FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2279652103> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2279652103 abstract "News on health-related issues is gaining importance in traditional news media (Dunwoody, 2008; Peters, 2008; Trench, 2008; Kaiser Family Foundation & Pew Research Center, 2009; Picard & Yeo, 2011; Secko, Amend & Friday, 2013). Health journalists browse through the large amount of incoming health news every day to act as gatekeepers (Levi, 2001). Previous research indicates that the selection and framing of health-related news is largely influenced by elitist sources, as for instance, by stakeholders from the pharmaceutical sector and researchers of academic and commercial research institutions (Caulfield, 2004; Abelson & Collins, 2009; Kruvand, 2009; Len-Rios, Hinnant, Sun, Cameron, Frisby & Young, 2009; Hinnant, Len-Rios & Oh, 2012). Sourcing practices are strongly connected to professional standards and routines, a combination of efficiency and power considerations (Reich, 2011). Since journalists have stressing deadlines, they prefer sources that do not need to pass the extensive process of reliability and believability checks (Gans, 1979; Herman & Chomsky, 2012). Digital media however have rocked sourcing practices and daily routines in newsrooms (Mitchelstein & Boczkowski, 2009). The world wide web has given access to a broader range of information as provided also by civil society actors and citizens (Hermida & Thurman, 2008).In this paper we confront the traditional elitist newsroom sourcing practices with a broad range of civil society actors, who act as bottom-up sources using social media to spread their messages. Our main goal therefore is to detect whether, in health journalism, sourcing practices can be linked with strategies of empowerment of non-institutional stakeholders. We use a quantitative content analysis to examine the content of health journalism in a broad range of news media, enriched with more in-depth analysis on framing. The analysis is not limited to content variables as such, but mainly highlights sourcing practices as visible in the media texts, and gives an overview as well of the different stakeholders represented in the content flow. Our content analysis includes 1014 features from 5 newspapers (Het Laatste Nieuws, Het Nieuwsblad, De Morgen, De Standaard and Metro), 2 television news programs (Het Nieuws and Het Journaal), 11 news-related programs on the commercial and public broadcasts, 6 weeklies (Libelle, Dag Allemaal, Flair, Humo, Knack and P Magazine), 5 monthlies (Bodytalk, Plus Magazine, Vitaya Magazine, Goed Gevoel and Eos), 2 radio broadcasts (Radio 1 and Q Music) and 2 health news websites (Gezondheid & Wetenschap and Gezondheid.be). We decided to monitor the total amount of health news that appeared in February 2015 to explore the broad field of health journalism. A coding guide and registration form were developed to ensure a high level of uniformity in the coding output. A critically composed sample of 10% of the articles was tested for inter-coder reliability with an outcome of Cohen’s Kappa values ranging from 0.68 up to 1.00. Analysis was carried out using PASW Statistics 22. In the news coverage on health, we often notice patients and their family in the news. On one hand, patients do make a valuable contribution to the health news coverage as actors being quoted. Personal testimonies and stories about patients that were able to overcome their disease after a severe treatment or patients that struggle with a similar disorder, give a personal touch to health by which the readers are more attracted to health issues. These findings confirm different international studies (Weigold, 2001; Bubela & Caulfield, 2004) that classify personalization and identification as news values. On the other hand, our results offer proof that patients and patient associations do not play an important role as source. In what Allan (2011) called the ‘hierarchy of credibility’, he states that the role of ordinary citizens in the hierarchy of sources is rather limited. Power and efficiency considerations lead to the traditional sourcing practices, thus still relying on long-established, professional sources (Gans, 1979). With regard to health news, we connect this to the importance of experts and academics. In our research, we also add the pharmaceutical industry to the list." @default.
• W2279652103 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2279652103 creator A5032553143 @default.
• W2279652103 creator A5048272525 @default.
• W2279652103 creator A5091651230 @default.
• W2279652103 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2279652103 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2279652103 title "Mobilizing the crowd or sticking to the elite? A quantitative media monitoring study on sourcing practices of Belgian health journalists" @default.
• W2279652103 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2279652103 type Work @default.
• W2279652103 sameAs 2279652103 @default.
• W2279652103 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2279652103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2279652103 hasAuthorship W2279652103A5032553143 @default.
• W2279652103 hasAuthorship W2279652103A5048272525 @default.
• W2279652103 hasAuthorship W2279652103A5091651230 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C119513131 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C169087156 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C20555606 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C2775987171 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C513891491 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C119513131 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C127413603 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C144024400 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C169087156 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C17744445 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C199539241 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C20555606 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C2775987171 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C29595303 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C39549134 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C513891491 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C518677369 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C66938386 @default.
• W2279652103 hasConceptScore W2279652103C94625758 @default.
• W2279652103 hasLocation W22796521031 @default.
• W2279652103 hasOpenAccess W2279652103 @default.
• W2279652103 hasPrimaryLocation W22796521031 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W1783718633 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W181170147 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W1931845617 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2183274832 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2222658955 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W225065950 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2258053300 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2286579033 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2297807725 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2399477420 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2492280734 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2527318063 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2553173658 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2593209405 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2913589187 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2916054264 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2919688499 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2949675430 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W2969604128 @default.
• W2279652103 hasRelatedWork W3038388007 @default.
• W2279652103 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2279652103 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2279652103 magId "2279652103" @default.
• W2279652103 workType "article" @default.