FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2280128724> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2280128724 endingPage "664" @default.
• W2280128724 startingPage "660" @default.
• W2280128724 abstract "The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left Yuval Levin New York: Basic Books, 2013, 296 pp. The French Revolution changed politics forever--in part, of course, because nearly everyone believes that it did and because we have generally acted accordingly. Since 1789, Western political views have been understood to fall into two broad camps: The left bases its claims on reason, a universal notion of human rights, and the pursuit of direct, immediate reform; the right privileges tradition, the continuity of the social order, and change only when absolutely necessary for that order's upkeep. Both profess to love liberty. Post-1789, one can hardly do otherwise. Yuval Levin's The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left is a product of, and a commentary on, this admittedly fertile terrain. The book traces, with copious reference to original source material, the sharply divergent worldviews of Thomas Paine and Edmund Burke, writers who have since become avatars of left and right. Anyone who wants a thoughtful, well-organized picture of these two remarkable public intellectuals should pick up Levin's book, which maps their disagreements in a set of clear, thematic chapters (Nature and History, Justice and Order, Choice and Obligation, and so on). Levin's lucid exposition shows even the casual reader why left and right have been such intellectual touchstones. Here you will find a powerful set of tools for analyzing both the French Revolution and the world of today. Libertarians, of course, dispute the left-right paradigm. Whatever its strengths, we find that, at best, it tells only part of the story; at worst, we find that it obscures the really fundamental questions. We worry that limiting our discourse to left and right leaves no general and principled rejection of state power in favor of voluntarism. On this view, we may like to think that Burke and Paine alike were foes of tyranny, which they surely were, and that, because they were friends of the American Revolution, both were not so far from us. So if libertarians have affinity for Burke and Paine, then where are we on the left-right continuum? The middle? That doesn't seem right. Thus, one libertarian critique of Levin's work nearly writes itself: What if, in politics, there are--or should be--more choices than two? Why this arbitrary classification? A more subtle libertarian critique might run as follows: What if the French Revolution didn't work as big a change as either side believed? What if not very much changed at all--apart, that is, from our vocabulary? Classical liberals commonly alleged as much. In particular, Alexis de Tocqueville famously recast the French Revolution as beginning with a state with concentrated power and ending with a state with even more concentrated power. What if he was right? Burke and Paine were fine thinkers, this critique runs, and both must be understood by anyone who wishes to comment on modern ideology. But the same can be said of Tocqueville, and his approach complicates things considerably. Much of the real action again lies well off the one-dimensional left-right continuum. Now, a book on Burke, Paine, and Tocqueville would be a very different one from the volume Levin wrote, and it's never a completely fair critique to fault an author for not having written the book one would wish to have read. I don't mean to do so here, so I shall have to look for other faults, few as they are. On the question of how the lessons of Burke and Paine should apply to today's politics, some reviewers have wished for more. Levin offers much about their own time, but quite little about anything thereafter, and almost all of it is confined to his conclusion. As for me, I suspect that a reasonably well-informed reader can fill in the blanks well enough. Perhaps also we are better off when left to do this work ourselves, considering that Yuval Levin's characterization of what it means to be a Burkean today will differ from, say, Andrew Sullivan's. …" @default.
• W2280128724 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2280128724 creator A5020633556 @default.
• W2280128724 date "2014-09-22" @default.
• W2280128724 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2280128724 title "The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left" @default.
• W2280128724 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2280128724 type Work @default.
• W2280128724 sameAs 2280128724 @default.
• W2280128724 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2280128724 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2280128724 hasAuthorship W2280128724A5020633556 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C10138342 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C138885662 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C139621336 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C144024400 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C162324750 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C17744445 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C182306322 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C199539241 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C94625758 @default.
• W2280128724 hasConceptScore W2280128724C95457728 @default.
• W2280128724 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2280128724 hasLocation W22801287241 @default.
• W2280128724 hasOpenAccess W2280128724 @default.
• W2280128724 hasPrimaryLocation W22801287241 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W106465131 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W1482294027 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W156376498 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W1569037737 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2000424256 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2030361559 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2069139151 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2091282074 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2156283497 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2165585924 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2168977467 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2215797712 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2312543069 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2316297842 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2321442000 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2330881495 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W394476230 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W218020612 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2214439082 @default.
• W2280128724 hasRelatedWork W2513966274 @default.
• W2280128724 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2280128724 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2280128724 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2280128724 magId "2280128724" @default.
• W2280128724 workType "article" @default.