212571 @default.
• W2279367042 creator A5080806382 @default.
• W2279367042 date "2014-06-23" @default.
• W2279367042 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2279367042 title "Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)" @default.
• W2279367042 cites W121592306 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1581443256 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1740376762 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1747195961 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1963485293 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1966136379 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1966755220 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1972690404 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1973395163 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1973573522 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1974634553 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1976122475 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1979352298 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1979550050 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1986987068 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W1991354505 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2007911452 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2011932878 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2013515274 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2030272872 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2035841789 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2036397809 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2037121579 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2041049279 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2044414659 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2052480082 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2057631921 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2058857279 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2058996472 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2112816676 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2126355194 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2126796783 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2128053082 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2130583197 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2134221438 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2147999569 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2156120098 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2160788168 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2162175037 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2166483910 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2279367042 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2416981234 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2462946007 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2767911074 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W2990290481 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W306286460 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4214559180 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4234726996 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4237839216 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4239471829 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4244117401 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4250366147 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4290747706 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4324264875 @default.
• W2279367042 cites W4376848366 @default.
• W2279367042 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000190.pub3" @default.
• W2279367042 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7032624" @default.
• W2279367042 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24956204" @default.
• W2279367042 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2279367042 type Work @default.
• W2279367042 sameAs 2279367042 @default.
• W2279367042 citedByCount "111" @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422012 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422013 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422014 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422015 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422016 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422017 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422018 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422019 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422020 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422021 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422022 @default.
• W2279367042 countsByYear W22793670422023 @default.
• W2279367042 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2279367042 hasAuthorship W2279367042A5059958418 @default.
• W2279367042 hasAuthorship W2279367042A5064212571 @default.
• W2279367042 hasAuthorship W2279367042A5080806382 @default.
• W2279367042 hasBestOaLocation W22793670422 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C197328160 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C2779745121 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConceptScore W2279367042C126322002 @default.
• W2279367042 hasConceptScore W2279367042C141071460 @default.

• next