Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W228419533> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 79 of
79
with 100 items per page.
- W228419533 startingPage "604" @default.
- W228419533 abstract "(ProQuest Information and Learning: ... denotes formulae omitted.) Dialogue and Drama: Elements of Greek Tragedy in the Fourth Gospel, by Jo-Ann Brant. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004. Pp. 320. $19.95 (paper). ISBN 1565639073. The purpose of this book is to explore the relationship of the Fourth Gospel (FG) to Greek tragedy (GT). It is not intertextual analysis that Brant undertakes, but rather the more generic study of the influences that the Greek tragedians may have exerted on the Gospel of John. Brant's overarching perspective is that in many ways the form of the FG is a performance text. Theatrical criticism, particularly of the structuralist variety, provides the perspective and tools with which the text is studied. Four chapters examine how Greek tragedy can enlighten the FG's dramatic structure (ch. 1), speeches (ch. 2), characterization (ch. 3), and distinctive portrayal of Jesus's death (ch. 4). As for how the FG could have knowledge of these tragedies when they appear to no longer have been performed publicly in the first century C.E., Brant notes that educational training in Greek was heavily influenced by past classics. Quintilian ranked the great tragedians with Homer as models to be studied, claims Brant. Quintilian appears to place, however, the comedie poets of Aristophanes, Eupolis, and Cratinus as second to Homer in Attic style (lnst. 10.1.65). But there is no need to cavil because Quintilian also holds up the three great tragedians as exemplars (10.1.67). Moreover, I note that another justification for this type of investigation comes from Dio Chrysostom, who placed the works of Euripides on par with those of Homer and Menander for the training of public speakers (Die. exercit. 6-8). Under the rubric of Dramatic Structure, Brant proposes nine areas of similarity between the FG and the GT. The first two of them concern prologues and epilogues. Although not formally similar, the prologues in each are distinct from the start of the narrative and provide perspective, not shared by the characters, that allows the audience to jump into the story in medias res. Brant also argues that both Euripides and the fourth evangelist (FE) have contrapuntal imagery in their prologues, which sets up the tension in the body of their works, and that the first person plural pronouns in John 1:14 draws the audience into the performance of the Gospel. She provides but two examples of comparable devices to pull spectators into the tragedies, and only one of them, from Euripides' Alcestis, appears to unambiguously do so. As for the epilogues, in both the GT and the FG they encourage the reader's affirmation of the events that have preceded them. The third through sixth areas of dramatic structure which Brant compares are the settings, the entrances and exits of characters, the transitions between episodes, and the unity of composition. Brant contends that the FE is more attentive to the spatiotemporal matrix of the episodes than are the Synoptics, and that this attention is comparable to the careful location of the episodes by the tragedians. The appearance of characters in the FG is also considered by Brant to be more purposeful than in the Synoptics and more in correspondence with the way characters appear in the tragedies. Scenes are often demarcated by the appearances of characters whose ingresses and egresses have dramatic significance. Some transitions in the FG are said to resemble the choral ode (...) in tragedies by apprising readers of the feelings and beliefs of characters. The concern for the unity of composition found in the tragedies is said to be marked in the FG by (1) creating suspense by frequent references to Jesus's death (which, I note, has an analogue in the references to Jerusalem in the Lukan travel section); (2) a plot line with climax and closure; and (3) a logical set of movements within the plot. Peripeteia, anagnorisis, and pathos constitute the final three foci of this chapter. …" @default.
- W228419533 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W228419533 creator A5037787242 @default.
- W228419533 date "2006-10-01" @default.
- W228419533 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W228419533 title "Dialogue and Drama: Elements of Greek Tragedy in the Fourth Gospel" @default.
- W228419533 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W228419533 type Work @default.
- W228419533 sameAs 228419533 @default.
- W228419533 citedByCount "13" @default.
- W228419533 countsByYear W2284195332013 @default.
- W228419533 countsByYear W2284195332017 @default.
- W228419533 countsByYear W2284195332019 @default.
- W228419533 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W228419533 hasAuthorship W228419533A5037787242 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C167651023 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C2776421488 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C2780027720 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C2780861071 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C2781384534 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C523419034 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
- W228419533 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C105795698 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C124952713 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C12713177 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C138885662 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C142362112 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C153349607 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C167651023 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C2524010 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C2776421488 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C2776445246 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C2780027720 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C2780861071 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C2781384534 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C33923547 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C523419034 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C74916050 @default.
- W228419533 hasConceptScore W228419533C95457728 @default.
- W228419533 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W228419533 hasLocation W2284195331 @default.
- W228419533 hasOpenAccess W228419533 @default.
- W228419533 hasPrimaryLocation W2284195331 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W1504153490 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W1566700682 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W1606462243 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2004553292 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2039299055 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2048080222 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2247835012 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2480932603 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2487346548 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2500162355 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2744457222 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W2972583723 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W589717429 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W594934181 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W640909935 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W78764752 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W807337997 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W832099628 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W851069349 @default.
- W228419533 hasRelatedWork W872563002 @default.
- W228419533 hasVolume "125" @default.
- W228419533 isParatext "false" @default.
- W228419533 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W228419533 magId "228419533" @default.
- W228419533 workType "article" @default.